The phony hand wringing over the FBI investigation

You are a master at changing the subject. Which is why you are such a waste of time. You never address anything, your response to everything is the right wing talking point. Almost word for word. You have no independent thought. You are fine with foreign interference in our elections. It’s stunning. I guess people who lack ethics thinks it’s okay for others to be unethical. That’s a hill I have always died on. It’s a hill you don’t care about in the least. That’s why you’re a Trump supporter. Lack of integrity.

^punt lol
 
The ‘pee tape’ was never used in the campaign. So as usual, your argument is full of holes.
 
Trump has attempted to dismantle NATO, he turned on the Kurds, he’s completely ignored the fact that Russia put a bounty on our troops. Now Trump is moving our troops out of Germany. And trump has stated publicly that he believes Russia over our intelligence community. It makes PERFECT sense. Trump is a Russian asset. Right out in the open. And you are fine with it.

You bought the Russian bounty bit. Blow me over with a feather.

If you want to hurt Russia—hurt them where it hurts the most. On energy policy.

Sounds like Russia could use a new ‘asset’ in the WH.

And I have a suggestion.
 
She’d get away with it, obviously lol.

Derp.
I should rephrase...what would you think if Hillary did that? Or hired the AG to be her personal attorney? Or put a mega donor in charge of destroying the USPS in order to help her get re elected?
 
You bought the Russian bounty bit. Blow me over with a feather.

If you want to hurt Russia—hurt them where it hurts the most. On energy policy.

Sounds like Russia could use a new ‘asset’ in the WH.

And I have a suggestion.

I believe in facts, you believe in conspiracy theories. Again, rather than debating the merits of the information you dismiss anything you don’t like and embrace anything you do. You can’t justify it or explain it. You are a parrot.
 
One conspiracy theory at a time please.

How is it a conspiracy theory. Trump did, in fact, put one of his donors and a former member of the RNC finance committee in charge of a huge organization he knew nothing about. In fact, on a Friday night, he fired a bunch of senior management and replaced them with Trump people. Whatever conclusion you may draw from these facts, they ARE facts. Trump said it out loud. If there is no deal, they won’t be able to get their mail in voting. That isn’t a conspiracy theory. It is a fact pattern.
 
I believe in facts, you believe in conspiracy theories. Again, rather than debating the merits of the information you dismiss anything you don’t like and embrace anything you do. You can’t justify it or explain it. You are a parrot.

If you don’t know of a better way to hurt Russia than with energy policy just say so.

Live to fight another day.
 
If you don’t know of a better way to hurt Russia than with energy policy just say so.

Live to fight another day.

In other words, you can’t explain any of the rest of it, so you find one thing that might not benefit Russia. Everything else the guy does DOES benefit Russia, at the expense of our long time allies. And again, you are fine with that and think it’s routine. It isn’t.

If Russia thinks Trump is bad for them, why are they working to get him reelected again? Or are you going to claim that’s fake news too.
 
Yes, as one example. It doesn’t matter whether they got anything or not. What they were offering was illegal help. Don Junior was just too stupid to know any better. An attempt by a foreign government to influence our election is completely unacceptable. It compromises the candidate. And that’s exactly what happened. Trump is compromised. Right in plain site. And you are fine with it.

Republicans typically are fine with it. They know it's out of bounds, that coming from a normal candidate it would be unacceptable, as so much else in Trump's resume of political and personal behavior would be unacceptable. Imagine the absurdity of successfully attacking Trump for being careless with some classified emails. But Trump is shielded from effective criticism in a category of conduct of his own, where rules are set by him. He shouldn't be shielded in this way. But it's obvious he is. The question is whether Biden can do what Hillary couldn't and pull enough voters away from the strange appeal he wields on weaker minded voters that maintains that shield.
 
Republicans typically are fine with it. They know it's out of bounds, that coming from a normal candidate it would be unacceptable, as so much else in Trump's resume of political and personal behavior would be unacceptable. Imagine the absurdity of successfully attacking Trump for being careless with some classified emails. But Trump is shielded from effective criticism in a category of conduct of his own, where rules are set by him. He shouldn't be shielded in this way. But it's obvious he is. The question is whether Biden can do what Hillary couldn't and pull enough voters away from the strange appeal he wields on weaker minded voters that maintains that shield.

