Religion itself was never the issue with me, but rather the conditions under which it's embraced.
Is believing in God important to those who do?
Assuming it is, what other very important thing might they believe on the exact same quality of evidence?
The practical thing is to process what we observe, not ponder possibilities that don't conform to natural possibility.
Yes, we discover more about what may be possible every day,
but we've discovered nothing that even hints at the likelihood d of a supreme being.
Then we make it worse by suggesting a deity that's both omnipotent and all-loving,
where mere observation of the universe proves beyond doubt that those things could not have been concurrently true.