The best arguments atheists and religionists have been able to muster

Cypress said:
So you are so deeply impressed with my writing and syntax
Click to expand...
I wouldn't go that far.

Cypress said:
you imagine it can only conceivably come from Encyclopedia Britannica and ChatGPT.
Click to expand...
Nope. I acknowledge that you occasionally paraphrase, and that you compete in how you present the same information.

Cypress said:
I'm flattered.
Click to expand...
If all you're really looking for is attention, I'm happy to help.
 
IBDaMann said:
I wouldn't go that far.


Nope. I acknowledge that you occasionally paraphrase, and that you compete in how you present the same information.


If all you're really looking for is attention, I'm happy to help.
Click to expand...
You are constantly seething in resentment and openly complaining that I am
supposedly cutting and pasting from internet encyclopedia sources and using AI programs to format and style my writing and syntax.

Obviously you lurk my posts and are deeply impressed with my writing and presentation, and assume it can only conceivably be the product of AI and encyclopedia editors.

I'm flattered but at the same time creeped out that some dude is lurking me and seething in grudging admiration.
 
Cypress said:
You are constantly seething in resentment and openly complaining that I am
supposedly cutting and pasting from internet encyclopedia sources and using AI programs to format and style my writing and syntax.
Click to expand...
Why do you believe that I bear any resentment? I commend you on your ability to emulate AWS DataSync.

Cypress said:
Obviously you lurk my posts
Click to expand...
Lurk? You obviously don't understand the word. Do I not openly respond to your posts? How can I be "lurking"?

Cypress said:
I'm flattered
Click to expand...
You're welcome.

Cypress said:
but at the same time creeped out that some dude is lurking me and seething in grudging admiration.
Click to expand...
You sound like Kamala.
 
IBDaMann said:
Too funny! I said that you emulate it.
Click to expand...
So you admit you are so deeply impressed with my writing, knowledge, and syntax, you assume it can only conceivably be a result of Artificial Intelligence, Encyclopedia Britannica editors, and sophisticated computer software :laugh:

:magagrin:
 
Cypress said:
So you admit you are so deeply impressed with my writing, knowledge, and syntax,
Click to expand...
So you admit that you cannot read for comprehension and that you can only copy-paste.

Cypress said:
you assume it can only conceivably be a result of Artificial Intelligence, Encyclopedia Britannica editors, and sophisticated computer software
Click to expand...
... or someone emulating poor versions thereof.
 
IBDaMann said:
So you admit that you cannot read for comprehension and that you can only copy-paste.


... or someone emulating poor versions thereof.
Click to expand...
The fact that you read most of my threads and posts, while I almost never read yours, except when you jump up and down :yay: for my attention, is more indication of your obvious inferiority complex regarding the content of my posts.

You threads and posts are just way too boring to invest time in.
 
Cypress said:
The fact that you read most of my threads and posts, ...
Click to expand...
I believe I read all of them. You make many errors and I don't mind pointing out mistakes, providing correct answers and offering a few pro tips.

Cypress said:
... while I almost never read yours,
Click to expand...
You have made it clear that you don't have it in you to really learn anything, which is why your posts are never correct. My posts are for others who would actually like to learn from your mistakes.

Cypress said:
You threads and posts are just way too boring to invest time in.
Click to expand...
Naturally, you will find all of my posts boring considering that you aren't capable of learning.
 
IBDaMann said:
I believe I read all of them. You make many errors and I don't mind pointing out mistakes, providing correct answers and offering a few pro tips.


You have made it clear that you don't have it in you to really learn anything, which is why your posts are never correct. My posts are for others who would actually like to learn from your mistakes.


Naturally, you will find all of my posts boring considering that you aren't capable of learning.
Click to expand...
So I am the gold standard you seek to compare yourself to. :laugh:

On this thread you have demonstrated a lot of detailed knowledge about what it takes to use Artificial Intelligence and sophisticated software to help one compose posts.

Maybe that's why your posts never sound sincere or genuinely insightful, and are just too boring to read.
 
IBDaMann said:
My posts are for others who would actually like to learn from your mistakes.
Click to expand...
:lolup: Anyone who "learns" from you is only learning how to be a scientific illiterate.
Your scientific stupidity isn't even worth reading and responding to anymore! :laugh:


IBDumbass Scientific Illiteracy Hall of Fame:

IBDumbass said: Nope. Photons don't "mediate" anything!
:lolup: :lolup: :lolup:
Cypress said: "Electromagnetism in general is mediated by photons. This is a quantum phenomenon" (source: University of Illinois Physics Department)


IBDumbass said: Nope. Higgs boson does NOT account for mass!
:lolup: :lolup: :lolup:
Cypress said: Higgs boson: "The existence of this mass-giving field was confirmed in 2012, when the Higgs boson particle was discovered at CERN." (source: European Center for Nuclear Research - CERN)


IBDaMann said: What do you mean by "the standard model"?
:lolup: :lolup: :lolup:
Cypress said: Never heard of if? LOL...."The Standard Model of Particle Physics is scientists' current best theory to describe the most basic building blocks of the universe." (Source, U S. Department of Energy, Office of Science)


More IBDumbass scientific illiteracy -->

IBDumbass said: Darwin's theory of evolution is not science
:lolup: :lolup: :lolup:
IBDumbass said: hint: energy and matter are not interchangeable
:lolup: :lolup: :lolup:
IBDaMann said: Wave-Particle duality is classical physics.
:lolup: :lolup: :lolup:
IBDaMann said: There is no such thing as an accelerating reference frame!!
:lolup: :lolup: :lolup:
IBDaMann said: What do you mean by "the standard model"?
:lolup: :lolup: :lolup:
IBDaMann said: science doesn't explain anything about nature!
:lolup: :lolup: :lolup:


Sources:
The greatest success story in physics | Page 13 | Just Plain Politics Forums
The greatest success story in physics | Page 12 | Just Plain Politics Forums
 
Mason 22 said:
But he spends the time to research ,which is more than I would do!
Yes he avoids personal opinion ,but he does try to have what he preceives as good source material.
Click to expand...
he's a masonic piece of shit who is dead set on obscuring not only the message of chrisianity, but the value of all religion, and the value of morality itself.

he pushes scientism above all else.

scientism is actually an abandonment of logic and an appeal to authority, the most used logical fallacy of all.
 
