The Repeal of Glass Steagal Did Not Cause the Financial Crisis

Bonestorm

Thrillhouse
And reinstating it wouldn't have prevented JP Morgan from losing $2 billion (plus) on a bet:

Let’s look at the facts of the financial crisis in the context of Glass-Steagall.

The first domino to nearly topple over in the financial crisis was Bear Stearns, an investment bank that had nothing to do with commercial banking. Glass-Steagall would have been irrelevant. Then came Lehman Brothers; it too was an investment bank with no commercial banking business and therefore wouldn’t have been covered by Glass-Steagall either. After them, Merrill Lynch was next — and yep, it too was an investment bank that had nothing to do with Glass-Steagall.

Next in line was the American International Group, an insurance company that was also unrelated to Glass-Steagall. While we’re at it, we should probably throw in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which similarly, had nothing to do with Glass-Steagall.

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/05...d-rule-is-not-a-cure-for-crisis/?ref=business
 
That is a very interesting tidbit about Bear Sterns.

Gear up - there are some "morons" and "do tell us's" coming your way...
 
I guess you'd have to investigate to what extent the banks were investing in MBSs. G/S made it illegal for savings banks to dabble in the market. When banks are heavily invested in the securities market, they're more apt to make risky loans to bolster said market.

I do agree that the collapse was due to a number of factors, all originating from schemes on Wall St. Many agencies were complicit, including realtors/appraisers/private lending institutions, and of course, the hucksters mentioned in the OP
 
one would think that this should be a clear sign telling us that the government doesn't know what the fuck it's doing trying to regulate the economy, but nobody here is going to listen to that.
 
The repeal of glass steagall most certainly did cause the collapse. Previously, bank were forced to separate commercial banking from investment banking. In this case they created bad mortgages in the commercial division, and then repackaged them as investment products for the investment side, and resold/relevereged them many times, knowing they were bad.
 
The repeal of glass steagall most certainly did cause the collapse. Previously, bank were forced to separate commercial banking from investment banking. In this case they created bad mortgages in the commercial division, and then repackaged them as investment products for the investment side, and resold/relevereged them many times, knowing they were bad.

Re-packaged along with good mortgages, all mixed up with the crap mortgages, making the whole package a bundle of shit - and it was then given a triple 'A' rating...
 
one would think that this should be a clear sign telling us that the government doesn't know what the fuck it's doing trying to regulate the economy, but nobody here is going to listen to that.
That might be valid, had Wall St not pushed products that they knew were garbage, on investors. Ratings agencies were complicit as well.

This scam alone ABACUS cost investors $1 billion. In the end, Goldman Sachs paid a $550 million fine.

That's great business sense.
 
I guess you'd have to investigate to what extent the banks were investing in MBSs. G/S made it illegal for savings banks to dabble in the market. When banks are heavily invested in the securities market, they're more apt to make risky loans to bolster said market.

I do agree that the collapse was due to a number of factors, all originating from schemes on Wall St. Many agencies were complicit, including realtors/appraisers/private lending institutions, and of course, the hucksters mentioned in the OP

we not only need to reinstate g/s but regulate investment banks, especially those that are too big to fail
 
That is a very interesting tidbit about Bear Sterns.

Gear up - there are some "morons" and "do tell us's" coming your way...

LMAO

I was just about to post, uh oh, this is to SF like bleeding guts to a shark.

Political chum.

How has SF managed to avoid this one?

He PM'd me that he has an outbreak of boils, or some sort of angry rash? I wasn't clear on the details. He probably has been busy putting lotion on himself.

LMAO

Eww!



When you pinheads get done jerking each other off, are you going to post anything about the topic ?
 
Back
Top