And reinstating it wouldn't have prevented JP Morgan from losing $2 billion (plus) on a bet:
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/05...d-rule-is-not-a-cure-for-crisis/?ref=business
Let’s look at the facts of the financial crisis in the context of Glass-Steagall.
The first domino to nearly topple over in the financial crisis was Bear Stearns, an investment bank that had nothing to do with commercial banking. Glass-Steagall would have been irrelevant. Then came Lehman Brothers; it too was an investment bank with no commercial banking business and therefore wouldn’t have been covered by Glass-Steagall either. After them, Merrill Lynch was next — and yep, it too was an investment bank that had nothing to do with Glass-Steagall.
Next in line was the American International Group, an insurance company that was also unrelated to Glass-Steagall. While we’re at it, we should probably throw in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which similarly, had nothing to do with Glass-Steagall.
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/05...d-rule-is-not-a-cure-for-crisis/?ref=business