The Constitution won’t save America- It has lost touch: open

[Into the Night]

if they complied they committed conspiracy to censor.

it's also criminal



this is the libertarian in you denying fascism, and sucking corporate cock, like libertarians always do.

They were 'encouraged' by the government to comply, which means forced. In other words, the federal government violated the 1st amendment.

 

[Into the Night]

if corporations are people, social medias are guilty of conspiracy to censor, a serious crime relating to the first amendment.

Social media companies are not subject to the 1st amendment.
The Democrat party is a conspiracy.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Social media companies are not subject to the 1st amendment.
The Democrat party is a conspiracy.

but they can choose to value free speech.

conspiracy to censor IS a crime tho.

if you facilitate a government crime you're just as liable as if the mafia had come to you to commit a crime.

 

[Into the Night]

but they can choose to value free speech.

conspiracy to censor IS a crime tho.

if you facilitate a government crime you're just as liable as if the mafia had come to you to commit a crime.

It is not a crime for a corporation to censor. It IS a crime for the federal government to 'encourage' or compel them to.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

It is not a crime for a corporation to censor. It IS a crime for the federal government to 'encourage' or compel them to.

being complicit in a government crime is itself a crime.


can your comprehend that, dumbass?

 

[Into the Night]

being complicit in a government crime is itself a crime.


can your comprehend that, dumbass?

No, it isn't. Corporations are NOT subject the 1st amendment. Associative fallacy.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

No, it isn't. Corporations are NOT subject the 1st amendment.

but they are bound to laws. and the law says facilitating another crime in some capacity makes you liable.

conspiracy to commit censorship.


it's legally simple, simpleton.

its like buying alcohol for a minor who's hanging out in the parking lot.

 

[Into the Night]

but they are bound to laws.

There is no such law.

and the law says facilitating another crime in some capacity makes you liable.

Corporations are NOT subject the 1st amendment.

conspiracy to commit censorship.

No such law.

it's legally simple, simpleton.

Manufacturing so-called 'laws' that don't exist, and attempting to apply the Constitution to a private company isn't going to work.

its like buying alcohol for a minor who's hanging out in the parking lot.

False equivalence fallacy. There is no age limit for censorship, and censorship is not for sale at a liquor store.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

There is no such law.

Corporations are NOT subject the 1st amendment.

No such law.

Manufacturing so-called 'laws' that don't exist, and attempting to apply the Constitution to a private company isn't going to work.

False equivalence fallacy. There is no age limit for censorship, and censorship is not for sale at a liquor store.

21 year olds can buy alcohol.

15 year cannot.

a 21 one year old cannot buy alcohol for a fifteen year old, just like corporation cannot censor as a proxy for government forbidden to do so.


the law is supreme.

 

[Into the Night]

21 year olds can buy alcohol.

15 year cannot.

a 21 one year old cannot buy alcohol for a fifteen year old, just like corporation cannot censor as a proxy for government forbidden to do so.


the law is supreme.

False equivalence fallacy. Pivot fallacy.
Censorship is not a drink.

It is not a crime for a corporation to censor. A corporation is not a proxy of government.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

False equivalence fallacy. Pivot fallacy.
Censorship is not a drink.

It is not a crime for a corporation to censor. A corporation is not a proxy of government.

a corporation is a proxy for government when it's commiting crimes on it's behalf and at it's direction.

 

[Flash]

if corporations are people, social medias are guilty of conspiracy to censor, a serious crime relating to the first amendment.

Only government can violate the 1st amendment--not people or social media companies.

 

[Into the Night]

I lived in the ghetto during the crack epidemic. Kids that went to school were able to eat lunch that day. Some schools even started a breakfast program. Parents couldn't be depended on to feed their own kids. It opened my eyes to liberal thinking on government involvement. Not every situation should be left up to the parent.

Liberal thinking on government with kids is to take kids away from parents. It is thinking that Government is God and therefore better than parents.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Only government can violate the 1st amendment--not people or social media companies.

they can if they are facilitating government criminality.

they are facilitating violation of the 1st amendment if they censor at the government behest and direction.

sorry fascist.

 

[Into the Night]

Agreed. I think N.S. Lyons would agree with you as well. The problem is that without a populace that's willing to fight to preserve U.S. freedoms, the constitution can be "interpreted" to mean whatever the Supreme Court likes.

The Supreme Court does not have any authority to change any constitution or even interpret them. It HAS chosen to ignore the Constitution from time to time though. The Constitution itself has not changed.

From what I've read, corporations can censor what's on their platforms.

This is correct.

What the constitution was apparently meant to prevent was the U.S. government bullying them into doing it.

Correct. This is in the 1st amendment.

But apparently the current Supreme Court justices think it's ok, and since they're the top dogs when in comes to interpreting the Constitution, Americans have a serious problem.

The Supreme Court has no authority to interpret or change the Constitution.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

why are libertarians human garbage now?

 

[Into the Night]

they can if they are facilitating government criminality.

they are facilitating violation of the 1st amendment if they censor at the government behest and direction.

sorry fascist.

No. You cannot blame corporations for the act of the government. Corporations are NOT subject to the 1st amendment. The federal government IS.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

No. You cannot blame corporations for the act of the government. Corporations are NOT subject to the 1st amendment. The federal government IS.

if they are acting on behalf of a criminal request from the government they ARE complicit.


take it up with the concept of law.

do you understand that we are no better than fascist totalitarian CHINA if we allow wanton government interference in corporate activities, or corporate interference in government activities?

 

[Flash]

they can if they are facilitating government criminality.

they are facilitating violation of the 1st amendment if they censor at the government behest and direction.

sorry fascist.

What law are they breaking?

If government coerces them the government is committing a crime, not the social media company. They are not violating the 1st amendment.

If government "encourages" a company (not threatens or coerces) to limit posts the company is willingly making that decision and nobody has violated the 1st amendment.

Several times throughout history presidents have asked the press not to print a certain story at that time because it might hurt national security or endanger lives. The press makes the decision whether to publish or not.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

What law are they breaking?

If government coerces them the government is committing a crime, not the social media company. They are not violating the 1st amendment.

If government "encourages" a company (not threatens or coerces) to limit posts the company is willingly making that decision and nobody has violated the 1st amendment.

Several times throughout history presidents have asked the press not to print a certain story at that time because it might hurt national security or endanger lives. The press makes the decision whether to publish or not.

if you are being coerced into a criminal plot it is up to you to blow the whistle asap, not comply.