Social democrats believed that capitalism could be reformed and made to work for the benefit of all members of society and that such improvements could be achieved through democratic elections and reform.
Many prominent leaders of the early social democracy movement in Germany were members of the Catholic Church’s Social Union movement, which emphasized the dignity of workers and their families. It supported the interests of workers being collectively represented by organized trade unions. The German social Catholics would also support a social welfare state that included government-funded health care for all families as well as support for labor unions that included all workers.
In the same way, progressive members of the Anglican Church in Great Britain were among the early reformers of industrial capitalism, and they shared many aims with the German social democrats.
The ethical or moral basis for the rise of social democracy comes from Judeo-Christian theology concerning charity and the welfare of fellow humans. In this view, the suffering of humans, whatever its cause, requires us to try to alleviate that suffering. To some religious thinkers, permitting the continuation of suffering among one’s fellow human souls could be considered immoral and sinful.
Source credit: Edward Stuart, PhD, Professor of Economics, Northeastern Illinois University
The scriptures tell us that you can't legislate any law that will eliminate poverty....why? Poverty comes from many different sources due to a variety of reasons. There are circumstances, free will choices that cause individuals to be poor....some refuse to work, some cannot work because of illness or accident.....some are poor because of natural disasters and have lost everything. You can't MAKE someone work.......you can't MAKE someone redistribute his/her EARNED INCOME because someone refuses to attempt pull themselves out of poverty...that's not liberty, that totalitarianism leading to fascism as certain parts of society are demonized because they are more successful or less successful than others. In a free society can't someone choose to be poor and a beggar? If not why not? But..is it the duty of others to feed, house and take care of these individuals that simply refuse to work?
Yeah......that must be why the Christ stated, "You will ALWAYS have the poor among." -- John 12:8
Creating a welfare state must be why the Christ chastised those who followed him after the miracle of the fishes.....telling them He was not here as God incarnate to feed, house or care for everyone that was impoverished ...He was here to feed the spirit of man....the soul of man, each man was to work out his/her own physical needs. Jesus turned away over 5000 hungry individuals because they sought only to have a full belly. -- John 6:26-27
The Christ was no radical.......not liberal in the least. From the time of His birth he lived the life of a very ORTHODOX HEBREW...never once sinning under the old law of Moses. (Gal. 4:4) He had to walk as a man and without sin to fulfill the requirements established under the old law in order usher in the new law at His death......He had to be the perfect sacrificial lamb without blemish.
So the argument that Jesus was some kind of radical liberal promoting socialism is not established in scripture.....its man made dogma based upon traditions established by men.
When a Christian gives........he/she is supposed to give from the heart, not from a mandate of threat such as fine and or imprisonment that's not charity.......that is nothing but organized theft where you take from one man to give to another.....its based upon income redistribution and is at the heart of all communist movements.
What do the scripture say about working? "For even when we (the apostles) were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat." -- 2 Thess. 3:10
More clearly? "But if any not provide for his own, and especially for those of his own house, he has denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel (non-believer). -- 1 Tim. 5:8