The Gay Debate

... or has any intelligence at all. It's what he does. Throw out unsubstatiated crap and pretend he's knows what he's talking about.

Are you for teaching anal sex to children in elementary school? Just hypothetically. Answer the question.
 
Gee, nobody wants to answer the anal sex in elementary sex ed question. That's cuz it IS the agenda and they don't want to seem uncool. But they also don't want to feel dirty by saying it out loud, because it IS dirty, and sick, and foul. Kids don't need that notion in their heads at that age.
 
Gee, nobody wants to answer the anal sex in elementary sex ed question. That's cuz it IS the agenda and they don't want to seem uncool. But they also don't want to feel dirty by saying it out loud, because it IS dirty, and sick, and foul. Kids don't need that notion in their heads at that age.

And YOU appear to be the only one suggesting it is part of some agenda or other. IHHO. it is an idiotic idea to even suggest that it is part of the "agenda".
 
And YOU appear to be the only one suggesting it is part of some agenda or other. IHHO. it is an idiotic idea to even suggest that it is part of the "agenda".

And Im the only one willing to say it's wrong. Everyone else is afraid to, I assert that's because it IS The agenda, and they don't want to seem "backward", but yet they get to ill to defend it, because they have a shred of decency somewhere within them. DId you understand it this time?
 
Gee, nobody wants to answer the anal sex in elementary sex ed question. That's cuz it IS the agenda and they don't want to seem uncool. But they also don't want to feel dirty by saying it out loud, because it IS dirty, and sick, and foul. Kids don't need that notion in their heads at that age.

Or gee, I wonder if its that no one feels like humoring a conspiracy idiot in his anal sex fantasies.
 
Or gee, I wonder if its that no one feels like humoring a conspiracy idiot in his anal sex fantasies.

Would you be opposed to elementary age school kids being taught about anal sex? Can you just answer instead of being an obnoxious twat your entire life?
 
Would you be opposed to elementary age school kids being taught about anal sex? Can you just answer instead of being an obnoxious twat your entire life?

I'm sorry what was the question assmunch? I didn't hear you. What was that about the Jews?
 
And Im the only one willing to say it's wrong. Everyone else is afraid to, I assert that's because it IS The agenda, and they don't want to seem "backward", but yet they get to ill to defend it, because they have a shred of decency somewhere within them. DId you understand it this time?
Why should anyone say something is wrong that isn't happening.

Of course teaching anal sex to children is wrong, as is, IMO teaching it to anyone, of either gender.
 
And Im the only one willing to say it's wrong. Everyone else is afraid to, I assert that's because it IS The agenda, and they don't want to seem "backward", but yet they get to ill to defend it, because they have a shred of decency somewhere within them. DId you understand it this time?
I don't understand you bringing it up, because I and I'm sure the rest of the board do not beleive it is part of the agenda. Thus it was not something to be answered.
 
I don't understand you bringing it up, because I and I'm sure the rest of the board do not beleive it is part of the agenda. Thus it was not something to be answered.

Whether it's the agenda or not, a simple hypothetical shouldn't be too hard to deal with. But then again, most tards on here are quite remedial and a hypothetical requires a certain amount of imagination and intelligence. Maybe you're right, it's just out of reach for most.
 
Whether it's the agenda or not, a simple hypothetical shouldn't be too hard to deal with. But then again, most tards on here are quite remedial and a hypothetical requires a certain amount of imagination and intelligence. Maybe you're right, it's just out of reach for most.
Hypothetically speaking, we can talk about why you drilled the hole in your head for the onion. That doesn't mean it is salient to the real world. Nobody supports teaching anal sex to preschoolers. Now some support teaching the dangers of it while in science class, but that is a different ball of wax.
 
Hypothetically speaking, we can talk about why you drilled the hole in your head for the onion. That doesn't mean it is salient to the real world. Nobody supports teaching anal sex to preschoolers. Now some support teaching the dangers of it while in science class, but that is a different ball of wax.

http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=64019


School Board Approves Teaching of Anal Sex


Plans submitted to the Maryland State School Board by the Montgomery County Public School District to teach alternative sexual lifestyles has been approved. The curriculum is intended for 8th and 10th grade students.

The program, which promotes anal sex, homosexuality, bisexuality, and transvestitism as being normal, has come under fire by several pro-family groups who have enlisted the services of the Thomas More Law Center to fight the decision in court.

The pro-family groups feel that among other things, the teaching of anal sex as an alternative puts students at increased risk AIDS/HIV and other diseases. They also state that the curriculum is "full of factual inaccuracies".
 
Oh. I see what you are saying, they are teaching that being gay is normal and you equate that to actually teaching anal sex. That is like saying teaching that Newton created the laws of gravity in a history book is "teaching physics".
 
So, yes. It really is that irrelevant. Exaggeration here is like the exaggeration that "jews" control the world.

It's not irrelevant, it's happening and it's the agenda. Accept it. Don't blame me. What's your feeling on it, now that it's proven to be relevant?
 
Back
Top