The Enduring Mystery of Tulsi Gabbard

nolongertolerant

Verified User
If Democrats had an ounce of brains Gabbard would be their nominee. She is the whole package. Even Independent Conservatives find her a good candidate.

The Enduring Mystery of Tulsi Gabbard

The 38-year-old presidential contender does not fit any “conventional” political profile.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/09/tulsi-gabbard-2020-candidate/597226/

"“If you think this was all some grand strategy, it wasn't, I promise,” Gabbard said.

Good politicians are smooth. Gabbard is beyond smooth. She’s unflappable to the point of being confounding, even to the many people I spoke with who have worked with her for years in Washington, D.C., and at home in Hawaii. She may be the most elusive candidate running for president, with a campaign that has followed none of the rules of conventional or contemporary politics, and a small but committed group of supporters.

During the first Democratic debate, in June, Gabbard took Representative Tim Ryan’s legs out from under him over his support for the war in Afghanistan; in the days after, she defended former Vice President Joe Biden against Senator Kamala Harris’s attack on his views about busing. At the second debate, in July, Gabbard clotheslined Harris with details about her record as California attorney general. That night, according to Google, Gabbard was the most-searched candidate.

Some of Gabbard’s appeal is straightforward: People are drawn to her when she talks about “the cost of war” and when she says she’d commit America to peaceful noninterventionism. “I don't see anyone who has the depth and conviction and commitment that I bring to stand up to the foreign-policy establishment, the military-industrial complex, and have the courage to bring about an end to these wasteful wars that have plagued both Democratic and Republican administrations,” Gabbard told me."
 
I'm not sure America is going to Vote for a Hare Krishna or some Gay guy. (just an opinion)

Religion should not be a deciding factor in electing someone. Unless maybe a Satan Worshiper or something like that. She has a very impressive record and demeanor.
 
Just trying to appeal to the progressives.

"Gabbard was raised in a multicultural and multireligious household. Her father is of Samoan and European ancestry and an active lector at his Catholic church. Her mother, who was born in Decatur, Indiana, is of German descent and a practicing Hindu. Gabbard chose Hinduism as her religion while she was a teenager."
 
If Democrats had an ounce of brains Gabbard would be their nominee. She is the whole package. Even Independent Conservatives find her a good candidate.

The Enduring Mystery of Tulsi Gabbard

The 38-year-old presidential contender does not fit any “conventional” political profile.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/09/tulsi-gabbard-2020-candidate/597226/

"“If you think this was all some grand strategy, it wasn't, I promise,” Gabbard said.

Good politicians are smooth. Gabbard is beyond smooth. She’s unflappable to the point of being confounding, even to the many people I spoke with who have worked with her for years in Washington, D.C., and at home in Hawaii. She may be the most elusive candidate running for president, with a campaign that has followed none of the rules of conventional or contemporary politics, and a small but committed group of supporters.

During the first Democratic debate, in June, Gabbard took Representative Tim Ryan’s legs out from under him over his support for the war in Afghanistan; in the days after, she defended former Vice President Joe Biden against Senator Kamala Harris’s attack on his views about busing. At the second debate, in July, Gabbard clotheslined Harris with details about her record as California attorney general. That night, according to Google, Gabbard was the most-searched candidate.

Some of Gabbard’s appeal is straightforward: People are drawn to her when she talks about “the cost of war” and when she says she’d commit America to peaceful noninterventionism. “I don't see anyone who has the depth and conviction and commitment that I bring to stand up to the foreign-policy establishment, the military-industrial complex, and have the courage to bring about an end to these wasteful wars that have plagued both Democratic and Republican administrations,” Gabbard told me."

Most people who serve during a war will be against further wars so that stance is nothing out of the ordinary, but I have a problem with this....

In the middle of this brutal dictator’s revenge, Gabbard broke with House Democrats to take a secret trip to Syria in January 2017. Her trip was organized by members of the Syrian Social Nationalist Party, who are Assad sympathizers. Claiming this was a “fact-finding” trip, Gabbard went not to protest the torture of political prisoners in Assad’s dungeons or to demand accountability for the destruction the regime had wrought on cities across the country—but to meet with the dictator himself.

After her trip, Gabbard parroted the regime’s lies about the war. “I return to Washington, D.C., with even greater resolve to end our illegal war to overthrow the Syrian government,” she said. She used her platform to help Assad spread his propaganda, claiming there was no evidence he used chemical weapons against his people, and then dropping the issue once the evidence was presented that he, in fact, did—without ever admitting she was wrong or following through with her promise to hold him accountable once there was proof. In short, Gabbard has gaslit the already-traumatized Syrian people.

Gabbard’s support for fascist strongmen does not stop at Syria. She has met with others including Abdel Fattah el-Sisi of Egypt and Narendra Modi of India, and she has even been honored by right-wing pro-Israel forces at the World Values Network’s gala, which was co-hosted by influential Republican donor Sheldon Adelson.

