The constitution - A lesson and debate

Truth Detector

Truth Detector

Well-known member
Contributor
Every time Biden opens his lying mouth, he illustrates his ignorance of what the constitution is. Every time Democrats open their lying mouths they illustrate their ignorance of what the constitution is.

This is a Constitutional lesson missed by our failed leftist educational establishment

The Constitution is not about rights. Our rights are presumed to be God given. The Constitution LIMITS the governments power to intrude on those rights.

That is why gun bans are unconstitutional. Inferring that marriage is a right within the Constitution is false. Inferring that abortion is a right within the Constitution is false.

The 2nd amendment prevents the government from infringing on a God given right. It doesn’t just mean hunting rifles. It doesn’t just mean militia. It is mostly about self defense and preventing tyranny.

When I see idiots like Biden and miscreants like Whoopi Goldberg rant stupidly and ignorantly that the AR15 is not needed to hunt with, they should be slapped until the stupid drops out of them.

The AR15 is the most effective, light weight, easy to operate self defense weapon ever made. Period. So do the planet a favor leftist dunces and STFU about a topic you absolutely know nothing about.
 
Truth Detector said:
Every time Biden opens his lying mouth, he illustrates his ignorance of what the constitution is. Every time Democrats open their lying mouths they illustrate their ignorance of what the constitution is.

This is a Constitutional lesson missed by our failed leftist educational establishment

The Constitution is not about rights. Our rights are presumed to be God given. The Constitution LIMITS the governments power to intrude on those rights.

That is why gun bans are unconstitutional. Inferring that marriage is a right within the Constitution is false. Inferring that abortion is a right within the Constitution is false.

The 2nd amendment prevents the government from infringing on a God given right. It doesn’t just mean hunting rifles. It doesn’t just mean militia. It is mostly about self defense and preventing tyranny.

When I see idiots like Biden and miscreants like Whoopi Goldberg rant stupidly and ignorantly that the AR15 is not needed to hunt with, they should be slapped until the stupid drops out of them.

The AR15 is the most effective, light weight, easy to operate self defense weapon ever made. Period. So do the planet a favor leftist dunces and STFU about a topic you absolutely know nothing about.
Click to expand...

Its a shame you weren't born with any portion of a brain. Had it been so, you could have read the exact Supreme Court wording when ruling on the second amendment. Its not too late to keep from making another ass of yourself.

In short you stupid shit, gun bans in general are illegal but specific weapons can be banned at any time.
 
floridafan said:
Its a shame you weren't born with any portion of a brain. Had it been so, you could have read the exact Supreme Court wording when ruling on the second amendment. Its not too late to keep from making another ass of yourself.

In short you stupid shit, gun bans in general are illegal but specific weapons can be banned at any time.
Click to expand...

the supreme court ignored the constitution, ignored their constitutional limits, and trampled on a basic fundamental right of the people.

In short you stupid shit, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED does not mean reasonable regulations.

nofounderever.jpg
 
1. I think Bullshit Blob would feel a lot better after a lobotomy.
2. The AR-15 is clearly, and by design, an offensive weapon.
 
floridafan said:
If you were a constitutional expert, your opinion might mean something. As it is, in a word, you know shit.
Click to expand...

I am a constitutional expert. you should try reading it yourself instead of having someone you believe is a constitutional expert tell you what it means. that alone tells me you don't know shit.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
I am a constitutional expert. you should try reading it yourself instead of having someone you believe is a constitutional expert tell you what it means. that alone tells me you don't know shit.
Click to expand...

2. Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, con- cealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of fire- arms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.
 
floridafan said:
2. Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, con- cealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of fire- arms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.
Click to expand...

Scalia is not a constitutional expert, obviously. he got it wrong......the framers were very clear that the federal government had zero power or authority over the arms of the people.
 
floridafan said:
Its a shame you weren't born with any portion of a brain.
Click to expand...

You misspelled "I" halfwit. :palm:

floridafan said:
Had it been so, you could have read the exact Supreme Court wording when ruling on the second amendment. Its not too late to keep from making another ass of yourself.
Click to expand...

What ruling was that halfwit?

floridafan said:
In short you stupid shit,
Click to expand...

IRONY; when a stupid shit calls others stupid shit. :palm:

floridafan said:
gun bans in general are illegal but specific weapons can be banned at any time.
Click to expand...

That claim doesn't exist in the Constitution halfwit. :palm:
 
floridafan said:
2. Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, con- cealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of fire- arms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.
Click to expand...

Good effort, but they've even turned on Scalia.
 
Trumptards want to have the right to do anything they want any time they want. They are long on rights, short on responsibility.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top