The Firearms Statistics That Gun Control Advocates Don’t Want to See

RockX

Banned
To accompany TheBlaze's coverage of the National Rifle Association's annual meeting in Houston, we figured it could be helpful to share some gun statistics pointed out to us by some of the NRA Convention attendees. Forget the talking points used by both sides in the gun control debate; we're going to be talking about verified statistics.


Gun control advocates be advised, these are not the statistics you are looking for.


According to data from the FBI's uniform crime reports, California had the highest number of gun murders in 2011 with 1,220 -- which makes up 68 percent of all murders in the state that year and equates to 3.25 murders per 100,000 people.


The irony of such a grisly distinction is evident when you look at which state was named the state with the strongest gun control laws in 2011 by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. You guessed it -- it was California.


"What is very unusual is that California also has a program by which we can remove guns, recover guns from people who have a gun and then subsequently become prohibited or dangerous," Brady Campaign spokeswoman Amanda Wilcox said at the time.


It should be noted, though, that California is also one of the biggest states in the country, with a population of about about 37 million. Therefore, it might make sense that it would have a high number of murders but its murder rate is still high as gun control has had a seemingly inconsequential impact. In comparison, Texas has a population of about 25.6 million and saw 699 total gun murders in 2011 -- nearly half that of California -- and a firearms murder rate of 2.91 per 100,000.


In 2011, Utah, the state that the Brady Campaign determined had the least gun control, experienced just 26 gun murders and a firearms murder rate of 0.97. Utah has a population 2.8 million.


But if you look at the data another way -- murders per 100,000 people -- another gun control haven tops the list.


The FBI data also notes that Washington, D.C. had the highest murder rate per 100,000 people. The nation's capital saw 12 gun murders per 100,000 in 2011. DC also finished first in gun-related robberies per 100,000 people - with 242.56.


In 1976, the District of Columbia required all guns be registered, banned new handguns and required guns at home to be stored and dissembled or locked up. Unfortunately, the draconian measures -- which lasted more than three decades -- didn't had the desired effect.


Journalist and attorney Jeffrey Scott Shapiro explains the not-so-surprising result in an op-ed published in the Wall Street Journal on Jan. 15, 2013:
The gun ban had an unintended effect: It emboldened criminals because they knew that law-abiding District residents were unarmed and powerless to defend themselves. Violent crime increased after the law was enacted, with homicides rising to 369 in 1988, from 188 in 1976 when the ban started. By 1993, annual homicides had reached 454.
[...]
Since the gun ban was struck down, murders in the District have steadily gone down, from 186 in 2008 to 88 in 2012, the lowest number since the law was enacted in 1976.
Though it should be noted that the gun murders started decreasing in 1994.


Today, Washington, D.C. still has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. And yet again, the gun murder rate remains dramatically high, the highest in the United States in fact.


So, do the numbers indicate that gun control is the answer to gun violence? You decide.

:awesome:

http://news.yahoo.com/firearms-statistics-gun-control-advocates-don-t-want-194040384.html
 
Who said the guns involved were bought in California? They were probably bought out of state from background check exempt sources and brought in
 
Or, and this is a crazy thought I know, those laws DON'T WORK.

Yeah....let's not try....let's just give up. I think if background checks were universal at the Federal Level....it's a solid mechanism to see how deep the rabbit hole goes as far as gun show, private sales, and straw purchases feeding our criminal element....WITHOUT causing anything more than an inconvenience to law abiding firearms owners.

I still like the idea of having it tied to your driver's license/photo ID....then you wouldn't have to do the paperwork for every sale/purchase.
 
Who said the guns involved were bought in California? They were probably bought out of state from background check exempt sources and brought in

What bullshit...you'll create any fantasy in you're little mind to convince yourself the leftie nitwits are not wrong when FACTS prove they are wrong.

Typical pinhead.
 
Yeah....let's not try....let's just give up. I think if background checks were universal at the Federal Level....it's a solid mechanism to see how deep the rabbit hole goes as far as gun show, private sales, and straw purchases feeding our criminal element....WITHOUT causing anything more than an inconvenience to law abiding firearms owners.

I still like the idea of having it tied to your driver's license/photo ID....then you wouldn't have to do the paperwork for every sale/purchase.

No, wrong again....lets just stop punishing the innocent and law abiding and admit that no laws, from gun laws to jay walking laws will stop crime....not ever.
All the fucking "Gun Free Zone" signs or "Drug Free Zone" signs, etc. don't do shit to prevent anything. Don't you pinheads have any common sense at all ?
Are you all that disconnected from reality ?

