The Irony Of WantingTo Eliminate 'Voter Fraud' While Fighting Traceable Paper Ballots

[evince]

all the voting machines Cos were run by fucking republicans

 

[Nordberg]

all the voting machines Cos were run by fucking republicans

They claimed the machines could not be checked by the states that bought them because of proprietary information. They are fucking tabulators. There is no great invention there.

 

[Minister of Truth]

that was all from the right


counting chads was easily solved


EMPTY THE CHAD BOXES EVERY HOUR


it was the republicans screaming for electronic voting

I literally only heard leftists, who claimed that electronic voting would have prevented Gore from losing the state.

 

[Irish Exit]

Trump hasn't taught you what bullshit that is? I guess you are not behind the environment or preserving American national recreation land. Don't care about auto MPG and pollution. I suippose They are the same to you. I guess having the courts stacked with far right, pro plutocrat judges, is no difference.

Yeah, it really does matter.

Trump is an accidental environmentalist. His repealing the 50% ethanol requirements of the RFS under Obama was supported by environmentalists because the increased acreage need to grow that corn was destroying wildlife habitat, forests, and wetlands. You would know this if you actually kept up with things. Trump's trade wars will reduce CO2 output every time a ship doesn't cross the ocean laden with steel manufactured in high carbon coal-fired furnaces from China and India. I like results and whether he intended these or not, the results will be good for the environment. I disagree with his decision on coal mine riparian setbacks being removed, but on balance, he is doing okay in this regard. Now if you really want to have this debate seriously, explain to me how a $15 minimum wage would have lifted anybody out of poverty without increasing pollution and consumption in the process. Explain to be how driving up the cost of electricity as Obama did and Hillary wanted to do even further would have helped the poor get ahead a foot step. Explain to me how the US continues to exceed reductions in carbon output not being in the Paris Agreement when countries still in it have not. Explain to me how cutting down US forests, pelletizing the wood, shipping it to Europe on fuel burning ships, to be burned in their furnaces as a "renewable energy" is good for the environment. Explain to me how one industrialized nation that is allegedly converting to "Green energy" isn't, in fact, simply exporting their pollution and environmental degradation abroad. No pie in the sky "promises to" do. Show it to me in results. Where are they?

Trump is an asshole, but the only other choice was an megalomaniac bitch. I didn't vote for either, but I make no apologies for at least recognizing that the one America elected isn't nearly as bad as megalomania's Think Blue minions pretend.

 

[Nordberg]

Trump is an accidental environmentalist. His repealing the 50% ethanol requirements of the RFS under Obama was supported by environmentalists because the increased acreage need to grow that corn was destroying wildlife habitat, forests, and wetlands. You would know this if you actually kept up with things. Trump's trade wars will reduce CO2 output every time a ship doesn't cross the ocean laden with steel manufactured in high carbon coal-fired furnaces from China and India. I like results and whether he intended these or not, the results will be good for the environment. I disagree with his decision on coal mine riparian setbacks being removed, but on balance, he is doing okay in this regard. Now if you really want to have this debate seriously, explain to me how a $15 minimum wage would have lifted anybody out of poverty without increasing pollution and consumption in the process. Explain to be how driving up the cost of electricity as Obama did and Hillary wanted to do even further would have helped the poor get ahead a foot step. Explain to me how the US continues to exceed reductions in carbon output not being in the Paris Agreement when countries still in it have not. Explain to me how cutting down US forests, pelletizing the wood, shipping it to Europe on fuel burning ships, to be burned in their furnaces as a "renewable energy" is good for the environment. Explain to me how one industrialized nation that is allegedly converting to "Green energy" isn't, in fact, simply exporting their pollution and environmental degradation abroad. No pie in the sky "promises to" do. Show it to me in results. Where are they?

Trump is an asshole, but the only other choice was an megalomaniac bitch. I didn't vote for either, but I make no apologies for at least recognizing that the one America elected isn't nearly as bad as megalomania's Think Blue minions pretend.

you can be fooled easily. Tht is the explanation. Here try this pie. https://www.dw.com/en/trumps-lasting-damage-to-the-environment/a-44315788 How anyone can think Trump is better for the environment amazed me, but then people were dumb enough to vote for him.