The Lie filled Narrative of Adam Schiff - let's review them

Pathological lying Adam Schiff making the absurd statement that Trump's Ukraine call was tantamount to a 'mafia shakedown'

Who takes this idiot serious anymore other than complete morons?


 
Always entertaining

Obama did provide military assistance, and if you listened today, you would have known that at the time it was standing policy toward the Ukraine that the US didn't provide Javelins because at the time they didn't know what would be Russia's response, in other words, that it would escalate hostilities.
It's also important to remember that Putin owned the Ukrainian govt. after Manafort was paid handsomely to accomplish that. They couldn't be trusted with advanced weaponry.
 
Always entertaining

Obama did provide military assistance, and if you listened today, you would have known that at the time it was standing policy toward the Ukraine that the US didn't provide Javelins because at the time they didn't know what would be Russia's response, in other words, that it would escalate hostilities.

In the end, none of that matters today, Obama didn't manipulate aid to obtain a personal end, he didn't use it to get another nation to start an investigation into a political rival, in fact, no President has, that distinction belongs to Trump

You are getting behind the talking points there "truthie," your side has moved beyond that, they are now in the "it was wrong but not serious enough to impeach a President," try to catch up

And the rest, again, pure "truthie," nothing anyone couldn't hear by just checking Fox or turning on the radio

He provided assistance that was completely useless.
 
It's also important to remember that Putin owned the Ukrainian govt. after Manafort was paid handsomely to accomplish that. They couldn't be trusted with advanced weaponry.

Here is all you need to remember:

What I find most amazing about this narrative, is that under Obama, lethal aid was never given.

During Obama's Presidency, Ukraine was invaded by Russia. A Malaysian airliner was shot down.

During Obama's Presidency, the Crimea was invaded by Russia and overrun.

Did anyone see Schiff or the Democrats clamor for weaponry for Ukraine? Did they want to impeach Biden for withholding non-lethal aid for Ukraine?

Of course not. The reason is simple; Democrats didn't give a shit about Ukraine. They didn't give a shit about Iraq. They didn't give a shit about Afghanistan nor did they give a shit about Syria.
 
It's also important to remember that Putin owned the Ukrainian govt. after Manafort was paid handsomely to accomplish that. They couldn't be trusted with advanced weaponry.

You hate facts don't you, you brain dead leftist lying lunatic. :rolleyes:
 
He provided assistance that was completely useless.

Correct! :thumbsup:

IN addition, he did NOTHING when Russian missiles fired from Ukrainian soil downed a Malaysia airliner. He did NOTHING for Ukraine when Russians were fighting with Ukrainian Marxists. He did NOTHING when Russia invaded and annexed Crimea.

For leftists who supported Obama to now suddenly suggest they care is a lie.
 
Absolutely not true. He gave then 230 armored humvees. counter mortar radar equipment, night vision equipment and medical supplies. That was not useless bt any definition.

LINK Nerberger. :rolleyes:

Sorry, Joe: Team Obama refused to arm Ukraine at all

In 2014, after Russia annexed Crimea and began arming separatists in eastern Ukraine with tanks, armored vehicles and rocket launchers, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko came to Washington to plead for weapons to defend his country. In an impassioned address to a joint session of Congress — with Biden sitting directly behind him — Poroshenko said his country appreciated the nonlethal assistance he was getting, but declared “one cannot win a war with blankets.”

The Obama-Biden administration was unmoved. The Wall Street Journal reported at the time that “President Barack Obama stuck to his refusal to provide weapons or other lethal military gear to Ukraine.” Why?

Team Obama feared that lethal aid would provoke Moscow.

https://nypost.com/2019/10/09/sorry-joe-team-obama-refused-to-arm-ukraine-at-all/

Obama approves $75 million in nonlethal aid to Ukraine
https://www.latimes.com/world/europe/la-fg-us-ukraine-aid-20150311-story.html
 
Here is all you need to remember:

What I find most amazing about this narrative, is that under Obama, lethal aid was never given.

During Obama's Presidency, Ukraine was invaded by Russia. A Malaysian airliner was shot down.

During Obama's Presidency, the Crimea was invaded by Russia and overrun.

Did anyone see Schiff or the Democrats clamor for weaponry for Ukraine? Did they want to impeach Biden for withholding non-lethal aid for Ukraine?

Of course not. The reason is simple; Democrats didn't give a shit about Ukraine. They didn't give a shit about Iraq. They didn't give a shit about Afghanistan nor did they give a shit about Syria.

This stuff cracks anyone up, now everything Trump did is all about Obama; Trump seeks foreign help in his reelection but it is all about Obama; Trump leverages foreign aid to seek "favors" and it is all about Obama; Trump perpetuates debunked conspiracies but it is all about Obama; Trump refuses to cooperate and it is all about Obama; etc, etc, etc

Clue for you "truthie," none of this about Obama, nor Biden for that matter, if all you got is "whataboutisms" you are better off with your corny copy and pastes
 
This stuff cracks anyone up, now everything Trump did is all about Obama;

That isn't the case at all. Why all the lies and fabrications.

Was Ukraine invaded during Obama's Presidency? Yes or No?

Was the Ukrainian Crimea annexed by Russia during Obama's Presidency? Yes or No?

Was Ukrainian aid held up by Obama's Administration? Yes or no?

Did Obama NOT allow lethal aid to be given to Ukraine? Yes or No?

Did Obama say he wanted to reset relations with Russia? Yes or No?

The honest answer to ALL the above is an unequivocal YES.

Trump seeks foreign help in his reelection

That is a demonstrable lie with ZERO credible evidence to support it. Why all the lies?

Trump leverages foreign aid to seek "favors"

That is a demonstrable lie with ZERO credible evidence to support it. Why all the lies?

Trump perpetuates debunked conspiracies

What "debunked" conspiracy? The one about the Russians hacking the DNC when the person who received those e-mails flatly denies getting them from the Russians?

Or is it the one where the FBI was denied access to the "hacked" DNC servers but they were given to Crowdstrike to investigate for reasons no one has been told?

Trump refuses to cooperate and it is all about Obama; etc, etc, etc

That is a demonstrable lie with ZERO credible evidence to support it. Why all the lies?

Clue for you "truthie," none of this about Obama, nor Biden for that matter,

Why? Because you say so? Who was President when the DNC emails were hacked? Who was President when the Russians supposedly interfered with the 2016 election? Who was President when Ukraine was invaded? Who was President when Ukraine annexed the Crimea? Who was President when an opposing campaign was spied on by the then, Obama, Justice Department run by a man who declared he was Obama's BUTT boy?

To attempt to argue that these issues have NOTHING to do with Obama requires the willing suspension of one's brains and common sense.

You're an idiot. You'll always will be an idiot. You don't care about the facts. The facts don't support your rhetoric, your lying, your hyperbole or your innuendo of anyone who disagrees with you.

if all you got is "whataboutisms" you are better off with your corny copy and pastes

If all you have is lying and crying, you are better off with your corny copy and pastes. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top