signalmankenneth
Verified User
A Nightmare Future Indeed
The Palin saga continues....
- Thread starter Taichiliberal
- Start date
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
I read what you posted.....I assumed it was what you believed important about the article.....if it wasn't you certainly suck at thread starting......in reading what you posted I certainly didn't see anything to raise alarms....thus, I didn't waste my time reading further.....I guess that simply makes me a willfull Taichliberal ignorer.......
Canceled.LTroll.9
Banned
The newly-released mind-boggling, record-smashing $3,400,000,000,000 federal budget invites plenty of opportunity to debate the merits of incurring more and more debt that will drown the next generation of Americans. Never has it been possible to spend your way out of debt.
So... let the debate begin.
Included in the debate process will be opportunities for our president to deliberate internally the wisdom of this debt explosion, along with other economic, military and social issues facing our country. Our president will discuss these important issues with Democrat leaders and those within his inner circle. I would ask the president to show decency in this process by eliminating one member of that inner circle, Mr. Rahm Emanuel, and not allow Rahm’s continued indecent tactics to cloud efforts.
Yes, Rahm is known for his caustic, crude references about those with whom he disagrees, but his recent tirade against participants in a strategy session was such a strong slap in many American faces that our president is doing himself a disservice by seeming to condone Rahm’s recent sick and offensive tactic.
The Obama Administration’s Chief of Staff scolded participants, calling them, “F---ing retarded,” according to several participants, as reported in the Wall Street Journal.
Just as we’d be appalled if any public figure of Rahm’s stature ever used the “N-word” or other such inappropriate language, Rahm’s slur on all God’s children with cognitive and developmental disabilities – and the people who love them – is unacceptable, and it’s heartbreaking.
A patriot in North Andover, Massachusetts, notified me of Rahm’s “retarded” slam. I join this gentleman, who is the father of a beautiful child born with Down Syndrome, in asking why the Special Olympics, National Down Syndrome Society and other groups condemning Rahm’s degrading scolding have been completely ignored by the White House. No comment from his boss, the president?
As my friend in North Andover says, “This isn’t about politics; it’s about decency. I am not speaking as a political figure but as a parent and as an everyday American wanting my child to grow up in a country free from mindless prejudice and discrimination, free from gratuitous insults of people who are ostensibly smart enough to know better... Have you no sense of decency, sir?”
So... let the debate begin.
Included in the debate process will be opportunities for our president to deliberate internally the wisdom of this debt explosion, along with other economic, military and social issues facing our country. Our president will discuss these important issues with Democrat leaders and those within his inner circle. I would ask the president to show decency in this process by eliminating one member of that inner circle, Mr. Rahm Emanuel, and not allow Rahm’s continued indecent tactics to cloud efforts.
Yes, Rahm is known for his caustic, crude references about those with whom he disagrees, but his recent tirade against participants in a strategy session was such a strong slap in many American faces that our president is doing himself a disservice by seeming to condone Rahm’s recent sick and offensive tactic.
The Obama Administration’s Chief of Staff scolded participants, calling them, “F---ing retarded,” according to several participants, as reported in the Wall Street Journal.
Just as we’d be appalled if any public figure of Rahm’s stature ever used the “N-word” or other such inappropriate language, Rahm’s slur on all God’s children with cognitive and developmental disabilities – and the people who love them – is unacceptable, and it’s heartbreaking.
A patriot in North Andover, Massachusetts, notified me of Rahm’s “retarded” slam. I join this gentleman, who is the father of a beautiful child born with Down Syndrome, in asking why the Special Olympics, National Down Syndrome Society and other groups condemning Rahm’s degrading scolding have been completely ignored by the White House. No comment from his boss, the president?
As my friend in North Andover says, “This isn’t about politics; it’s about decency. I am not speaking as a political figure but as a parent and as an everyday American wanting my child to grow up in a country free from mindless prejudice and discrimination, free from gratuitous insults of people who are ostensibly smart enough to know better... Have you no sense of decency, sir?”
Annie
Not So Junior Member
I don't get the left's obsession of her or conservative picks for office. Wouldn't your time be better spent on contacting your own choices?
I can't see myself voting for Palin. Many seem to like her, but the only ones I've heard wanting her to run are on the left and far right. She articulates what many think, but there's something about her shrillness and Obama like self-confidence that turns me off.
I can't see myself voting for Palin. Many seem to like her, but the only ones I've heard wanting her to run are on the left and far right. She articulates what many think, but there's something about her shrillness and Obama like self-confidence that turns me off.
