Bfgrn
New member
None of the above are authorized by the Constitution and would require constitutional amendments to implement but socialist neo-communist Democrats couldn’t give a rat’s ass about the Constitution or constitutionalism.
Thanks for proving again you no liberal. You are a far right wing Ayn Rand social Darwinist. Even Friedrich Hayek, the patron saint of 'classical liberals' and libertarians not only accepted a limited welfare state, but specifically singles out health care as an area where the state should provide a safety net:
"There is no reason why, in a society which has reached the general level of wealth ours has, the first kind of security should not be guaranteed to all without endangering general freedom; that is: some minimum of food, shelter and clothing, sufficient to preserve health. Nor is there any reason why the state should not help to organize a comprehensive system of social insurance in providing for those common hazards of life against which few can make adequate provision."
"The preservation of competition," he wrote in the Road to Serfdom, is not "incompatible with an extensive system of social services — so long as the organization of these services is not designed in such a way as to make competition ineffective over wide fields."
You are a fraud, an enemy to the Constitution and a danger to a free and open society. The biggest social Darwinists of the 20th century were Marx, Engel, Stalin, and Hitler.
The only enemies of the Constitution are those who try to wield it as a weapon against the living, by using the words of the dead.