So, anything I disagree with you about is a sin. Your word is God's word.
As always you show your ignorance
So, anything I disagree with you about is a sin. Your word is God's word.
As always you show your ignorance
As always you cannot debate for shit.
When you show you have no knowledge of the OP there is nothing to debate
I know the Old Testament. What did I say that is wrong? (I know you are too cowardly to debate me.)
You compared mr to God. The OT has lots of wisdom and prophecy in it
No, I said you have no right to speak for God.
I have the right to show what the Bible says which is the word of God. You don't believe the Bible anyway since you are a Democrat
This is not correct. Homosexual sex amongst men is what is spelled out as being an abomination. Simply being a homosexual, i.e. homosexuality, is not denigrated in the Bible at all, nor is lesbian sex, however gfm7175 has asserted that certain passages cover lesbian sex as being wrong, so I'll defer to his interpretation. Otherwise the Bible has no LGBTQIAPPIOSPRPUVWESALM+-specific references. All you will find are the generic, vanilla "men should not fornicate" and "women should not whore."Homosexuality is still sin.
Jesus replaced much of the law. But what was sin in the old Testament still is sin But the Blood of Jesus gives you forgiveness for sin if you repent. Homosexuality is still sin. Saying God made a mistake with your gender is also sin
I'm not a Bible scholar, at all. I have read the Bible. The OT reads like the document that it is - something written by ancient, rather primitive and superstitious people. And clearly, the God of the OT bears little to no resemblance to the God of the NT.
Leviticus comes up a lot because of LGBTQ, but can anyone explain to me why some Christians adhere to both the OT and NT, and some just the NT? And I think I've heard that some of the "old laws" were abolished or something, at some point?
I just don't get it. I believe God is a timeless being - at least 13 billion years old, and likely much older than that. He changed his mind and personality over the course of a few thousand years?
It's still socially convenient to accept the trappings of religion,
but do these very smart people really have religious faith?
I doubt it, but I could of course be wrong.
To me, if you open your eyes in the morning,
you see instantly that you're not in a world
created by a god who's both omnipotent and all-loving.
In the end, it's something that simple that determined my position on the subject.
In the Old Testament Homosexuality was punishable by death. Now through the Blood of Jesus you can be forgiven for that sin if you repent
Are you saying that Jimmy and Roslyn Carter, Joe and Jill Biden are faking their Christian faith?
It seems like you are thinking of Trump.
When I wake up in the. morning I see magic all around me. There is no law of biology or evolution that explains to me why a sunrise palatte or clear star strewn night sky gives me such palpable and intangible aesthetic pleasure.
It's possible nothing is real besides quarks and electrons. But most people are looking for meaning and purpose beyond the quark. That's where religion and spirituality come into play.
I'm not a Bible scholar, at all. I have read the Bible. The OT reads like the document that it is - something written by ancient, rather primitive and superstitious people. And clearly, the God of the OT bears little to no resemblance to the God of the NT.
Leviticus comes up a lot because of LGBTQ, but can anyone explain to me why some Christians adhere to both the OT and NT, and some just the NT? And I think I've heard that some of the "old laws" were abolished or something, at some point?
I just don't get it. I believe God is a timeless being - at least 13 billion years old, and likely much older than that. He changed his mind and personality over the course of a few thousand years?
Heaven isn’t meant for everyone
Why not?
I mean, the story is god makes humans, and makes them sinful. Then torments them forever for being what he made them.
God seems like a total jerk.
When you show you have no knowledge of the OP there is nothing to debate
I'm not a Bible scholar, at all. I have read the Bible. The OT reads like the document that it is - something written by ancient, rather primitive and superstitious people. And clearly, the God of the OT bears little to no resemblance to the God of the NT.
Leviticus comes up a lot because of LGBTQ, but can anyone explain to me why some Christians adhere to both the OT and NT, and some just the NT? And I think I've heard that some of the "old laws" were abolished or something, at some point?
I just don't get it. I believe God is a timeless being - at least 13 billion years old, and likely much older than that. He changed his mind and personality over the course of a few thousand years?