StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Yes, and they were all socialist, fascist, Marxist, leftist. What part confuses you?
As we already established, I don't believe those countries were Socialist.
So your job was to name a fascist regime that is NOT socialist, however none exist because all fascist countries are socialist and all socialist countries become fascist (they don't necessarily start out that way but they become fascist very quickly).
Here are the Fascist countries I listed that didn't call themselves Socialist: Francoist Spain, Austria under the Fatherland Front, Fascist Italy, the Empire of Japan, and the modern incarnations of Russia, Belarus, Cambodia, Hungary, Saudi Arabia, and Iran.
You didn't reply to this because you have no answer, which I expected.
OK, so quickly ... problems with the video:
1) Neither of the writers mentioned at the beginning of the video drafted a revolutionary Constitution to serve as the foundation for the greatest country in human history. They had opinions about nobility that the Founding Fathers specifically outlawed because the Founding Fathers were geniuses.
2) It's a waste of time to dwell on "when" a product is bestown value. All economics runs off the supply-demand curve.
3) Price does not equal Value. Price realization occurs when Price falls somewhere below the consumer-assigned Value while still remaining above the producer's costs. Incidentally, if Price were to always be the Value then there could never be a bargain.
4) Video is clearly trying to assign credit for Value, i.e. laborer or consumer. Stupid waste of time.
5) To believe the author of the video one must accept that the people mentioned somehow owned, and contiune to own, conservatism.
6) At the 5:56 mark, I am finished watching this video. It's crap. It's insulting actually, and it is by no means accurate. "Humans are innately unequal and society flourishes when power is doled out to the deserving." That is the doctrine of the DNC. I know of no conservative who has ever held that view.
So points 1 - 4 of that really have nothing to do with the point of the video, which was to outline the history and Fascist origins of Conservatism.
We can debate whether or not price equals value, but it's beside the point. The reason I linked this video is to show you why Fascism is a right-wing thing.
5) If you watched the entire video, you'd see how today's big Conservative thinkers are just regurgitating the Fathers of Conservatism. Jordan Peterson's whole "Top Lobster" thing is just right-wing hierarchy repackaged. The same goes for Ayn Rand's "Objectivity," which is still used by today's Right. Every influential conservative figure essentially makes the same argument about hierarchy in a different way, meaning there is an unbroken philosophical chain going all the way back to the original Right that opposed Democracy.
6) The DNC is definitely not left-wing, but they are more left-wing than the RNC. And if you look at the typical democratic policies, such as affordable healthcare and raising the minimum wage, they're all about making society more equal. Whereas republican policies are about helping the rich get richer while the poor are forced to sink or swim.
The correct answer is that modern conservatism is championed by Rush Limbaugh. On what point specifically do you and he disagree?
You're making my point for me, my dude. Limbaugh is a typical Righty. Capitalist economics, "small government" for the poor, bailouts for the rich, and disdain for Democracy. And as far as social policies go, he's against rights for women and LGBT people. Which makes sense, because the Right doesn't like oppressed groups moving up the hierarchy.
I'm a Social Democrat and I believe women and LGBT people should have equal rights. So I disagree with Limbaugh on quite a few things.
I agree with him on needing a border wall. So I guess we have that in common. But other than that, I disagree with him on pretty much everything.