I understand your point, but the government can and does take these rights sometimes. It’s simply a matter of where the line is drawn... not absolute.
The Bill of Rights is NOT negotiable.
- Thread starter Rune
- Start date
I understand your point, but the government can and does take these rights sometimes. It’s simply a matter of where the line is drawn... not absolute.
Not voluntary, sorry stupid claim. Ask most of them.
Mr.Badguy
Super lefty
Exactly, gun owners of this thread, at what point would you break the law to own a gun, what kind of legislation would seem unfair enough to you to break it or even start fighting back?
Are you on drugs?
I take a statin.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
you know the 5th Amendment, right????
SmarterthanYou
rebel
the government was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself. - thomas jefferson.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
wrong. they can be taken away because WE THE PEOPLE said they could, AFTER due process.......NOT THE GOVERNMENT
SmarterthanYou
rebel
i'm already breaking the law.......an unconstitutional law. pretty soon, if the communist democrats have their way, it will be time to fight back
Who exactly do you think provides “Due Process”?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
a jury of our peers.....................we the people.
Do you always whine and cry like a little baby when you lose a debate? I'd imagine the answer is yes.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
do you consider it karma for your dead friend that you wished covid deaths upon all the trumpers?????? you should consider that answer as yes
Airstrip One
Completely Effed
It's called being a Dem.
So to you “due process” consists of a jury trial? That the only thing that constitutes due process?
I haven't come close to losing, Liar
The Constitution is an evolving document. So applying originalist, 18th-century thinking to certain parts of it, but not to other parts of it, leads to inconsistency and incoherence.
Basically, you can't say that a certain part of the Constitution should be interpreted as it was in the 18th century, but a different part should be interpreted by today's standards.
Same thing with the Bible; Conservatives abuse the notions there too.
The Bible and the Constitution are the two documents Conservatives cite the most, but have never really fully read either.
Yes you have. You asserted that the Bill of Rights was 'not negotiable'. We showed you numerous examples of the Bill of Rights being subject to judicial review, and your response was simply to engage in ad hom attacks. Your premise was obliterated. You are just too dishonest to admit it. That's your problem. Why did you start the thread? I'd imagine so you could troll those who challenged you. Trolling seems to be your main purpose here.
So he was wrong who cares!
answer the question about my 9mm should I have to use a single shot musket pistol?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
STOP, right there. you're dead wrong. It is NOT an evolving document. the ONLY changes come from we the people