MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
I did not use sarcasm.Sarcasm filter is clogged and needs cleaning.
I recommend drinking a quart of gasoline.
I did not use sarcasm.Sarcasm filter is clogged and needs cleaning.
I recommend drinking a quart of gasoline.
It's funny how libtards hate Jews so much, yet so many American Jew are libtards.
I did not use sarcasm.
So you are now claiming that Pink Floyd is not anti-Semitic, and you libtards are not therefore supportive of Pink Floyd?I know. The Liberals all did though you literal minded idiot.
So you are now claiming that Pink Floyd is not anti-Semitic, and you libtards are not therefore supportive of Pink Floyd?
We are on the same page my friend.Actually, they're claiming to be supportive of Pink Floyd not in spite of the anti-semitism, but *BECAUSE* of it.
They're Nazis.
Seriously. Why don't these leftist assholes spend a year or so in a Muslim country? I guarantee they'll be singing a different tune about the Jews.
It's no real surprise, is it?
The Democrats still have the Klan playbook in their file cabinets and are willing to pull it out anytime it is needed. Look at how they react to African Americans who dare to wander off of the Democrat plantation. Why should Jews be any different?
It's all about votes and government power. If enough Jews cross over the Democrats will become the party of Holocaust deniers.
Who's paying for this work?Using 50 words or less, please instruct us on how Roger Waters' diatribe translates to all liberals and the "Darlaks" in particular hating Jewry.
Refer to the rules of logic in your answer.
So you are now claiming that Pink Floyd is not anti-Semitic, and you libtards are not therefore supportive of Pink Floyd?
What's surprising is that once one gets beyond your name calling it becomes apparent that in all your posts so far you have not refuted even one thing that Waters said about the actual conditions in Israel or the occupied territories. It seems to me if you were interested in fighting all this "anti-semitism" that you are so quick to identify, your cause and case would be better served by refuting Waters' claims than by throwing a tantrum and resorting to name calling for anyone who agrees with Waters or who says anything against your posts. But perhaps name calling and tantrums are all you have; they are certainly all you have decided to use so far. I'll check back later after you get done calling me an "anti-semite" and "Nazi" and "Hitler" and so on, and see how you are doing. But to gain a semblance of respect you might actually argue the points if you have any evidence to support your own position here, unless of course you position is simply that anyone who criticizes Israeli policy is an "anti-semite" and "Nazi" and if that is your position then I would say your argument is irrational and weak.
So you are now claiming that Pink Floyd is not anti-Semitic, and you libtards are not therefore supportive of Pink Floyd?
Pot. Kettle. Black.
After the initial post you had ample opportunities to voice a contrary position, but instead opted to research the rabbi, and then ridicule him and I in an unrelated manner.
I've already taken a position in favor of the rabbi's. You, on the other hand, have offered nothing but the very type of insults you decry.
Consider yourself PWNED.
Seriously. Why don't these leftist assholes spend a year or so in a Muslim country? I guarantee they'll be singing a different tune about the Jews.
I did nothing
Actually, they're claiming to be supportive of Pink Floyd not in spite of the anti-semitism, but *BECAUSE* of it.
They're Nazis.
What is the title of this thread?Hey dumb ass Pink Floyd is a band, Roger Waters is a person. The quotes in the news story belonged to Roger Waters, not to the band Pink Floyd! Maybe that's too hard for you to follow, being an educated scientist and all!
It is sad that you miss the point. It isn't the Jews, it is the government of Israel and their policies towards some of the people who live in the area.