The insane Left in Canada defends career criminal suing people trying to stop him

Someone robbing a store, then trying to steal a motor vehicle, and fighting those that would stop them seems perfectly reasonable to use whatever means is to hand to do so.
Wait a minute... shoplifting is now robbery?

Maybe you can explain that one to us.
This thug obviously thought that their last 17 times doing crimes would let them get away with crimes the 18th and 19th time. That the employees beat some sense (hopefully) into this thug is the bottom line here.
The bottom line is that they used what will probably be seen by the law and the courts as excessive force.

If he wasn't threatening someone's life, they did not have the legal right to beat his skull in with a hammer.

What cave have you been living in???
 
Wait a minute... shoplifting is now robbery?

Maybe you can explain that one to us.

The bottom line is that they used what will probably be seen by the law and the courts as excessive force.

If he wasn't threatening someone's life, they did not have the legal right to beat his skull in with a hammer.

What cave have you been living in???
He's hiding in a cave from the spooky Leftists.
 
The perp was committing violence against the store and its employees.

Normies have a right to defend themselves and their property. Repeat, career, Criminals in the process of committing a crime, have very limited rights, IMHO.

The theft of both the jacket and the car, could easily cause a person to die. Are they supposed to Walk Home, without a jacket, in the Northeast, in the cold night after their shift ends? They could die of hypothermia!

That is Violence by the thief against the owner!

-
 
Here in New Mexico, we have extreme heat in the day, even in the winter, and because there is very little air (high altitude), and next to no moisture in the air(we get 9-12 inches of rain per year), to hold the heat in, even in the summer, people without thermal protection, left out at late night, by getting lost in the desert or mountains, often die from hypothermia.

It happens 2-3 times a year that someone dies from exposure late at night, by getting lost, and not taking the precaution of having a jacket or space blanket, or something, to hold in body heat.

Stealing a vehicle here at least, and their jacket, is attempted MURDER!

Theft of critical equipment is Violence!

Its like stealing a person's Canteen of Water! It can KILL. This is a clear case of Self-Defense.

Steal my ring, I'll live. Steal my car or jacket, I can easily die!

New Mexico, Texas, Arizona, Parts of California, is NOT the Carolina's or Florida. Life here is harsh.

Stealing a jacket is a killing offense. Stealing a car, or a Canteen is a killing offense!

-
 
Last edited:
I don't know the area in question in Canada, or the time of year this offense took place, but I suspect that Canadians understand theft of a jacket is a threat to the life of the person that protection is stolen from.

Steal my wallet, I can cancel my cards. Steal my jacket, as I'm leaving the work place late at night, and they have my phone, and car keys, and jacket, and car, before I realize it has been stolen, and not just misplaced, everyone else is gone, and it might be 20 Miles from the work site to the next civilization. My lighter was in the pocket of the jacket, as well as my fold knife and phone. My water bottles were in the car, as well as my blanket, spare jacket, gloves and stocking cap.

The thief just killed me!

There are places that are not Urban Miami.

-
 
You have a Winnepeg man who has 17 priors and had shoplifted a grocery store returning half an hour later to try and steal a car with the fob he found in a jacket he stole. The employees--eight of them--decided this wasn't going to happen and gave said thug some well deserved thump therapy including one worker using a hammer on him.

So, the thug, gets some liars... err, lawyers, and sues the grocery store and said employees for things like lost wages (the thug was unemployed so figure that one out). Then sues Uber for loss of income even though his car is sitting on blocks and undrivable and unlicensed, then the employees for trauma and "loss of joy" (I assume that later one means freedom to commit crimes making him happy).



Canada definitely needs some invasion or maybe nuking or seven.
I don't want them to be the 51 state.
 
The employees--eight of them--decided this wasn't going to happen and gave said thug some well deserved thump therapy including one worker using a hammer on him.
You probably should not be their defense attorney. You openly say that they were intentionally assaulting him as part of vigilantism.

The police investigated this, and dismissed it. They found that the amount of force was reasonable to apprehend the criminal. If you have other evidence that they were beating him with a hammer as part of "thump therapy", you should get in touch with the police.

Then sues Uber for loss of income even though his car is sitting on blocks and undrivable and unlicensed, then the employees for trauma and "loss of joy" (I assume that later one means freedom to commit crimes making him happy).
You are having trouble with similes. If two people passed each others like ships in the storm, they were not ships, nor in a storm. They were just like ships in a storm. Similarly, the second article says it is LIKE he sued Uber for loss of income... He did not actually sue Uber.

For him to win the loss of income part of the case, he would have to prove that they unlawfully assaulted him, that it led to injuries that kept him from gaining income, and he would have had future income. That is a tall barrier to climb, and luckily it is not my barrier to climb.

I had a similar case against me. An idiot drove drunk into my parked car. It was parked pointed in the wrong direction, but was parked in a legal parking space. It was not moving. He claimed he brain injury he incurred due to hitting my car caused him to get drunk and attack police... Even before the car accident.
 
This is about vigilantes taking matters into their own hands. Eight people could have held the guy down until the cops arrived, but they just wanted to beat on someone.
He likely fought them and they fought back. Or do you really think the perp just lay there passively doing nothing but waiting for the police to arrive and cuff him up?
 
Back
Top