The Democratic Agenda and what to expect

That's your rebuttal? How weak. But, I cannot say I am surprised. When liberals are slapped with the facts they typically run away. ;)

Jack: "The Obama administration faced one investigation after another. Benghazi, just to name one. " This was MY statement.
TD: "What investigations into Obama's personal affairs did Republican engage in snowflake? Be specific." <-------- This is YOUR statement.

:) See. You're NOT responding to MY statement. You're making up a statement that you want to rebut, ... then you are responding to THAT statement you just made up. :)
So, I have NO PROBLEM with you just making stuff up, getting your panties in a wad, and spinning and twirling around in a tizzy. ... Jack doesn't have any time for it though.
 
Wait a minute, suddenly the same obstruction and delay that McConnell employed throughout the Obama years to "make sure he is a one term President" is now "fascism" when the Democrats do something similar? How does that work?

And political investigations, which was pretty much all the GOP Congress did continuously for eight years is now "demagoguing?"

Hate to tell there "truthie," but the GOP laid down the precedent for all this eleven years ago so don't start crying now cause Trump is your messiah

(time for the personal crapola and corny videos)

It looks like TD "Can't Handle The Truth". :laugh:
 
Most people with a brain know that Pelosi and Schumer WANTED a shut down and were perfectly happy to allow one to occur. Trump can't possibly do it alone because the House has to pass the spending bill.

We're not talking about most people "with a brain." We're talking about most people. The general population blames Trump for the shutdown.

Is it Congresses job to ensure that a President cannot honor a campaign pledge to protect the nation? These are the same people who told us that protecting the border and preventing illegal immigration was imperative. What changed?

Well for starters, immigration numbers (both legal and illegal) have been steadily dropping. And immigrants commit less crime, on average, than Americans. So this isn't the urgent problem that it used to be.
And most Democrats still believe in border security, they just think the wall is a waste of money. Especially since most illegal immigrants come here be plane.
 
Jack: "The Obama administration faced one investigation after another. Benghazi, just to name one. " This was MY statement.
TD: "What investigations into Obama's personal affairs did Republican engage in snowflake? Be specific." <-------- This is YOUR statement.

:) See. You're NOT responding to MY statement. You're making up a statement that you want to rebut, ... then you are responding to THAT statement you just made up. :)
So, I have NO PROBLEM with you just making stuff up, getting your panties in a wad, and spinning and twirling around in a tizzy. ... Jack doesn't have any time for it though.

I see that you are not comprehending the REALITY Jack. The investigations the Democrats are engaging in are NOTHING like the Obama years and have nothing to do with any actual events or criminality. They are a massive fishing expedition based on hyperbole, innuendo and the FACT that they don't like the man.

The House can pass NOTHING without working with the Senate. The Democrats do not control it. So if they want to be serious about passing legislation, they HAVE to work with Trump and the Republican controlled Senate.

OR, they can act like petulant little children and engage in useless investigations that will lead to nowhere.
 
I see that you are not comprehending the REALITY Jack. The investigations the Democrats are engaging in are NOTHING like the Obama years and have nothing to do with any actual events or criminality. They are a massive fishing expedition based on hyperbole, innuendo and the FACT that they don't like the man.

The House can pass NOTHING without working with the Senate. The Democrats do not control it. So if they want to be serious about passing legislation, they HAVE to work with Trump and the Republican controlled Senate.

OR, they can act like petulant little children and engage in useless investigations that will lead to nowhere.

And then he doubles down on the same inanity

So now you are trying to tell us the ten years of continuous redundant GOP "investigations" into anything Obama/Hillary weren't "massive fishing expedition based on hyperbole, innuendo and the FACT that they don't like the man," and of course women. Hell, even McCarthy admitted such

Live with it, what goes around comes around, you can blame Mitch, John, and Paul for Trump's current Congressional difficulties
 
And then he doubles down on the same inanity

So now you are trying to tell us the ten years of continuous redundant GOP "investigations" into anything Obama/Hillary weren't "massive fishing expedition based on hyperbole, innuendo and the FACT that they don't like the man," and of course women. Hell, even McCarthy admitted such

Live with it, what goes around comes around, you can blame Mitch, John, and Paul for Trump's current Congressional difficulties

No they were not you fucking moron; Benghazi actually happened. Fast and Furious actually happened. Private e-mail servers are illegal for Government work.

