The battle over Obamacare is finally won.

are you suggesting that all members of congress don't share a duty to their constituents to attempt to make laws better?
 
as if that were a surprise to you? National health care and gay marriage are definitely long held views of the Democrats. I share those.
 
maineman said:
are you suggesting that all members of congress don't share a duty to their constituents to attempt to make laws better?
Click to expand...

Do you always answer a question with a question dishonest dunce? When you answer my questions with a modicum of honesty,then I will gladly answer your questions. Mkay?
 
my question was totally honest. I believe that all members of congress have a primary duty to their constituents that supersedes their duty to their party... and their duty to their constituents requires that the always keep working to improve the laws that come forth from congress.... do you, or do you NOT agree with that position?
 
because, you see... this post seems to make it seem like you think that party affiliation overrules any obligation to constituents.

Truth Detector said:
Please explain why a political party that was shut out of the legislative decisions of a really bad and poorly thought out law have any obligation to their constituents to try and fix it?
Click to expand...
 
maineman said:
as if that were a surprise to you? National health care and gay marriage are definitely long held views of the Democrats. I share those.
Click to expand...

Low information dunces like you are not the issue; it is the dishonest way Democrats like Obama present their agenda.

How much of a chance would the AHCA have had if Democrats had said that their goal is nationalized healthcare? Let me help you because you're a dishonest dunce; ZERO.

When candidate Obama uttered that he believed that marriage should be between a man and a woman; was he lying? Based on his desperate re-election apparently he was.
 
maineman said:
my question was totally honest. I believe that all members of congress have a primary duty to their constituents that supersedes their duty to their party... and their duty to their constituents requires that the always keep working to improve the laws that come forth from congress.... do you, or do you NOT agree with that position?
Click to expand...

No it was not; it was a dishonest attempt to deflect.

As to your answer, that is a lie. If Republicans had overwhelming majorities in the Congress and Presidency, and turned SS into a private investment account along party lines, would Democrats be obligated to make it work? If Republicans in the majority passed a law that made marraige between same sex couples illegal along straight party lines, would Democrats be obligated to make it work?

The FIX that Republicans correctly perceive for the AHCA is a total repeal. This is what the majority of their constituents believe to be right.
 
maineman said:
my question was totally honest. I believe that all members of congress have a primary duty to their constituents that supersedes their duty to their party... and their duty to their constituents requires that the always keep working to improve the laws that come forth from congress.... do you, or do you NOT agree with that position?
Click to expand...

Can you cite a source (other than your personal beliefs) for that "duty". Commander?
 
and what are the chances of achieving total repeal? interesting to note that none of the GOP respondents to the SOTU address mentioned repeal of Obamacare. Don't you think the time has come to quit grandstanding about that issue and work to make the system better?
 
maineman said:
because, you see... this post seems to make it seem like you think that party affiliation overrules any obligation to constituents.
Click to expand...

Based on this statement, it is obvious that you don't think. I am amused that you "think" Republicans are not abiding by their obligation to their constituents by trying to repeal this act. Most got elected and re-elected on a promise to repeal the act.

But it is equally amusing and farcical that you believe that repealing this abomination is not a way to fix it; many corrctly believe that it is the ONLY way to "fix" it.
 
Truth Detector said:
Based on this statement, it is obvious that you don't think. I am amused that you "think" Republicans are not abiding by their obligation to their constituents by trying to repeal this act. Most got elected and re-elected on a promise to repeal the act.

But it is equally amusing and farcical that you believe that repealing this abomination is not a way to fix it; many corrctly believe that it is the ONLY way to "fix" it.
Click to expand...

"correctly believe". interesting turn of a phrase. It would seem that you think that only your beliefs are "correct". lol
 
Big Money said:
What were the chances of eliminating slavery, segregation, or the disenfranchisement of women and Blacks, Commander?
Click to expand...

the long march of progressive liberalism has indeed been very successful. Which is why I think that reversing that momentum is like trying to stem the tide.
 
maineman said:
inch by inch... the longest journey starts with but a single step.
Click to expand...

Wrong again Commander Dimwit; it did not start with a step, but rather lies. And when legislators create laws built upon lies, they should correctly be marginalized from political power by the voters. And those laws that have been built upon lies and falsehoods be repealed.

Let's hope the American sheeple wake up before they mistaken.y become wards of the State.

The leftist agenda can only be sustained through lies and dishonesty.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top