BartenderElite
Verified User
I didn't have an article.
The clown car just keeps chugging along
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
I didn't have an article.
So says “Vance’s spokesman,” did you expect a “Vance spokesman” to admit it was a waste of taxpayer’s money that JD requested
The Secret Service confirms it...read your own fucking article.
Keep working for that 19% approval ; you're showing us all how to do it.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
where did hillarys budget come from to do this? taxpayers, moron. stop being an idiot.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
you morons should stop arguing against one side doing the same fucking thing that the other side does..............that's your problem
First off, you were wrong from the jump, it was Pelosi not Hillary, which is why I put Hillary in quotations, appears you didn’t process the hint, and the only way a taxpayer paid for it was via her salary, which is her money. JD didn’t directly pay to have the water risen, the government did
You never seem to get anything right
Clinton's hairdressing "budget" came from the taxpayers? Really?
The vast majority of Clinton's money came from the private sector, books and such. Her government salary was tiny by comparison.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
or you could just admit that you have no idea how government officials operate in regards to office budgets. you're really not that dense, are you?
The Secret Service raise the river so they could navigate the river in motorized boats. JD Vance was not consulted and had nothing to do with the Secret Service request to raise the river.“JD Vance went kayaking for his birthday. Secret Service had the river level raised”
“COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Vice President JD Vance’s security detail had an Ohio river’s water level raised last weekend to accommodate a kayaking trip he and his family took to celebrate his 41st birthday.”
“Critics immediately blasted the action as a sign of the vice president’s entitlement, particularly given the Trump administration’s focus on slashing government spending.”
“Richard W. Painter, who served as chief White House ethics lawyer under President George W. Bush, said on X that “it’s outrageous for the Army corps of engineers to spend taxpayer money to increase water flow in a river so @VP can go canoeing when budget cuts to the National Park Service have severely impacted family vacations for everyone else.”
JD Vance went kayaking for his birthday. Secret Service had the river level raised
Vice President JD Vance’s security detail had an Ohio river’s water level raised last weekend to accommodate a kayaking trip he and his family took for his 41st birthday.apnews.com
Poor JD, what was he to do if he didn’t have perfect conditions for him to paddle his kayak
I am sure you feel Clinton's hairdresser is paid for with taxpayer money... But it does not seem like you have any evidence.
She has a very standard hairstyle. Somehow I doubt there is much of a "budget" behind it.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
as i'm sure that you're left wing filters block out any negative reports about democrats, making it impossible for you to exercise any critical thinking. I really can't understand how people like you get on in the world with such ignorance and naivete
Imagine what a great story you would have if you could prove that Clinton has her trips to the hair salon paid for by the taxpayers. Sadly, all you have is the claim that anyone who does not automatically believe you must be "naivete."
OK, why would a retired Senator have the taxpayers pay for her hairstyling? Why would trump allow this?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
are leftists that naive? or just that willfully ignorant when it comes to democrat politicians? I'm reasonably sure that if there was a story out there about Elon or Patel closing a barber shop and paying 500 for a haircut using taxpayer funded budget, you idiots would believe it without a seconds thought, but never a democrat. All that proves is you're way too partisan to grasp the simple concepts of elected or appointed officials office budgets. It shows that most of you have no business debating any sort of economics or governmental budgeting.
So you have no evidence?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
I have common sense. Intelligence. wisdom. things you apparently don't have. I get it, though, most of you mainstreamers require actual video evidence of wrongdoings committed by your favored politicians because you're incapable of using those three things I mentioned. I feel badly for you.
Common sense says that the taxpayers are paying for the current president's hairstylist. I do not know this for a fact, but it is the common sense thing. We are also paying for his chef, his flights, and a lot of other things.
Common sense does not say we are paying for an ex-Senator's hairstylist. Obviously, during her campaigns she probably had her campaigns pay for her hairstylist, and when she was not campaigning, like for the last 9 years, she paid for her own hairstyling.
That is just common sense. But OK, can you prove that a retired Senator is getting a free hairstylist 16 years later.
There are reduced cost hair cuts for men in the Senate, but women do not usually take advantage of that. Looking at Clinton's hairstyle, I doubt she got a men's barber cut. And even if she did, it would not be 16 years later.
So again, where is your evidence?
Remember when you guys had video evidence that Pelosi was drunk? It turned out to have been modified with the original footage not showing her drunk. Remember when you had pictures of trump hanging around with "normal" Blacks? It turned out to be computer generated. There are 60 million or so Blacks in America, who are on average poorer than whites, and he could not find a few willing to take a picture with him for money? Or maybe it is just that trump does not feel comfortable around Blacks?
The reality is that video evidence is no longer as compelling as it used to be. Even if the pee tapes were released today, I would never fully know if they were real.
I would rather see financial documents. You claim that trump, and the republicans are authorizing the spending of taxpayer money on a hairstylist for an ex-Senator... Go ahead and prove it with financial documents.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
so, if I get this right, despite the fact that I included appointed members, you are demanding some evidence that cabinet officials have a budget from taxpayer funds allotted for their office???? Do I have that right????
I have no clue what you are talking about with a drunk pelosi, though there are a few articles out there about her budget items as well.
you are clearly obfuscating the issue by saying that my claim is that republicans are authorizing hillarys budget. I said no such thing. I very clearly said while she was SoS................are you denying that the Secretary of State gets a taxpayer funded office budget??????
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
That’s the nature of the job. What else is he supposed to do?
Clinton has not been a cabinet member in twelve and a half years. Hairstylists would not generally be considered office expenses. Cabinets have surprising little office expenses covered, and must borrow staff from their departments.
So in your conspiracy theory, there is a staff of hairstylists who work for the State Department, and 13 years later style Clinton's hair?
The real person who does Clinton's hair is Isabelle Goetz. She does not work for the taxpayers, though did get a small amount of money from the campaign, when Clinton was campaigning.
Yes, you have no clue.
And she gets to spend it on whatever she wants? Even 13 years later?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
you're clearly the one who has no clue. have fun being ignorant