Canceled.LTroll.9
Banned
I’m not a member of the permanent political establishment. And I’ve learned quickly, these past few days, that if you’re not a member in good standing of the Washington elite, then some in the media consider a candidate unqualified for that reason alone.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
A simple yes or no would suffice. Wasn't a lawsuit filed on this then thrown out? Obviously the answer is yes, which means that it is ignorant to continue to discuss it.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
You're not fooling anyone, you know. All you had to say was "No, I didn't read the article in the link provided". Then you could have read it, and we could have had a rational discussion.
Instead, you trot out this lame ass excuse for being a willfully ignorant neocon.....too cowardly to admit error and have an honest discussion I mean, anyone with an 8th of a brain realizes that if an address link is provided to a EXCERPT, that means there's more to follow. It's been done by EVERYONE ON EITHER SIDE OF THE POLITICAL FENCE ON THESE BOARDS SINCE I CAME HERE LAST YEAR. Remember toodles, we CANNOT reprint an entire article....that's in the rules.
So stop wasting time...either read the article or STFUP or just be honest and admit you didn't READ the entire article.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
A simple yes or no would suffice. Wasn't a lawsuit filed on this then thrown out? Obviously the answer is yes, which means that it is ignorant to continue to discuss it.
If you had read the article, you'd have your answer. But like the cowardly neocon parrot that you are, you'll avoid any honest discussion that might actually require you to THINK beyond the neocon mantras and rhetoric.
i'M NOT GOING TO DISCUSS A TOPIC WITH SOMEONE WHO REFUSES TO SIMPLY READ SUPPLIED INFORMATION ON THAT TOPIC. QUIT STALLING AND GET YOUR ASS IN GEAR, BUNKY!
SmarterthanYou
rebel
Yes, you are.
you're another wannabe elitist, just like every other career politician.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Palin puts herself out there in the limelight, and FOX NOISE promotes the hell out her with the astro-turf teabagger bullshit. But, if someone points out the lies, half-truths, faults and just plain BS that flows out of Palin's mouth, they're "obsessed".
Sorry Annie, but that dog of yours just won't fly. And since when is "confidence" a bad thing? I'm SO tired of this subliminal BS about Obama.....he's a confident man so he's "arrogant"? Since when do the American people want an unconfident man as a leader?
Bottom line: the article about Palin's husband is of note in lieu of her resignation and current political aspirations.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Since Obama honestly includes the cost of the Iraq invasion/occupation into the deficit and budget concerns, (which the Shrub & company DID NOT do) America is NOW getting a wake up call....but some want to deny the results of 2000-2008 under the Shrub & company.
Now, that been said....WTF does the rest of your little diatribe have to do with the article I posted?
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
And did you actually READ the ENTIRE article?
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
And another little tidbit......seems the neocon darling can't even throw fish to the teabagging barking seals without a little help.
http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/archives/193773.asp
Unreal! The neocons all squawked in unison that Obama couldn't function without a teleprompter....until he handed the GOP their own skewered asses on television during a Q & A at the GOP summit recently.
Now I can't wait for more excuses from our resident neocon parrots as to paying a 100 grand for some clown who can't properly prepare for a speech.
http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/archives/193773.asp
Unreal! The neocons all squawked in unison that Obama couldn't function without a teleprompter....until he handed the GOP their own skewered asses on television during a Q & A at the GOP summit recently.
Now I can't wait for more excuses from our resident neocon parrots as to paying a 100 grand for some clown who can't properly prepare for a speech.
Aren't most of us....
Just old moldy rehashed unproven innuendo and crap accusations from years ago....don't waste your time as I wasted mine....
Thats even funnier....the scrawled words "Energy," "budget," tax" on the pal of her hand (rather than on a 3 x 5 card) being compared to a teleprompter.....how fuckin' desparate must you be to even bring that up....have an apple with that whine?
:lmao:
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
apparently it was a wasted effort to televise it, since you couldn't have watched it and come to that conclusion......did Huffington put it in a link that you scrutinized thoughtfully?......
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
My, my, having a little hissy fit today, are we?
Why don't you simply answer my question instead of requiring me to read some lengthy article that you posted?
Huffington cut it up and showed a few clips that they thought he "won"...
I posted the entire Q&A, yesterday. Spend some time watching it, the President handed them there ass.
Why do you think they are refusing to do it again?