The real reason democrats wear masks

AProudLefty said:
One of the worst baits. -5/10
Click to expand...

This bait has passed stinky, and is officially rancid. Some posts are so fucking stupid they deserve to be scorned and ridiculed rather than just ignored. This is one of them. Bobby might be the dumbest poster here. Even his trolling is subpar.
 
Bulletbob said:
first its a natural for then to wear masks to hide their faces to help cover up their actions, but it really gain popularity in the 1800s when they developed the KKK and were killing blacks by hanging them from trees , shooting them and raping their women.
After that you just had so many democrats wearing masks it was silly.

You had the democrat radicals like the weathermen and the black panthers who like to set bombs commit armed robbery's etc that even popularized it even more with the democrat criminal elements.

And the riots over the years really made masks popular with democrats so they could avoid prosecution for attacking
and the ever popular democrat raping women also increased its use along with armed robbery. cops looting arson and other crimes they like to commit.
Even gang banging democrats love them .
Click to expand...
A virus so deadly the population has to wear masks, and when done with one, said masks are thrown to the ground.
 
Bulletbob said:
lets face it more democrats are criminals , and thugs and radicals mask wearing is normal for them
Click to expand...
The arrest comes two days before the all-male Proud Boys group is expected to take part in a “Wild Protest” in Washington over Donald Trump’s loss in the presidential election. Tarrio, using a military phrase, vowed last week in a message on the right-wing Parler social media platform that there would be 1,000 Proud Boys “boots on the ground” at the protest. He also warned that the members of the group would not be wearing their signature black and yellow uniforms but would go “incognito” to avoid detection.

Proud Boys Boss Enrique Tarrio Accused Of Torching Black Church's BLM Banner
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/enri...atter-flag-burning_n_5ff3a4b1c5b61817a538ec6e

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
 
Barfly said:
"The Great Mask Debate" of 2020 will be ridiculed by history. People are just gonna shake their heads at the stupidity. It's a respiratory virus.
Click to expand...

You may be right, but probably not for the reasons you think.

1. Studies on the effectiveness of face masks

So far, most studies found little to no evidence for the effectiveness of face masks in the general population, neither as personal protective equipment nor as a source control.

  • A May 2020 meta-study on pandemic influenza published by the US CDC found that face masks had no effect, neither as personal protective equipment nor as a source control.

  • A July 2020 review by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medince found that there is no evidence for the effectiveness of cloth masks against virus infection or transmission.

  • A Covid-19 cross-country study by the University of East Anglia came to the conclusion that a mask requirement was of no benefit and could even increase the risk of infection.

  • An April 2020 review by two US professors in respiratory and infectious disease from the University of Illinois concluded that face masks have no effect in everyday life, neither as self-protection nor to protect third parties (so-called source control).

  • An article in the New England Journal of Medicine from May 2020 came to the conclusion that cloth face masks offer little to no protection in everyday life.

  • A July 2020 study by Japanese researchers found that cloth masks “offer zero protection against coronavirus” due to their large pore size and generally poor fit.

  • A 2015 study in the British Medical Journal BMJ Open found that cloth masks were penetrated by 97% of particles and may increase infection risk by retaining moisture or repeated use.

Additional aspects:

Japan, despite its widespread use of face masks, experienced its most recent influenza epidemic with more than 5 million people falling ill just one year ago, in January and February 2019. However, unlike SARS-2, the influenza virus is transmitted by children, too.

Several countries and states that introduced mandatory face masks on public transport and in shops in early summer, such as California and Argentina, nevertheless saw a strong increase in infections from July onwards, indicating a low effectiveness of mask policies.

There is increasing evidence that SARS-2 is transmitted, at least indoors, not only by droplets but also by smaller aerosols. However, due to their large pore size, cloth masks cannot filter out aerosols.

The WHO admitted to the BBC that its June 2020 mask policy update was due not to new evidence but “political lobbying”:

“We had been told by various sources WHO committee reviewing the evidence had not backed masks but they recommended them due to political lobbying. This point was put to WHO who did not deny.” (Deborah Cohen, BBC Medical Correspondent).

2. Studies claiming face masks are effective

Some recent studies argued that cloth face masks are indeed effective against the new coronavirus and could at least prevent the infection of other people. However, most of these studies suffer from poor methodology and sometimes show the opposite of what they claim.

Typically, these studies ignore the effect of other measures, the natural development of infection numbers, changes in test activity, or they compare countries with very different conditions.