And she was the first and only Democrat to meet with Trump after he was elected, when she was reportedly under consideration for a position in his administration. She is so loved by right-wing figures that she has received support from Richard Spencer, Steve Bannon, and Fox News’ Tucker Carlson.

https://rewire.news/article/2019/01/24/gabbard-is-no-progressive-foreign-policy/
 
If Democrats had an ounce of brains Gabbard would be their nominee. She is the whole package. Even Independent Conservatives find her a good candidate.

The Enduring Mystery of Tulsi Gabbard

The 38-year-old presidential contender does not fit any “conventional” political profile.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/09/tulsi-gabbard-2020-candidate/597226/

"“If you think this was all some grand strategy, it wasn't, I promise,” Gabbard said.

Good politicians are smooth. Gabbard is beyond smooth. She’s unflappable to the point of being confounding, even to the many people I spoke with who have worked with her for years in Washington, D.C., and at home in Hawaii. She may be the most elusive candidate running for president, with a campaign that has followed none of the rules of conventional or contemporary politics, and a small but committed group of supporters.

During the first Democratic debate, in June, Gabbard took Representative Tim Ryan’s legs out from under him over his support for the war in Afghanistan; in the days after, she defended former Vice President Joe Biden against Senator Kamala Harris’s attack on his views about busing. At the second debate, in July, Gabbard clotheslined Harris with details about her record as California attorney general. That night, according to Google, Gabbard was the most-searched candidate.

Some of Gabbard’s appeal is straightforward: People are drawn to her when she talks about “the cost of war” and when she says she’d commit America to peaceful noninterventionism. “I don't see anyone who has the depth and conviction and commitment that I bring to stand up to the foreign-policy establishment, the military-industrial complex, and have the courage to bring about an end to these wasteful wars that have plagued both Democratic and Republican administrations,” Gabbard told me."

Gabbard would be a very good president, but she won't beat Trump. People vote based on how entertaining the candidates are. Gabbard doesn't have the larger than life personality that gets votes.
 
To early for me to decide who I will be voting for yet. If it were to be a Democrat though, at this point, she would be the only one I would consider.

OK. Let's say you have three choices: a Fag, a Hare Krishna, or Bernie Sanders.
See! Bernie is looking pretty good about now.


:thumbsup:
 
Gabbard would be a very good president, but she won't beat Trump. People vote based on how entertaining the candidates are. Gabbard doesn't have the larger than life personality that gets votes.

Which is what the article talks about. And what is just another thing appealing about her to many.
 
To early for me to decide who I will be voting for yet. If it were to be a Democrat though, at this point, she would be the only one I would consider.

You are either DONALD FUCKING TRUMP all the way- or NEVER DONALD TRUMP!

If you think you can have it both ways- YOU ARE A FUCKING IDIOT!

I suspect you are a DONALD TRUMP all-the-way just trying to be antagonistic!

Most people did not like the way she grandstanded and attacked and accused other Democrats wrongly during her time on the debate stage. Her attacks were not even based on facts but were more of delusions. Her attacks were proven to be not accurate.

It never hurts to compare you policies with other candidates, but she came across to most viewers as unnecessarily spiteful, vindictive, and mean spirited about it and taking it over-the-top. Those are not the attributes we want from our Democratic nominee.

That kind of hateful behavior only appeals to idiots- LIKE YOU OPIE AND ALL OF YOU IDIOT DONALD TRUMP SUPPORTERS!

And so she is paying the price for her bad performance by not ever getting anymore interest in her since her debates.

BTW, Stick with Donald Trump!

He will need your vote- WE DON'T!
 
Last edited:
You are either DONALD FUCKING TRUMP all the way- or NEVER DONALD TRUMP!

If you think you can have it both ways- YOU ARE A FUCKING IDIOT!

I suspect you are a DONALD TRUMP all-the-way just trying to be antagonistic!

Most people did not like the way she grandstanded and attacked and accused other Democrats wrongly during her time on the debate stage.

It doesn't never hurts to compare you policies with other candidates, but she came across to most viewers as unnecessarily spiteful, vindictive, and mean spirited about it and taking it over-the-top. Those are not the attributes we want from our Democratic nominee.

That kind of hateful behavior only appeals to idiots- LIKE YOU OPIE AND ALL OF YOU IDIOT DONALD TRUMP SUPPORTERS!

And so she is paying the price for her bad performance by not ever getting anymore interest in her since her debates.

BTW, Stick with Donald Trump!

He will need your vote- WE DON'T!

I have yet to meet an intelligent liberal on this board. You have not changed that.
 
There is only truth in that statement. Do not really care much about a persons religion or sexual preference. I am concerned with political ideologies.

That's very commendable. Do you care about 'electability'?
How many people are going to Vote for someone that they remember meeting at an Airport ringing a small bell and that possibly Scotty just beamed down?
 
Back
Top