The Charlie Kirk killing is back firing badly. People everywhere have had enuff.

I find the rush to judgment completely repugnant.

We have no idea what this shooter's motives were at this point. People point to the casings they found - but that could easily be a false flag.

Why can't we let the investigation play out? I'd agree that on the surface, it looks political. But if it's not what people think, it will be insanely embarrassing for many on the right who have already rushed to judgment.
Blow it out yor cheez hole.
 
What kind of white enclave do you live in? In Dearborn/Detroit, we have Pole Town. We have a Mexican town. We have a German town. We have blacks. We have Muslim neighborhoods. In fact, Muslim neighborhoods are sub divided by differing regions and ideas. You have a choice for foods and cultures. I think we are better for that.

Wow, you can order diarrhea slop from all over the world!!! Enjoy your dog and cat kabobs and sandwiches, lol.
 
Show me someone on the right calling for Civil-War?!

I think of myself as a centrist, but the Radical Lefties always claim I am right wing.

I don't want civil-war. I am doing everything I can to keep it from coming to that. Because I've been in foreign countries in the middle of a civil-war, so I know what it really means!

The Only Americans I see egging on a civil-war all all Radical-Lefties.

-
I posted the link on here already go back and read it.
 
They have found 3 cartridges with trans related bullshit written on them.


And it is highly unlikely that any such cartridge was used in the actual killing. For starters, engraving on a cartridge greatly lowers its reliability. It can cause miss-fires, explosions, jams, and low accuracy.

The weapon found in the woods was likely just a decoy. It lays a false path for investigators to allow the assassin more room and time to escape.

Chances are high that the shooter has already left the U.S.

-
 
Allot of the American political division is and has been created by agents of hostile foreign nations who benefit from America being in Chaos.

Many of the reactions by mostly the Lefties, and a few Right-Wing, has amplified the actions of the foreign agents and made creating the chaos easy for them. But without the spurs from outsiders, we would not being in the mess we are currently seeing.

I suspect that this assassination was more of the same.

-
 
This attack could have been:

The Chinese

The Iranians

The Yemen War Lords

The Somalis War Lords

The WEF

The Russians

The International Antifa ( Unlikely to be the Local, Amateur Hour Antifa, the Antifa in Russia and the Slavic Nations are Brutal )

The KM ( Those behind the Ukrainian War )




America has a long list of hostile foreign organizations/nations who benefit from our division.


-
 
Apparently they have now, but the messages written on the weapon and ammunition may have clued them in to motive.

If I were a Chinese assassin, or an Iranian assassin, I'd leave just such "Evidence", to further the divide and political chaos, both to increase the effects of the attack, but also cover escaping from America.

This "Find", was too easy, and too blatant and obvious.

It is likely just misdirection.

-
 
If this attack were done by American Antifa, or the militant LGBTQ crowd, after the first shot at Kirk, two dozen more rounds would have spayed the Audience in an Emotion Driven Attack.

This attack was precise and controlled.

This attack was not rage, it was an action for payment. Those who financed the hit may have been filled with rage, but the shooter was not.

-
 
Apparently they have now, but the messages written on the weapon and ammunition may have clued them in to motive.
It COULD BE, but then again IF he is a MAGA or right winger out to cause trouble?
Some not many MAGAS are smart enough to be able to engrave things , as I said not many but some.
 
If I were a Chinese assassin, or an Iranian assassin, I'd leave just such "Evidence", to further the divide and political chaos, both to increase the effects of the attack, but also cover escaping from America.

This "Find", was too easy, and too blatant and obvious.

It is likely just misdirection.

-
If you were that, and were trying to "get away with" the assassination rather than send a message about your political agenda you may do that, but I doubt it. If you were a uber religious terrorist you would make sure it was your message that was given. The goal was to send a message, not to just kill Charlie. This was an act of terrorism, unlawful violence to attempt to generate fear in the populace to change the government.
 
Sadly, neither side is interested in being a voice of calm or reason right now.

The internet has kind of ruined us. We really forgot how to talk to each other, and it is way too easy for demagogues to demonize large groups of people.
Well, the latest, and possibly most egregious slander / insult in this has come from W. Virginia where a Democrat (and because the Left loves to categorize people--Black woman) state representative Anitra Hamilton, made comparisons between Charlie Kirk and the Charlotte train murderer.

“You can murder ONE woman on a train by stabbing her in the neck and be condemned by the masses or you can travel the nation spewing hatred and racism, harming thousands and be loved by the masses…… and both have the same outcome.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opin...TS&cvid=68c44835675642149fc248ce01a7eab9&ei=8

You can disagree with everything Kirk ever said but that doesn't mean he harmed anyone. Here you have a state level politician making that comparison, saying that Kirk's worlds physically, or I suppose mentally, harmed "thousands." I'd say she's a complete lunatic, unhinged, and the one "spewing hated" and possibly some racism thrown in too.

The people that liked Kirk, and agreed with him, saw in his ideas something they liked and wanted to accept. Kirk wanted open debate. That was what he was doing when he was assassinated. It's what many Rightwing pundits and activists do, like Crowder, Shapiro, and the like. You don't see that on the Left. They want the opposite and if that means having to assassinate someone to shut them up, then they appear to be all for it.
 
Well, the latest, and possibly most egregious slander / insult in this has come from W. Virginia where a Democrat (and because the Left loves to categorize people--Black woman) state representative Anitra Hamilton, made comparisons between Charlie Kirk and the Charlotte train murderer.

“You can murder ONE woman on a train by stabbing her in the neck and be condemned by the masses or you can travel the nation spewing hatred and racism, harming thousands and be loved by the masses…… and both have the same outcome.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opin...TS&cvid=68c44835675642149fc248ce01a7eab9&ei=8

You can disagree with everything Kirk ever said but that doesn't mean he harmed anyone. Here you have a state level politician making that comparison, saying that Kirk's worlds physically, or I suppose mentally, harmed "thousands." I'd say she's a complete lunatic, unhinged, and the one "spewing hated" and possibly some racism thrown in too.

The people that liked Kirk, and agreed with him, saw in his ideas something they liked and wanted to accept. Kirk wanted open debate. That was what he was doing when he was assassinated. It's what many Rightwing pundits and activists do, like Crowder, Shapiro, and the like. You don't see that on the Left. They want the opposite and if that means having to assassinate someone to shut them up, then they appear to be all for it.

Pretty hypocritical post here. You just made a few voices that you're heard a "they" that comprises millions of people.

This kind of generalizing rhetoric is a part of the problem, and will play no part in the solution.
 
Back
Top