Are you that stupid to think that any law will stop gun sales out of the trunks of cars ? ALL laws create an inconvenience to law abiding citizens, and absolutely none to criminals.
 
No, wrong again....lets just stop punishing the innocent and law abiding and admit that no laws, from gun laws to jay walking laws will stop crime....not ever.
All the fucking "Gun Free Zone" signs or "Drug Free Zone" signs, etc. don't do shit to prevent anything. Don't you pinheads have any common sense at all ?
Are you all that disconnected from reality ?

Are you that stupid to think that any law will stop gun sales out of the trunks of cars ? ALL laws create an inconvenience to law abiding citizens, and absolutely none to criminals.

Blah. Blahblah, blahfuckingblah....same tired bullshit. If you were an innocent and law abiding citizen, you wouldn't give a shit about filling out a god damned form.

I think you're either a convict or a supplier. Those are the only two types of people who should have a problem with background checks....if you think that's a punishment, your insane....which is the other possible type of person who would be ineligible.... so there's that.

And STY? The boogeyman is in your closet.
 
What bullshit...you'll create any fantasy in you're little mind to convince yourself the leftie nitwits are not wrong when FACTS prove they are wrong.

Typical pinhead.

Didn't you start a thread the other day about Obama claims about guns in Mexico? And didn't I post a link proving him right?

crime prevention was never the ultimate goal with these 'laws' anyway.


And assault weapons were never meant to shoot deer.
 
Blah. Blahblah, blahfuckingblah....same tired bullshit. If you were an innocent and law abiding citizen, you wouldn't give a shit about filling out a god damned form.

I think you're either a convict or a supplier. Those are the only two types of people who should have a problem with background checks....if you think that's a punishment, your insane....which is the other possible type of person who would be ineligible.... so there's that.

And STY? The boogeyman is in your closet.

By your "reasoning"; you must be a convicted drunk or else you would be for all vehicles being equipped with an ignition lockout device.
 
Blah. Blahblah, blahfuckingblah....same tired bullshit. If you were an innocent and law abiding citizen, you wouldn't give a shit about filling out a god damned form.

I think you're either a convict or a supplier. Those are the only two types of people who should have a problem with background checks....if you think that's a punishment, your insane....which is the other possible type of person who would be ineligible.... so there's that.

And STY? The boogeyman is in your closet.
it is not the governments business to know any damned thing about the firearms of we the people. something you statists just can't seem to get over is that whole freedom thing. begging for slavery.
 
O8cTD9F.jpg
 
Blah. Blahblah, blahfuckingblah....same tired bullshit. If you were an innocent and law abiding citizen, you wouldn't give a shit about filling out a god damned form.

I think you're either a convict or a supplier. Those are the only two types of people who should have a problem with background checks....if you think that's a punishment, your insane....which is the other possible type of person who would be ineligible.... so there's that.

And STY? The boogeyman is in your closet.


I'll spell it out AGAIN just for you idiots that can't understand plain English....not only is it more bullshit for the law abiding citizens....

I T D O N' T F U C K I N' W O R K.... CRIMINALS DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT LAWS.
 
Didn't you start a thread the other day about Obama claims about guns in Mexico? And didn't I post a link proving him right?

And assault weapons were never meant to shoot deer.


The 2nd amendment is NOT about hunting you idiot...how many times do you have to be reminded of that simple fact.....

And Obama blaming the US for guns in Mexico is a joke....it was his ATF and idiot Attorney General that are responsible for 10's of thousands
of guns getting to Mexico....simply closing the border except to appropriate entry points would put a stop to most of that .....something else
he won't do.

What you usually do is post a link you don't understand that proves me right and claim the opposite....but I kinda like that about you.
 
By your "reasoning"; you must be a convicted drunk or else you would be for all vehicles being equipped with an ignition lockout device.


Its an analogy to point out how stupid it is to lump legal law abiding citizens in with criminals that don't give a shit about you inane laws....
 
I'll spell it out AGAIN just for you idiots that can't understand plain English....not only is it more bullshit for the law abiding citizens....

I T D O N' T F U C K I N' W O R K.... CRIMINALS DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT LAWS.

Yeah....because they can go to a gun show in Arizona, Nevada or another state and pick them up without background checks...or....in NY, they can go to Ohio, or PA....in Chicago, they can go to any of the surrounding states.

What you don't get is that background checks aren't hurting you one bit, the bill proposed purposely put in an item that would make a National Registry illegal, and closed a huge method that people who legally aren't allowed 2nd Amendment rights use to get them despite their ineligibility.

Now... you wanna yell some more?
 
Back
Top