The Smearing Of Brett Kavanaugh Is Truly Evil

Oneuli said:
This isn't about playing for time.
Click to expand...

nobody believes you......give it a rest..........Garland sat because the Republicans controlled the senate.......Kavanaugh is sitting not because the demmycrats control anything, but because the demmycrats are prolific liars.........therein lies the difference........
 
blackascoal said:
Fox News Poll: Record number of voters oppose Kavanaugh nomination

1537565396696.jpg


Overall, the 50 percent opposing Kavanaugh is the highest opposition to a Supreme Court nominee in Fox surveys going back to 2005. Forty-six opposed Kavanaugh in August. Before his nomination, the previous high was when 39 percent opposed Neil Gorsuch in March 2017.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...umber-voters-oppose-kavanaugh-nomination.html

Support for Brett Kavanaugh is dwindling among voters amid sexual assault allegations
Multiple polls show that voters are souring on Trump’s Supreme Court nominee.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...naugh-confirmation-poll-christine-blasey-ford

Public support for Kavanaugh had turned negative even before latest allegation of sexual misconduct
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/24/sup...e-latest-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct.html

Trumptards are stupid people.
Click to expand...

unfortunately for you, it doesn't matter.....
 
Oneuli said:
Fortunately, there's nothing magical about Thursday. We have months and months to do this. Heck, Garland waited 293 days without even a hearing, so this is nothing.
Click to expand...

no.....you don't have the votes to delay past Thursday.......we had the votes to defeat Garland......that's how it works.........
 
christiefan915 said:
I'm clipping this paragraph because I also believe a judge's ruling can reflect on his character.

To go back in history, Plessy v. Ferguson was decided 7-1. Scott v. Sanford was decided 7-2.

I wonder how any men of good character could have voted in favor of these cases when slavery is intrinsically evil.
Click to expand...
you are applying contemporary standards to yesteryear. At that time there was a struggle to come to terms with the 14th in the south.
Plessy actually followed precedent that separate but equal satisfied the 14th -
by citing a Mass law of the same.

Looking BACK on it, it was a setback for equal rights in that it took until Brown v Board to rule separate but equal is unConstitutional. But it certainly was an understandable decision FOR IT"S TIME.

And assigning 'bad character" to judges back then because of the ruling shows a misunderstanding of
the forces at play and the decision itself ( backed by precedence).
More likely they were looking for accommodation -though I admit I am no expert on the judges back then
 
christiefan915 said:
Keg City Club (Treasurer); 100 Kegs or Bust; Renate Alumnius; Devil's Triangle; Judge-Have You Boofed Yet? ...etc.

Nothing about National Honor Society or other references to his scholarship.

He didn't say "no sex until marriage", he said no sexual intercourse before marriage. There are other varieties of sex besides intercourse, like BJs for instance. He didn't exclude them by name, or any other type of sexual contact.

Sixty-five women signed a supporting letter yet one of those 65 was a woman whom Brett and his pals boasted she was their "conquest."

Kavanaugh may or may not be a reformed sleazebag but he wasn't so honorable as a student.
Click to expand...
then why would she sign if she was sexually abused?
Keggers were common. He didn't say he didn't drink he aid he drank but not to drinking pass out.

I'm sorry but absent any proof of sexual assault ( -not a vague recollection) and looking at his life from law school on shows a serious guy with lots of women friends who validate for his character.

Did he get a BJ? who cares?? If it wasn't a sexual assault it's meaningless
 
tsuke said:
i do like that we are up to gang rape now. In the space of like a week we went from normal guy to attempted rape to gang rapist lol.
Click to expand...

The left has no shame. In a normal world, these dimwits would have been laughed at, and he'd be nominated a week later. But since the left has hijacked the media, they are able to hold the country hostage, and spread fake news.
 
anatta said:
you are applying contemporary standards to yesteryear. At that time there was a struggle to come to terms with the 14th in the south.
Plessy actually followed precedent that separate but equal satisfied the 14th -
by citing a Mass law of the same.

Looking BACK on it, it was a setback for equal rights in that it took until Brown v Board to rule separate but equal is unConstitutional. But it certainly was an understandable decision FOR IT"S TIME.

And assigning 'bad character" to judges back then because of the ruling shows a misunderstanding of
the forces at play and the decision itself ( backed by precedence).
More likely they were looking for accommodation -though I admit I am no expert on the judges back then
Click to expand...

Some people back then knew slavery was evil and worked to eliminate it. But the buying and selling of human flesh under any pretext is evil. Just because it was an accepted practice in a different century doesn't change that. A lot of people back then were more God-fearing that those today yet they still justified slavery. It's mind boggling. Breaking up families, working people like mules, insisting that slaves bow and scrape to their owners, considering human beings as chattel... and people that Americans revere today were part of it, like Washington and Jefferson. Maybe we don't want to say that the founders had character flaws... well, I do... but they certainly had blind spots about the morality of the practice.

I read history and see pics and articles like these below and it makes me sick.


mp055.jpg
images
400px-Slavezanzibar2.JPG
 
PostmodernProphet said:
but she didn't remember it was Kavanaugh in 2012......she didn't share the name with her husband until 2018........
Click to expand...

Not true.

"In an interview, her husband, Russell Ford, said that in the 2012 sessions, she recounted being trapped in a room with two drunken boys, one of whom pinned her to a bed, molested her and prevented her from screaming. He said he recalled that his wife used Kavanaugh’s last name and voiced concern that Kavanaugh — then a federal judge — might one day be nominated to the Supreme Court."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top