apple0154
MEOW
so the united nations would be the model for a world government?
It's the right idea but not the perfect model.
so the united nations would be the model for a world government?
And downside of it is the future of all americans traded away so the baby boomers could feel good about being globalist idiots who "love the world". They are traitors.
AssHat, if some form of equality is not forthcoming there will continue to be wars and now the weapons are just too powerful. We need a different approach.
You just a want a permanent war on all poor people around the globe, including the americans you push into poverty. We will always have rule by force. Don't get distracted by phony propaganda frames.
Having separate nations is not the cause of war, war is caused by lust for power, and greed, all of which globalization will enhance, and foment.
One problem with your reasoning here: BUSINESS does not vote. PEOPLE vote and it is the PEOPLE who are trapped into depending on government assistance. As I have said, it simply can NOT be by accident that almost every government assistance program has the exact same design which punishes people for trying to better themselves. The only consistent exceptions are education assistance programs.That's not how I see it.
Regarding UI the government makes the rules but if businesses, being contributors to UI, don't like the rules they won't vote for that government again. The rules were to appease business, not to keep people in poverty.
Try asking people on assistance how they feel about themselves. Ask them how they feel when working that extra shift for an extra $100 ends up putting them back over $200 in their total budget because of the ridiculous regulations. MOST people want to make their own way. A system that does not allow them to is a large part of the despondency we see in people who are long time recipients.Just look at the way people regard anyone on government assistance. Or better yet, look at how people feel about paying taxes towards helping them.
Yet millions of normal healthy people DO, because they have the option of that extra $100 in wages, or $200 in assistance. They do not want to suffer (more than they already do), so which do they choose?It's human nature to want to improve ones life, to have "extras". Either people have physical/mental/drug problems or they hit a stroke of bad luck. Normal, healthy people do not want to suffer and that's the life on government assistance.
Not once have I said we should stop assistance. I have specifically said I have no problems at all with helping those in need. But YES, there are SERIOUS problems in the way current government assistance programs are designed, and we desperately need to fix those problems.The solution is not to stop the assistance. The solution is to find the problem and fix it.
Riiight: daughter of a white construction worker. Moving all over. POOR wittoo ootsums. Moving around indicates your daddy had work, or he wouldn't have been moving, would he? How many times did YOU go without a meal in your belly because the larder was empty?HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Do you really think no white people grow up poor?
Yeah Im white and a woman.
Why is it you think I was not raised poor?
I am sixth out of eight kids of a construction worker, grew up all over socal moving every year.
You dont own your "I was the one who made it out" crown as king.
Why do you think I came out of my poverty (every one of my bros and sis's made it too) with such a respect for poor people and you see them as leaches to be scorned?
I think it may have something to do with that self hate element I mentioned earlier.
Find a little kindness in your heart for the kids now following the poverty path you had to live would you?
It's the right idea but not the perfect model.
Who's goals?
One problem with your reasoning here: BUSINESS does not vote. PEOPLE vote and it is the PEOPLE who are trapped into depending on government assistance. As I have said, it simply can NOT be by accident that almost every government assistance program has the exact same design which punishes people for trying to better themselves. The only consistent exceptions are education assistance programs.
Try asking people on assistance how they feel about themselves. Ask them how they feel when working that extra shift for an extra $100 ends up putting them back over $200 in their total budget because of the ridiculous regulations. MOST people want to make their own way. A system that does not allow them to is a large part of the despondency we see in people who are long time recipients.
Not once have I said we should stop assistance. I have specifically said I have no problems at all with helping those in need. But YES, there are SERIOUS problems in the way current government assistance programs are designed, and we desperately need to fix those problems.
then what model is perfect? do we go for constitutional rights or positivity? do 'we the people' of the entire world create the one world government, or do we let supposedly superior intellectuals who are already government leaders create our new world government?
The people who we vote for will represent us on the world stage.
that only answers part of the question. please expand
Riiight: daughter of a white construction worker. Moving all over. POOR wittoo ootsums. Moving around indicates your daddy had work, or he wouldn't have been moving, would he? How many times did YOU go without a meal in your belly because the larder was empty?
Typical entitlist bitch thinking because you didn't run around in Mercedes Benz you were poor. As I first stated, very few of you people actually know what REAL poverty is. It sure as hell is not where we draw the so-called poverty line.
Not to mention the typical white liberal, SO sympathetic to the problems of minorities. You haven't a fucking CLUE, and the fucking LIES you spew, playing the race card constantly, just shows that racism is alive and well, and living in modern liberalism.
People vote for a Mayor. They vote for their district. They vote for their regional government (State, Province). They vote for their country leader (President or Prime Minister). Their country leader then votes along with other country leaders on global concerns.
it's simply an unavoidable sideeffect of reality.....what are you going to do, prevent a Chinese man from working?......tell a Sudanese he can't take a job to feed his children?.....if a man in Haiti can earn a living making something, he's going to go make it....
The people who we vote for will represent us on the world stage.
Why would globalization result in one fighting against themselves? You're not making sense.
People vote for a Mayor. They vote for their district. They vote for their regional government (State, Province). They vote for their country leader (President or Prime Minister). Their country leader then votes along with other country leaders on global concerns.
Riiight: daughter of a white construction worker. Moving all over. POOR wittoo ootsums. Moving around indicates your daddy had work, or he wouldn't have been moving, would he? How many times did YOU go without a meal in your belly because the larder was empty?
Typical entitlist bitch thinking because you didn't run around in Mercedes Benz you were poor. As I first stated, very few of you people actually know what REAL poverty is. It sure as hell is not where we draw the so-called poverty line.
Not to mention the typical white liberal, SO sympathetic to the problems of minorities. You haven't a fucking CLUE, and the fucking LIES you spew, playing the race card constantly, just shows that racism is alive and well, and living in modern liberalism.