If you had a fucking brain and weren't a hyper partisan hack with a low IQ, you could comprehend the difference.
 
I see that you are not comprehending the REALITY Jack. The investigations the Democrats are engaging in are NOTHING like the Obama years and have nothing to do with any actual events or criminality. They are a massive fishing expedition based on hyperbole, innuendo and the FACT that they don't like the man.

The House can pass NOTHING without working with the Senate. The Democrats do not control it. So if they want to be serious about passing legislation, they HAVE to work with Trump and the Republican controlled Senate.

OR, they can act like petulant little children and engage in useless investigations that will lead to nowhere.

TDS: "I see that you are not comprehending the REALITY Jack. The investigations the Democrats are engaging in are NOTHING like the Obama years and have nothing to do with any actual events or criminality. They are a massive fishing expedition based on hyperbole, innuendo and the FACT that they don't like the man."

Jack: You should be a Comedian. This is funny!

TD: "OR, they can act like petulant little children and engage in useless investigations that will lead to nowhere."
Jack: Like the Republicans did to the Obama Administration? :laugh:


(Dude, are you pranking me?)
 
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha ..........
God! This SO reminds me of TurtleBoy and his "We will make Obama a one-term President". Along with ALL the Republican 'investigations'.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ....

Truth Deflector equals hypocrite.
 
Hold on a minute; you think the political opposition wants the other guys to have two terms? How fucking dense are you? :laugh:



What investigations into Obama's personal affairs did Republican engage in snowflake? Be specific.

Judge Starr, dickfuck. Trey Howdy.
Hypocritical twat.
 
No they were not you fucking moron; Benghazi actually happened. Fast and Furious actually happened. Private e-mail servers are illegal for Government work.

If you had a fucking brain and weren't a hyper partisan hack with a low IQ, you could comprehend the difference.

Are daft, sure the events happened, but the right wing inneundos and conspiracies that perpetuated ten years of GOP "investigations" and 24/7 litigation in the right wing media never happened. Need proof, they were at it for ten years straight, and nothing, zilch, zero was ever proven, so either they all are the worst investigators in history or none of the inneundos actually existed. Common sense dictates the later
 
It's out now. The Democrats have ZERO interest in real legislating or doing the job their constituents sent them to Washington to do. They do not care about the American people, foreign policy, risks presented by despotic regimes or protecting our borders.

They believe that their job is to obstruct and investigate this President; and, for no other reason than they don't like the fact that they lost.

This is a new low in our politics. But then, when it comes to setting new lows, the Democratic Party of the Jackass leads the way.

A day after the State of the Union address, House Democrats responded Wednesday by launching a counter-agenda, including a series of investigations into the Trump administration and legislation they hope will send a compelling message to voters ahead of the 2020 election.

Democrats this week will hold nearly half a dozen investigative hearings into Trump administration officials and programs, and convene even more panels to discuss policy issues such as climate change, universal background checks for gun purchases and campaign finance reform — all partisan initiatives.



The Democratic agenda will include three House floor votes on major bills by the end of March, according to tentative plans shared by Democratic sources. The bills include HR 1, a plan to reform the campaign finance system and enact changes to the elections process; HR7, a bill to that would attempt to ensure equal pay for men and women; and HR 8, a bill to require universal background checks before people can buy guns.

All three have been championed by Democrats, but stand little chance of getting support in the GOP-controlled Senate.