An overview:

A German study claimed that the introduction of compulsory masks in German cities had led to a decrease in infections. But the data does not support this: in some cities there was no change, in others a decrease, in others an increase in infections (see graph below). The city of Jena was an ‘exception’ only because it simultaneously introduced the strictest quarantine rules in Germany, but the study did not mention this.

germany-face-masks-april-2020.png


Mandatory masks in German cities: no relevant impact.

A study in the journal PNAS claimed that masks had led to a decrease in infections in three hotspots (including New York City). This did not take into account the natural decrease in infections and other measures. The study was so flawed that over 40 scientists recommended that the study be withdrawn.

A US study claimed that mandatory masks had led to a decrease in infections in 15 states. The study did not take into account that the incidence of infection was already declining in most states at that time. A comparison with other states was not made.

A Canadian study claimed that countries with mandatory masks had fewer deaths than countries without mandatory masks. But the study compared African, Latin American, Asian and Eastern European countries with very different infection rates and population structures.

A much-cited meta-study in the journal The Lancet claimed that masks “could” lead to a reduction in the risk of infection, but the studies considered mainly hospitals (Sars-1), medical (not cloth) masks, and the strength of the evidence was reported as “low”.

3. Risks associated with face masks

Wearing masks for a prolonged period of time is not harmless, as the following evidence shows:

  • The WHO warns of various “side effects” such as difficulty breathing and skin rashes.
  • Tests conducted by the University Hospital of Leipzig in Germany have shown that face masks significantly reduce the resilience and performance of healthy persons.
  • A German psychological study with about 1000 participants found “severe psychosocial consequences” due to the introduction of mandatory face masks in Germany.
  • The Hamburg Environmental Institute warned against the inhalation of chlorine compounds in polyester masks as well as problems in connection with disposal.
  • The European rapid alert system RAPEX has already recalled 70 mask models because they did not meet EU quality standards and could lead to “serious risks”.
  • In China, two boys who had to wear a mask during sports classes fainted and died.
  • In the US, a driver wearing an N95 (FFP2) mask fainted and crashed into a pole.


Conclusion

Face masks in the general population might be effective, at least in some circumstances, but there is currently little to no evidence supporting this proposition. If the SARS-2 virus is indeed transmitted via aerosols, at least indoors, masks are unlikely to be protective.





https://www.globalresearch.ca/are-face-masks-effective-evidence/5720209[/I
 
Oh look! The "doctor" thinks he contributes anything on JPP that has maybe 30 regulars who don't pay him much attention. His money and time would be better spent on a larger venue.

Or maybe he just has no life with no friends and is very bored.
 
AProudLefty said:
Oh look! The "doctor" thinks he contributes anything on JPP that has maybe 30 regulars who don't pay him much attention. His money and time would be better spent on a larger venue.

Or maybe he just has no life with no friends and is very bored.
Click to expand...

hes getting a bigger crowd then big daddy biter did lol
 
Bulletbob said:
first its a natural for then to wear masks to hide their faces to help cover up their actions, but it really gain popularity in the 1800s when they developed the KKK and were killing blacks by hanging them from trees , shooting them and raping their women.
After that you just had so many democrats wearing masks it was silly.

You had the democrat radicals like the weathermen and the black panthers who like to set bombs commit armed robbery's etc that even popularized it even more with the democrat criminal elements.

And the riots over the years really made masks popular with democrats so they could avoid prosecution for attacking
and the ever popular democrat raping women also increased its use along with armed robbery. cops looting arson and other crimes they like to commit.
Even gang banging democrats love them .
Click to expand...

It is to keep out the stink of you pox-ridden nazi buggers, obviously.
 
Bulletbob said:
first its a natural for then to wear masks to hide their faces to help cover up their actions, but it really gain popularity in the 1800s when they developed the KKK and were killing blacks by hanging them from trees , shooting them and raping their women.
After that you just had so many democrats wearing masks it was silly.

You had the democrat radicals like the weathermen and the black panthers who like to set bombs commit armed robbery's etc that even popularized it even more with the democrat criminal elements.

And the riots over the years really made masks popular with democrats so they could avoid prosecution for attacking
and the ever popular democrat raping women also increased its use along with armed robbery. cops looting arson and other crimes they like to commit.
Even gang banging democrats love them .
Click to expand...

Every lefty on this site has conceded that masks are a bullshit hoax, they did it on the thread below:

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...would-you-wear-to-protect-from-a-deadly-virus

Lefties know masks don't work.
 
democrats have been wearing masks from the early days of man when burning books and people got started. they next did a lot of it after the cival war as kkk hanging blacks and wearing masks carrying fire bombs much like they did in the riots of 2020 .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top