Jack Smith wants to publicly testify about the entire investigation. Trump’s and his Republican toady’s worst nightmare. They will never allow that to happen.
Oh, what a deliciously delusional fever dream you've spun there.
Jack Smith is suddenly morphing into some eager whistleblower ready to spill tea on national TV?
As if the man who prosecuted war criminals at The Hague and turned the FBI's classified documents unit into a Trump-takedown machine would just waltz into a congressional circus for your anti-fascist fanfic.
Let's eviscerate this nonsense with the cold, hard blade of reality, because your "nightmare" claim is about as sturdy as a campaign promise: full of hot air and zero substance.
First off, the premise that Smith "wants to publicly testify about the entire investigation" is a half-baked distortion of facts, twisted to fit your partisan wet dream.
Yeah, Smith has indeed requested to testify, but not because he's dying to broadcast "Trump's guilt" like a Netflix docuseries. In letters to House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan and Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley as recent as November 7, 2025, Smith's lawyers explicitly stated he's open to open hearings to "correct the many mischaracterizations" about his probes.
This isn't some proactive bombshell drop; it's a defensive play against Republican inquisitors like Jordan, who summoned him on October 10 for a private grilling on Smith's partisan prosecutions.
Smith's team is begging the DOJ for clearance to even speak freely, citing grand jury secrecy, and sealed reports.
"They will never allow that to happen"? It can't happen. Smith's hands are tied by secrecy rules. He couldn't unpack the investigation without risking contempt or worse.
Your imaginary scenario is a desperate cope from someone watching their Jack Smith hero-worship crumble under the weight of indictments that never stuck.