The "Climate Gate" conspiracy theory: Game Over

gfm7175 said:
Wood and peat are not fossils, dumbass.
Click to expand...

I said both were not fossil fuels. They are "carbon based" fuels, but not fossil fuels. Wood is not dug up. Peat is dug up, but not from another geological era. Uranium is not a "carbon based" fuel, and is dug up. It was not formed on earth, but rather in a star that no longer exists, so is not from another geological era.

GFM just seems stupid when he confuses fossil fuels with stone fossils.
 
Walt said:
I said both were not fossil fuels. They are "carbon based" fuels, but not fossil fuels. Wood is not dug up. Peat is dug up, but not from another geological era. Uranium is not a "carbon based" fuel, and is dug up. It was not formed on earth, but rather in a star that no longer exists, so is not from another geological era.

GFM just seems stupid when he confuses fossil fuels with stone fossils.
Click to expand...
Walt just seems stupid when he continues to claim that people burn fossils for fuel.

You have yet to clarify what you mean by the word "fossil fuels"...
 
gfm7175 said:
Walt just seems stupid when he continues to claim that people burn fossils for fuel.

You have yet to clarify what you mean by the word "fossil fuels"...
Click to expand...

I have given you a full definition of fossil fuel, several times. It is not claiming they burn fossils... But actually, in a hyper technical sense they do. You do not seem to know what a fossil is.
 
gfm7175 said:
** affecting, not effecting.

Humans do not burn fossils for fuel. Do you mean carbon-based fuels?

Define "the climate". There is no "the climate" with regard to Earth. Climate, like weather, is a very localized term. Did you know that Wisconsin has a desert climate within it? I've been there before. It has sand, snakes, lizards, cacti, and other desert climate related critters and fauna. Most of Wisconsin is not a desert climate though.


Don't like people who don't share your Church of Global Warming beliefs, eh?
Click to expand...

I don't make the rules, I just follow them.

fossil fuel is a widely used term in industry, government, and news media referring to ancient plant and animal matter which has been thermally altered by geologic processes into hydrocarbons like petroleum, methane, coal.
 
Walt said:
I have given you a full definition of fossil fuel, several times. It is not claiming they burn fossils... But actually, in a hyper technical sense they do. You do not seem to know what a fossil is.
Click to expand...
Fossils are not being burned, moron... You have not defined what you mean by 'fossil fuel'.
 
gfm7175 said:
Fossils are not being burned, moron... You have not defined what you mean by 'fossil fuel'.
Click to expand...

Always a give away when the “pidgin” has to turn the exchange into one over semantics, “but you said ……..,” next we’ll get the Google glossary of fallacies
 
archives said:
Always a give away when the “pidgin” has to turn the exchange into one over semantics, “but you said ……..,” next we’ll get the Google glossary of fallacies
Click to expand...
So you have nothing intelligent to add to the discussion??

Thought so.
 
gfm7175 said:
So you have nothing intelligent to add to the discussion??

Thought so.
Click to expand...

Why would I, anyone for that matter, you eagerly swallowed the false paradigm propagandized by the energy companies and now are echoing the same, seen it all, been there before, like playing a game of tic tac toe, pointless
 
archives said:
Why would I, anyone for that matter, you eagerly swallowed the false paradigm propagandized by the energy companies and now are echoing the same, seen it all, been there before, like playing a game of tic tac toe, pointless
Click to expand...
What are you even talking about?
 
gfm7175 said:
What are you even talking about?
Click to expand...

Here we go with the semantics again, predictable, rather not play that game, again, here, I’ll just leave you with those who put a on the moon, a controllable rover and robot on Mars, think of the reality of man made climate change:

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
https://climate.nasa.gov/causes/
https://climate.nasa.gov/effects/
https://climate.nasa.gov/global-warming-vs-climate-change/
 
archives said:
Here we go with the semantics again, predictable, rather not play that game, again, here, I’ll just leave you with those who put a on the moon, a controllable rover and robot on Mars, think of the reality of man made climate change:

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
https://climate.nasa.gov/causes/
https://climate.nasa.gov/effects/
https://climate.nasa.gov/global-warming-vs-climate-change/
Click to expand...
NASA is not science. Learn how to answer a simple fucking question for a change.

What is this "false paradigm propagandized by the energy companies" that I have supposedly swallowed? I have no idea what you are talking about. You should be able to substantiate your claim, if it holds any meaning at all... It is quite obvious why you can't substantiate it...
 
Cypress said:
There is a contingent of MAGA who finally and belatedly admitted that burning fossil fuels contributes to global warming, but they claim it won't really cause any serious problems.
Click to expand...

Probably why the source of the River Thames has dried up....& not a serious problem.
 
Cypress said:
There is a contingent of MAGA who finally and belatedly admitted that burning fossil fuels contributes to global warming, but they claim it won't really cause any serious problems.
Click to expand...

Sounds like a reincarnation of WW II Nuremberg Trials defendants while burning Europe & England with a blitzkreig as all of those Nazington Islamidiotocracy Christiananality pedophilia thieving US Constitution Bill of Rights - old glory presented by Eisenhower - old testament arsonists of Rehnquist Fourth Reich July Christian Nation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top