The Repeal of Glass Steagal Did Not Cause the Financial Crisis

Don't forget the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, it was that act that enabled entities like Citicorp to become legal. Previously it would not have been allowed under Glass-Steagall.

The Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLB), also known as the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, (Pub.L. 106-102, 113 Stat. 1338, enacted November 12, 1999) or the Citigroup Relief Act[SUP][1][/SUP] is an act of the 106th United States Congress (1999–2001). It repealed part of the Glass–Steagall Act of 1933, removing barriers in the market among banking companies, securities companies and insurance companies that prohibited any one institution from acting as any combination of an investment bank, a commercial bank, and an insurance company. With the passage of the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act, commercial banks, investment banks, securities firms, and insurance companies were allowed to consolidate. The legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton. A year before the law was passed, Citicorp, a commercial bank holding company, merged with the insurance company Travelers Group in 1998 to form the conglomerate Citigroup, a corporation combining banking, securities and insurance services under a house of brands that included Citibank, Smith Barney, Primerica, and Travelers. Because this merger was a violation of the Glass–Steagall Act and the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, the Federal Reserve gave Citigroup a temporary waiver in September 1998.[SUP][2][/SUP] Less than a year later, GLB was passed to legalize these types of mergers on a permanent basis. The law also repealed Glass–Steagall's conflict of interest prohibitions "against simultaneous service by any officer, director, or employee of a securities firm as an officer, director, or employee of any member bank."[SUP][3]

[/SUP]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm–Leach–Bliley_Act
 
I don't disagree, but let's not pretend that it will solve more problems than it will solve or that the repeal of Glass Steagal was the act that brought about the financial crisis.

Does anybody claim it is the only thing that "caused" it, or do they say it was a major contributor to it?
 
Don't forget the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, it was that act that enabled entities like Citicorp to become legal. Previously it would not have been allowed under Glass-Steagall.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm–Leach–Bliley_Act

This explains just how toxic is Gramm's legacy.

Shortly after George W. Bush was elected president, Congress and President Clinton were trying to pass a $384 billion omnibus spending bill, and while the debates swirled around the passage of this bill, Senator Phil Gramm clandestinely slipped a 262-page amendment into the omnibus appropriations bill titled: Commodity Futures Modernization Act. It is likely that few senators read this bill, if any. The essence of the act was the deregulation of derivatives trading (financial instruments whose value changes in response to the changes in underlying variables; the main use of derivatives is to reduce risk for one party). The legislation contained a provision -- lobbied for by Enron, a major campaign contributor to Gramm -- that exempted energy trading from regulatory oversight. Basically, it gave way to the Enron debacle and ushered in the new era of unregulated securities. Interestingly enough, Gramm's wife, Wendy, had been part of the Enron board, and her salary and stock income brought in between $900,000 and $1.8 million to the Gramm household, prior to the passage of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act.

In 2003, Gramm left the Senate to join UBS, which had acquired investment house PaineWebber due to his deregulation bill. At UBS, Gramm lobbied Congress, the Fed and the Treasury Department. During Gramm's tenor at UBS and as a lobbyist, Congress passed the Responsible Lending Act, billed as an anti-predatory-lending measure, but was called the "Loan Shark Protection Act" by consumer advocates, as it was designed to preempt stronger state laws against anti-predatory lending. The Fed largely ignored the underlying and growing problems within the subprime mortgage/housing markets, as Bernanke famously acknowledged the housing market in April, 2007 as, "[showing] signs of softening," but said that a "sharp slowdown," is unlikely. Then, according to Mother Jones magazine, Henry Paulson became the Treasury Secretary in July, 2007, when, "In 2005, [at] Goldman [he] securitized $68 billion in residential mortgages and $23 billion in 'other assets' primarily related to CDOs," (Mother Jones, August, 2008). With such self-interest, and a lack of the nation's interest, we can see how this subprime mess was allowed to escalate to such great proportions.

http://losangeles.injuryboard.com/m...phil-gramm-an-experiment-in-deregulation.aspx
 
all of this was done with congress having full knowledge of it. That's why they were called 'toxic assets'.
Honestly, I don't believe many in Congress understand the intricacies of the markets. They do, however, understand the nature of having their brokers earn them truckloads of money, as well as Wall St. lobbyists giving large contributions to re-election coffers.
 
No the repeal of banking regulations alone did not cause the finiancial crisis.
there were many enablers. The main one was stupidity fueled by greed.
 
Don't conservatives espouse laissez-faire in financial markets?
 
Back
Top