Lao Tse said:
he's a masonic piece of shit who is dead set on obscuring not only the message of chrisianity, but the value of all religion, and the value of morality itself.

he pushes scientism above all else.

scientism is actually an abandonment of logic and an appeal to authority, the most used logical fallacy of all.
Click to expand...
He says he isn't a Christian, so why would he believe in the divinity of Jesus Christ?
 
Mason 22 said:
He says he isn't a Christian, so why would he believe in the divinity of Jesus Christ?
Click to expand...
of course he's not a christian.


he worship Lucifer.

but her pretends to be a Christian authority.

this is the legacy of a once great freemasonry.

"is there any help for the widow's son?"
 
Lao Tse said:
he's a masonic piece of shit who is dead set on obscuring the value of morality itself.

he pushes scientism above all else.
Click to expand...

I have probably posted more threads on values and ethics than anyone on jpp.

Just because MAGA morons only have the ability, interest, and education to cogently discuss one or two topics, doesn't mean that limitation applies to everyone else.

C

Thread 'Are values purely subjective?'

G.E. Moore's Principia Ethica gives three thought experiments that suggest there is an objective side to value beyond the purely subjective.

A first argument is that beauty can have an intrinsic value, even if no one is around to see it. A universe that lacks any conciousness, but has the grand canyon, sunsets, waterfalls is still better than an opaque and colorless universe. Moore claims this shows beauty has an intrinsic objective value, even if no one is around to see it. .

The second argument is the magic button thought experiment. You have a choice to push a button which...
C

Thread 'Christian ethics vs. Roman values'

Jack said:
I believe Owl (like Cypress) was brainwashed as a child into believing religion is synonymous with 'Compassion' and 'Mercy'.
According to Cypress, Compassion and Mercy were invented 2,000 years ago. Before then, no one knew what it was.
Click to expand...
Post my exact words with the link, rather than mischaracterize what I said

Now, the mainstream, midde-of-the-road, milquetoast, highly reputable Encyclopedia Britannica reports almost exactly everything I ever told you about this topic:

-Judeo-Christian ethics were something new and influential in western history.

-For...
C

Thread 'Six reasons to study comparative world religions'

Ethical and moral codes of conduct and legal standards in most societies are rooted in religious traditions.

To overcome our misconceptions and ignorance about the beliefs of others.

To better comprehend the human potential for self-transcendence.

To better understand our culture, which in the western case is rooted in the Abrahamic traditions.

To achieve a better global perspective of humanity.

To help cultivate and frame our own beliefs and philosophy of life.
  • Like
 
Cypress said:
I have probably posted more threads on values and ethics than anyone on jpp.

Just because MAGA morons only have the ability, interest, and education to cogently discuss one or two topics, doesn't mean that limitation applies to everyone else.

C

Thread 'Are values purely subjective?'

G.E. Moore's Principia Ethica gives three thought experiments that suggest there is an objective side to value beyond the purely subjective.

A first argument is that beauty can have an intrinsic value, even if no one is around to see it. A universe that lacks any conciousness, but has the grand canyon, sunsets, waterfalls is still better than an opaque and colorless universe. Moore claims this shows beauty has an intrinsic objective value, even if no one is around to see it. .

The second argument is the magic button thought experiment. You have a choice to push a button which...
C

Thread 'Christian ethics vs. Roman values'

Jack said:
I believe Owl (like Cypress) was brainwashed as a child into believing religion is synonymous with 'Compassion' and 'Mercy'.
According to Cypress, Compassion and Mercy were invented 2,000 years ago. Before then, no one knew what it was.
Click to expand...
Post my exact words with the link, rather than mischaracterize what I said

Now, the mainstream, midde-of-the-road, milquetoast, highly reputable Encyclopedia Britannica reports almost exactly everything I ever told you about this topic:

-Judeo-Christian ethics were something new and influential in western history.

-For...
C

Thread 'Six reasons to study comparative world religions'

Ethical and moral codes of conduct and legal standards in most societies are rooted in religious traditions.

To overcome our misconceptions and ignorance about the beliefs of others.

To better comprehend the human potential for self-transcendence.

To better understand our culture, which in the western case is rooted in the Abrahamic traditions.

To achieve a better global perspective of humanity.

To help cultivate and frame our own beliefs and philosophy of life.
  • Like
Click to expand...
you won't even say the word 'morality', why is that?

and most of your shit is glittering generalities and word games.

:truestory:
 
Last edited:
Cypress said:
So I am the gold standard you seek to compare yourself to.
Click to expand...
I have already addressed your inability to read for comprehension.

Cypress said:
On this thread you have demonstrated a lot of detailed knowledge about what it takes to use Artificial Intelligence
Click to expand...
I have? I don't think so. There's nothing to say. Using AI requires no skill. That's the nature of AI.

Cypress said:
Maybe that's why your posts never sound sincere or genuinely insightful,
Click to expand...
Nope. You don't ever perceive my posts as insightful because you don't understand them. Remember, my posts go right over your head and you thus find them very boring. You mention this often.

Cypress said:
and are just too boring to read.
Click to expand...
... and this brings the count to, what, 184?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top