Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Who's the government?
sorry...needs its own thread
Who's the government?
the government is a bunch of wall street connected con artists that have idiots like YOU brainwashed in to believing that they represent you and your interests.
sorry...needs its own thread
No one's brainwashed, idiot. Our government's simply been bought right out from under us. There's a remedy for that, though. Betcha can't guess what it is (hint: it doesn't involve guns).
the government is NOT we the people. that's the second biggest damned lie you liberals are spouting and it's disgusting.
Well, "should" is relative. The income tax rate varies with who is in power. Did the wealthy pay what they should have under Clinton or are they paying what they should now?
OK. So they're aliens from the Orion cluster but they're here to help.![]()
Wasn't what I asked you.
I don't care. I didn't care when other people waited, and I still won't care when candidates for that office only release a year or two in the future. You can clearly see enough in one or two years worth to play "gotcha" for a lifetime.
I'd rather have information salient to making a good choice on who to hire for the job of President. College records, writings, etc. Things you would ask for when interviewing a new prospect for hire. Nobody has ever asked me for tax forms in such a situation.
Since when did privacy have anything to do with running for President? Hell, Obama's been president for almost a full term, and you idiots are still screaming for a birth certificate from him! Even though he already released it!
Romney wants to be President. He wants to show us he's a good businessman. So why is he hiding all the records, from Bain to the Olympics to his governorship, that prove what an outstanding businessman he is?
You saw this post, why didn't you reply?
What Is Mitt Hiding?
If he's not hiding anything, why not release his tax returns?
Your post was not about Mitt, it specifically directed another poster to release tax documents.
Your question requires the definition of "should". I thought you would have figured that out from my answer but apparently not. Soooo, define "should", as it pertains to who's in charge, what's moral and what's ethical.
OK, I"ll make it so simple that even you can understand it.
If the "audit" shows that each year looked at, shows no illegality, are you then going to shut the fuck up?
Sure, if you shut the fuck up until an "audit" is done.
Do we have a deal?![]()
But i'm not the one that started the exchange, regarding the audit; nor am I one that continously complains about certain indivicuals not paying enough.
I'll take that as a "No". Not surprising.![]()
Neither was I suprised when you tried to "spin" the situation to one you were more comfortable with.