BidenPresident
Verified User
The agnostic/skeptic gives no criterion for why certain questions are undecidable. Thus the skeptic has no standard for truth.
Horse shit.
Beliefs in this area are merely blind guesses. How does one "analyze" one's blind guesses.
If you think there is value in blind guesses that cannot be tested, okay. But if you do...YOU ARE WRONG.
I flip a coin and assert: If it comes up HEADS, I guess at least one god exists...if it comes up TAILS, I guess no gods exist. Analyze that!
Question: Are there any sentient beings living on any planet circling the nearest 20 stars to Sol?
Any answer other than, "I do not know" is nothing more than a blind guess...worth nothing.
This disparagement of the agnostic position on the "do any gods exist" is one of the most ignorant positions anyone ever takes.
Horse shit.
An "open mind" can, and often does, simply assert, "I do not know and do not have enough information to make a meaningful guess."
I don't even know what the hell that means...or what it was supposed to mean. BUT...anything that has not been established as IMPOSSIBLE...IS POSSIBLE.
"We can know only that we know nothing. And that is the highest degree of human wisdom.” -- Lev Tolstoy
So, you don't respect the messages in gospel music? That's your choice...but an odd one if you don't trust organized religion, yet you say that Aretha is your "queen"....Yes
I think he’s wrong
I don’t trust organized religion
I believe I have made that very clear and often on this site
I still love string theory
The brightest and most creative minds in human history - Socrates, Voltaire, Tolstoy - all maintain that admitting ignorance is a sign of profound wisdom.
It's wise to know what you don't know, but it takes will to find the answers.
IMO about 80% of people give up even though they still seek the answer. That's when they turn to something easier like pseudoscience, magic, FaceBook, etc.
The agnostic/skeptic gives no criterion for why certain questions are undecidable. Thus the skeptic has no standard for truth.
I think admitting ignorance, even on an anonymous message board, is unpalatable and humiliating to some. Particularly those lacking confidence and self esteem.
I freely admit I generally avoid topics I do not know jack sh*t about.
You are a learner, and I respect that!
Science is the discipline of describing the physical universe. Art is the discipline of the imagination. If you have neither discipline, you have religion.
Tesla exemplified the phrase "crazed genius".“It might as well be said that God has properties. He has not, but only attributes and these are of our own making"
tesla
It's easy to dismiss the 'existence of god', especially in the sense that he 'looks like Zeus' and 'is a Watchmaker'. But, if you can conceive that people have 'Spirits/Souls', and that after death these 'Souls' move to another 'Dimension/Realm', then you could probably conceive that some 'God Force' exists, even though at our present state of development and knowledge we cannot describe or prove.
You were with me on Kant pleasure because you fact checked me, so what is it that you don't believe? How could Harvard and MIT be desperate for funding? Please explain that to me.You are not a believable source
You caused that
Agreed. All anyone has to do chat with goat about 9/11 and the Oklahoma Federal building bombing to see that he is not a "stable genius".You are not a believable source
You caused that
You were with me on Kant pleasure because you fact checked me, so what is it that you don't believe? How could Harvard and MIT be desperate for funding? Please explain that to me.
Do a search on "black holes may be dark matter" and note the date. I try to keep up with astrophysics, I want to know where the new ideas are coming from. It's usually from independent researchers with little to no funding.
So, you don't respect the messages in gospel music? That's your choice...but an odd one if you don't trust organized religion, yet you say that Aretha is your "queen"....
Her pastor has some very valid points, you know....not sure what you're disagreeing with....
You were with me on Kant pleasure because you fact checked me, so what is it that you don't believe? How could Harvard and MIT be desperate for funding? Please explain that to me.
Do a search on "black holes may be dark matter" and note the date. I try to keep up with astrophysics, I want to know where the new ideas are coming from. It's usually from independent researchers with little to no funding.
Makes a great SF plot device.
Tesla exemplified the phrase "crazed genius".
The fuller quote proving he was an idiot:
I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties. He has not, but only attributes and these are of our own making. Of properties we can only speak when dealing with matter filling the space. To say that in the presence of large bodies space becomes curved is equivalent to stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view.“ — Nikola Tesla New York Herald Tribune (11 September 1932)
https://drnikolatesla.tumblr.com/post/154259627293/einsteins-gravity-and-space-curvature
Einstein's theories have been tested as factual. https://www.space.com/41020-putting-relativity-to-the-test.html
I don't hate anyone...It's obvious you do...Just compare out posts...I don’t believe that his interpretation of god is correct
It’s legal for me to believe differently than him
Unlike you to me that doesn’t mean I hate him you hate whore
I don't hate anyone...It's obvious you do...Just compare out posts...
If you don't believe in God, that's fine....it's just odd you chose a gospel singer who did believe in him (and God) to be your queen...don't you agree? I'm not sure what you could possibly disagree with, though, if you're a woman of faith....he wants only what is best for people....
I'm not sure what "legality" has to do with any of this, however....