Trump stoked fear, and fear in the weak minded means ethics go out the window. The problem Trump has now is that he can’t protect his minions from the latest boogeyman, because it isn’t liberal, or brown, or scared of Trump. He tires the lame ‘China virus’ tactic in attempt to make the virus yet another ‘liberal’ enemy but it isn’t sticking. Anyone that thinks the virus and our response isn’t the single biggest issue in this campaign they have not been paying attention.
 
Never came to light during the campaign. Nice try though.

Not in name but in substance. On October 31st 2016. Days before the election:

He sent Comey a fiery letter saying the FBI chief may have broken the law and pointed to a potentially greater controversy: “In my communications with you and other top officials in the national security community, it has become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the Russian government…The public has a right to know this information.”

https://www.motherjones.com/politic...ing-russian-operation-cultivate-donald-trump/
__________

So, we have this garbage dossier floating around in late 2016 that the press knows about; Harry Reid knew about it and probably John McCain. All great friends of Donald Trump.

Instead of actually reporting on the dossier [because that could get into who funded it] Mother Jones reports on its substance. Sometime later Buzz Feed would pull the trigger and go Full Monty by publishing the dossier—but that was after the election. Since the cat was out of the bag, WashPo and the rest ran full blast with what we now know, today, was sheer tabloid.

Keep in mind, you are defending this shit.

After that, it was wall to wall Russia-Russia-Russia. The dossier primed the political pump so that by Spring of 2017 Trump had an albatross hung around his neck called the Mullet Investigation. Mullet comes up empty. Weeks later, literally weeks after he wraps up, a mysterious leaker steps up [his personal lawyer is quoted in my sig] and we’re off to the Ukraine races.

That too, was a fail. Clinesmith is part of The Resistance—they caught it in one of his texts.

They will never stop as long as Trump is in office. Instead of worrying about Russians maybe you should worry more about our own domestic subversives.
 
The ‘pee tape’ was never used in the campaign. So as usual, your argument is full of holes.
it didn't have to be campaign covered. the press is Dems's personal campaign platform -they gladly ginned it up.

This thread looks like a pack of lies..maybe i'll debunk some of the trash later on
 
Not in name but in substance. On October 31st 2016. Days before the election:

He sent Comey a fiery letter saying the FBI chief may have broken the law and pointed to a potentially greater controversy: “In my communications with you and other top officials in the national security community, it has become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the Russian government…The public has a right to know this information.”

https://www.motherjones.com/politic...ing-russian-operation-cultivate-donald-trump/
__________

So, we have this garbage dossier floating around in late 2016 that the press knows about; Harry Reid knew about it and probably John McCain. All great friends of Donald Trump.

Instead of actually reporting on the dossier [because that could get into who funded it] Mother Jones reports on its substance. Sometime later Buzz Feed would pull the trigger and go Full Monty by publishing the dossier—but that was after the election. Since the cat was out of the bag, WashPo and the rest ran full blast with what we now know, today, was sheer tabloid.

Keep in mind, you are defending this shit.

After that, it was wall to wall Russia-Russia-Russia. The dossier primed the political pump so that by Spring of 2017 Trump had an albatross hung around his neck called the Mullet Investigation. Mullet comes up empty. Weeks later, literally weeks after he wraps up, a mysterious leaker steps up [his personal lawyer is quoted in my sig] and we’re off to the Ukraine races.

That too, was a fail. Clinesmith is part of The Resistance—they caught it in one of his texts.


They will never stop as long as Trump is in office. Instead of worrying about Russians maybe you should worry more about our own domestic subversives.

Clinesmith was a willing dupe. WAPO and others like Michael Isikoff -all did the gossip

By the time Mueller was appointed all of DoJ (and more outside DoJ) knew there was no evidence of collusion -
Comey and Rosenweasel included
 
it didn't have to be campaign covered. the press is Dems's personal campaign platform -they gladly ginned it up.

This thread looks like a pack of lies..maybe i'll debunk some of the trash later on

We both know if Trump admitted there was "collusion", and said, "it was cool", the nodding of heads around Trumpworld would cast a breeze. So cut the crap.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top