The fact is Netanyahoo has been saying Iran was 2 weeks away from having nukes for decades. He said it many, many times and it was not true. They obviously were not close to nukes. Tulsi's people told her that there was no" close to" nukes going on. Trump has hidden her since she told the truth.
Do you really think you're going to get away with this blatant lie???? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Big fucking deal. Those diaper heads have fucked around for years it's high time they found out.
Nordberg is the lowest IQ of all the mentally deficient posters here. It's really not a close contest.
Ironically your personal idle DJT is the one who is lifting your fake jewdom to new heights.
The original bomb dropped on Hiroshima was 80% Enriched Uranium. The second bomb was Plutonium, which is a byproduct of reactors and is separated chemically... You can use less plutonium for the same boom...
Whch is basically nothing.
Not likely. The Iranian government is the type to attack anyway, even if it's to throw rocks.
I wish no one had nukes, but as long as some countries do, we have to let everyone have them. THINK
No, we don't. Some nations do not display the level of responsibility required. This idea that we "must" let everyone have them is absurd.
Also, you can make a shit ton (a highly technical term) of plutonium relatively easy if you have a fast fission reactor. These are usually either graphite or heavy water moderated (which is why Iran is building one of the later). This gives you the ability to make lots and lots of bombs. Enriching uranium only gives you a handful at most and the process is very costly and time consuming.
Oh yeah, that must be it. What a child you are. And obviously cannot handle facts and the truth. But righties, from Trump down are all about childish insults and name calling. You are in your proper place.
www.jpost.com
You can't blame your problem on anybody else, Sybil.
I'll admit that there's been a lot of seemingly-unfounded screaming about "Iran is ____ [time period] away from having nukes" over the past few decades. After the Dubya "WMD" lie, I've grown much more skeptical of any such claim. Maybe this time it's true though... idk. Gabbard says that Iran is at a point where they could very quickly create a nuke. Rubio and Trump both seem to believe likewise.
Are they really "Tulsi's people"?
Trump has not hidden her and her testimony from March has been purposefully twisted into something that it never actually was as an attempt to push Tulsi out of the DNI position, much like how the media attempted to push Hegseth out of the Sec. of Def. position). Obviously Hegseth and Gabbard are both doing a VERY good job if they have both been identified and targeted as Deep State threats.
That's just plain stupid. He already has high popularity (and part of that is due to his peacemaking agenda). Trump has been very clear that his only point of contention with Iran atm is that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Trump does NOT want war; he wants to see a prosperous Iran, but he doesn't want Iran to have nukes.
