Have you never grabbed a woman by the puss? I sure have,....quiet and few in fact. In my younger years as many as I possibly could. I had a lot more energy back then though with a good strong never ending supply of my precious bodily fluids.Possibly. But the greater fear is that MAGA nation will follow his lead and start the process of normalizing the kind of horrific abuses that DJT may have been involved in.
Look at how they treat the finding that he sexually abused E. Jean Carrol. Or his clear statement that he's OK with molesting women ("Grab em by the pussy"). It means nothing to them.
This one will be a LOT harder for them to swallow, but they've given up so much of their common humanity to this point it doesn't seem like it will be very hard for them to just learn to "accept" Trump as what may be one of the darkest things he is.
Link, otherwise you are lying.@Earl
Are you too embarrassed to give a responsive answer to....
Do you believe Trump's denial that Blondi told him he is in the files?
Have you never grabbed a woman by the puss?
I sure have,....
quiet and few in fact.
I had a lot more energy back then though with a good strong never ending supply of my precious bodily fluids.I will say this though in all fairness....I never once grabbed a puss that didn't want to be grabbed.
President Trump tours the Federal Reserve while these loons wish in one hand…
Not against her will.
Yes, I'm sure you have.
Quiet and few? OK.
Then you are better than Trump. Trump raped a woman and he bragged about molesting women against their
He didn't rape her. We both know that. No need to lieNot against her will.
Yes, I'm sure you have.
Quiet and few? OK.
Then you are better than Trump. Trump raped a woman and he bragged about molesting women against their will.
So you wont answer, understood. We can draw our reasonable conclusion.Link, otherwise you are lying.
You don’t dictate anything…except to whom you send the phone calls.
The sentence contains a predicate phrase.This is an interesting beginning to a sentence. Want to add in a predicate phrase to complete the thought? Or is it sufficient for you guys to just say the holy name, Trump?
no, he was liable for sexual assault.The president was never convicted of rape, he was not even charged with rape.
The president was never convicted of rape, he was not even charged with rape.
Your question pre-supposes guilt…like, do you still beat your wife?So you wont answer, understood. We can draw our reasonable conclusion.
The sentence contains a predicate phrase.
You are just too dense to understand it.
He didn't rape her. We both know that. No need to lie
No, it does not.Your question pre-supposes guilt…like, do you still beat your wife?
Sexual assault is not rape and gopher denies ever meeting the gold digger.no, he was liable for sexual assault.
Inserting something into a woaman's vagina against her will is rape in my book. Maybe not NY law, but to me that is rape.LOL.
Love how much like Pharisees you "Christians" get whenever your real lord and savior is questioned.
Sexual assault is not rape
Inserting something into a woaman's vagina against her will is rape in my book. Maybe not NY law, but to me that is rape.Sexual assault is not rape and gopher denies ever meeting the gold digger.