Indesputable's "points" are just pundit hackery and not worth disputing, becuase they ahve all been disputed so many times before. Kinda like Dano posting the same list of corrupt dem congresmen every couple of days.
I get called all kinds of things by the bushies for posting the same kind of stuff against the right, so why does it only seem to work one way for the bushies ?
Besides there probably have been more corrupt Dems in congressional history because there have been so many more of them than republicans. A statistical thing.
figure it out on a percentage basis per party.