So what is the point if the Senate is not going to part of their legislation? Campaign slogan-ism/rhetoric? How does that create a single job in this nation? How does that increase anyone's pay or opportunity in this country? Obviously the ONLY thing the Party of the Jackass cares about is consolidating it's control over the citizens and political power.

https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-democrats-investigations-20190206-story.html

2011 version of this post:
It's out now. The Republicans have ZERO interest in real legislating or doing the job their constituents sent them to Washington to do. They do not care about the American people, fixing healthcare, climate change, or recovering from the recession.

They believe that their job is to obstruct and investigate this President; and, for no other reason than they don't like the fact that they lost.

This is a new low in our politics. But then, when it comes to setting new lows, the Republican Party of the rich leads the way.

A day after the State of the Union address, House Republicans responded Wednesday by launching a counter-agenda, including a series of investigations into the Obama administration and legislation they hope will send a compelling message to voters ahead of the 2010 election.

Republicans this week will hold nearly half a dozen investigative hearings into Obama administration officials and programs, and convene even more panels to discuss policy issues such as voter fraud, repealing Obamacare, and the national debt — all partisan initiatives.
 
Are daft, sure the events happened, but the right wing inneundos and conspiracies that perpetuated ten years of GOP "investigations" and 24/7 litigation in the right wing media never happened. Need proof, they were at it for ten years straight, and nothing, zilch, zero was ever proven, so either they all are the worst investigators in history or none of the inneundos actually existed. Common sense dictates the later

How was Benghazi a conspiracy? How was Fast and Furious a conspiracy? How was the IRS targeting of Conservatives a conspiracy?

What is obvious is what a fucking brain dead lunatic you are and why no one can expect you to have an intelligent post.
 
2011 version of this post:
It's out now. The Republicans have ZERO interest in real legislating or doing the job their constituents sent them to Washington to do. They do not care about the American people, fixing healthcare, climate change, or recovering from the recession.

They believe that their job is to obstruct and investigate this President; and, for no other reason than they don't like the fact that they lost.

This is a new low in our politics. But then, when it comes to setting new lows, the Republican Party of the rich leads the way.

A day after the State of the Union address, House Republicans responded Wednesday by launching a counter-agenda, including a series of investigations into the Obama administration and legislation they hope will send a compelling message to voters ahead of the 2010 election.

Republicans this week will hold nearly half a dozen investigative hearings into Obama administration officials and programs, and convene even more panels to discuss policy issues such as voter fraud, repealing Obamacare, and the national debt — all partisan initiatives.


Link us up dumbfuck; how are those even remotely the same as what the morons in the Party of the Jackass doing to Trump?
 
Let's review; these are REAL scandals snowflakes. These weren't based on fishing expeditions based on hyperbole, personal character assassination or fabricated bullshit about Russians getting Trump elected:

Republican investigation finds that Obama administration misled Congress on possible Iranian access to U.S. financial system
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.6bb10f493377

List of allegations of misuse of the Internal Revenue Service
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_allegations_of_misuse_of_the_Internal_Revenue_Service

Secret Obama-era permit let Iran convert funds to dollars
https://apnews.com/27e8179cf10140dca7eb86b3488f01e2

U.S. compound attack in Benghazi
https://www.cbsnews.com/feature/us-consulate-attack-in-benghazi/

Emails Show Susan Rice Prepped To Lie By White House
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/benghazi-emails-white-house-prepped-susan-rice/

But her emails? You’re dang right her emails.
We also learned new details about Clinton’s recklessness and willful misconduct in using her private email. The final version of Comey’s statement did note that Clinton “used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related emails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries.” But we did not know at the time that the original draft included one more sentence: “That use included an email exchange with the President while Secretary Clinton was on the territory of such an adversary.” According to the inspector general, “This reference later was changed to ‘another senior government official,’ and ultimately was omitted.”

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news...ton-emails-fbi-comey-0621-20180620-story.html

'Fast And Furious' Just Might Be President Obama's Watergate
https://www.forbes.com/sites/realsp...t-be-president-obamas-watergate/#4877f2cf752a
 
Back
Top