Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
Nah - you're exposed. You want to have your cake & eat it too when it comes to religion.
You're just a bigot. That's all.
Nooo... I just want to eat cake and have more! I believe the more cake we have the better!
Nah - you're exposed. You want to have your cake & eat it too when it comes to religion.
You're just a bigot. That's all.
sure he was, Lanza just chose not to follow him.Sorry, God wasn't with Adam Lanza.
sure he was, Lanza just chose not to follow him.
And thank you for admitting that you apparently can't read and comprehend basic English, and instead, have to contort and pervert what people say into something not even relative to what they actually said. This is a testament to your level of ignorance and stupidity.
I learn so much with Dixie on the board. Just yesterday, I learned that $1.2 trillion divided by 10 is $1.2 billion. And today, I find out that the Crusades were poor Christians defending themselves against violent, aggressive Muslims.
LOL, Dixie's dog must have "affirmed" another hoary dodge, the "No True Scotsman" fallacy...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
I learned that the Soviet Union didn't exist during WWII and that no WWII battles were fought in Russia...
I learn so much with Dixie on the board. Just yesterday, I learned that $1.2 trillion divided by 10 is $1.2 billion.
And today, I find out that the Crusades were poor Christians defending themselves against violent, aggressive Muslims.
And I forgot - we also learned that when a few Christians commit violent acts, it's the work of a "few misguided individuals." But when a few Muslims do the same, it impugns the whole religion.
It's fascinating stuff.
And we've also learned that whenever someone doesn't say what you want to infer they did say, all you have to do is make the false claim.
The statement was made that some religious societies are the most violent, and I simply asked for some modern examples of Christian societies that fit this claim. I haven't gotten any so far. I got a few instances of misguided individuals, but that isn't a society, unless you think all of society is responsible for the acts of misguided individuals. I certainly hope you're not that stupid, but my dog wonders.
And I forgot - we also learned that when a few Christians commit violent acts, it's the work of a "few misguided individuals." But when a few Muslims do the same, it impugns the whole religion. It's fascinating stuff.
What have I said that's false?
Did you not say it's just a few misguided individuals when Christians do something (even the genocide of the Native Americans)? And have you not impugned Islam for the acts of terrorists?
I made the counter-argument that "some religious societies are the least violent" and was challenged to provide evidence, and I did...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweden#Religion (Lutherans) There is also Colonial Pennsylvania, which was Dutch Quaker religion. That's just off the top of my head, I am sure I could find other examples.
He'll declare victory soon, won't he?
And were immediately refuted...
No, you can read what I said, it's still posted. That's the beautiful thing about a message board. I don't need to keep repeating what I said, it's there for all to see, whenever they feel inclined to read it. I've made no claims or allegations about Islam or Muslims here, I simply asked for some evidence to support the argument that "some religious societies are the most violent" and so far, I haven't gotten a single example in modern times, of a Christian-based violent society. I made the counter-argument that "some religious societies are the least violent" and was challenged to provide evidence, and I did. So at this point, I have supported all that I said, and you've supported nothing you've said.
Really? So Sweden doesn't exist? Dutch Quakers never settled Pennsylvania? WOW... news to me!