The very divisive president: Joe Biden has unleashed a wave of wokery

no worries said:
Your wish came true.

It wasn't democrats attempting an insurrection at the capitol building, it wasn't democrats calling the press the enemy, banned them for press briefings, blacklisted them from interviews.

It wasn't democrats who militarized virtually every alphabet government agency to be loyal to Trump and do his bidding.

Teabaggers accepted this and more, that makes them akin to dictators, like their dear leader wanted to be.
Click to expand...
ha ha ha. Trump gave interviews to damn near everyone at one time, and the only (temporary) banning was Acosta
for his gross behavior of hogging the mic.
Which i assume is your point since you NEVER CITE

Dems own the cancel culture, and they refuse to condemn Big Tech banning, your party are fascists
 
anatta said:
ha ha ha. Trump gave interviews to damn near everyone at one time, and the only (temporary) banning was Acosta
for his gross behavior of hogging the mic.
Which i assume is your point since you NEVER CITE

Dems own the cancel culture, and they refuse to condemn Big Tech banning, your party are fascists
Click to expand...

Wow, Big Tech banning?

So now, teabaggers want the "gubmint" to CONTROL private enterprise?

After repeatedly calling the media "the enemy of the people" (sound familiar?), Trump banned The New York Times, Buzzfeed News, CNN, the BBC, the Los Angeles Times, and Politico from attending a so-called "gaggle" in Sean Spicer's office on February 24, 2017, which took the place of the normal daily press briefing. Instead, he allowed Breitbart, Fox News, the One America News Network, ABC, CBS, Bloomberg, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Times, all but four (ABC, Wall Street Journal (the news division), CBS, and Bloomberg) of which are practically pro-Trump propaganda outlets.

The way he treats journalists set a new norm for what is acceptable, which has a chilling trickle-down effect. Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price had a reporter arrested for asking him a basic question.
Greg Gianforte, a Montana Republican candidate for the House of Representatives, bodyslammed a Guardian reporter, and was charged with assault on the eve of an election.

Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin argued that NFL players can "have free speech on their own time" as they protested police brutality by sitting or kneeling during the National Anthem. Robert Jeffress, an evangelical advisor to Trump, even said the players were lucky they weren't "shot in the head".
 
no worries said:
Wow, Big Tech banning?

So now, teabaggers want the "gubmint" to CONTROL private enterprise?

After repeatedly calling the media "the enemy of the people" (sound familiar?), Trump banned The New York Times, Buzzfeed News, CNN, the BBC, the Los Angeles Times, and Politico from attending a so-called "gaggle" in Sean Spicer's office on February 24, 2017, which took the place of the normal daily press briefing. Instead, he allowed Breitbart, Fox News, the One America News Network, ABC, CBS, Bloomberg, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Times, all but four (ABC, Wall Street Journal (the news division), CBS, and Bloomberg) of which are practically pro-Trump propaganda outlets.

The way he treats journalists set a new norm for what is acceptable, which has a chilling trickle-down effect. Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price had a reporter arrested for asking him a basic question.
Greg Gianforte, a Montana Republican candidate for the House of Representatives, bodyslammed a Guardian reporter, and was charged with assault on the eve of an election.

Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin argued that NFL players can "have free speech on their own time" as they protested police brutality by sitting or kneeling during the National Anthem. Robert Jeffress, an evangelical advisor to Trump, even said the players were lucky they weren't "shot in the head".
Click to expand...
no we want free speech -while Dems want censorship.. the rest of your post is wandering looking for an intent
You are incapable of making a coherent incisive point, instead relying on unsourced spam
 
anatta said:
ha ha ha. Trump gave interviews to damn near everyone at one time, and the only (temporary) banning was Acosta
for his gross behavior of hogging the mic.
Which i assume is your point since you NEVER CITE

Dems own the cancel culture, and they refuse to condemn Big Tech banning, your party are fascists
Click to expand...

Just after the past two months it should be impossible for Democrats to shriek about fascism with a straight face lol.

But it’s Democrats.

Omg, could even you imagine if Trump had the military to literally occupy DC during his inauguration?

Btw, does anyone have any clips of the riots and violence done by lefties during Trump’s inauguration in 2017? Or did they get accidentally ‘misplaced’ by our Silicon Valley overlords?
 
anatta said:
FBI has taken possession of Hunter Biden's laptops
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...ssession-of-hunter-bidens-laptops/ar-BB1aezOJ

no, we see the Emails -they are influence peddling - I doubt you ever even looked at them
Click to expand...

Insiders said both the FBI and the Department of Justice have concurred with National Intelligence John Ratcliffe's assessment on Monday that there is no evidence to support the files are part of a Russian disinformation scheme.

Ratcliffe shut down the allegations after Democratic House Intel chair Adam Schiff said the documents were a 'smear' on Biden that 'comes from the Kremlin'.

The FBI, however, has declined to confirm whether or not it is examining the laptop and its contents.

In a letter to Republican chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee Ron Johnson on Tuesday, the FBI said it would not be commenting on Ratcliffe's remarks.

'Regarding the subject of your letter, we have nothing to add at this time to the October 19th public statement by the Director of National Intelligence about the available actionable intelligence,' the bureau said.

On January 20, 2020, prior to the Senate impeachment trial, the Trump administration announced Ratcliffe as one of the congressional members of his impeachment team.

Upon the announcement, Ratcliffe said, "I took an oath to defend the Constitution. This impeachment is an assault on due process. It’s an assault on the separation of powers. It's unconstitutional. I'm grateful for the opportunity to make that clear to every American during the Senate trial.

Yeah, thought so a Trumpster.
 
no worries said:
Insiders said both the FBI and the Department of Justice have concurred with National Intelligence John Ratcliffe's assessment on Monday that there is no evidence to support the files are part of a Russian disinformation scheme.

Ratcliffe shut down the allegations after Democratic House Intel chair Adam Schiff said the documents were a 'smear' on Biden that 'comes from the Kremlin'.

The FBI, however, has declined to confirm whether or not it is examining the laptop and its contents.

In a letter to Republican chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee Ron Johnson on Tuesday, the FBI said it would not be commenting on Ratcliffe's remarks.

'Regarding the subject of your letter, we have nothing to add at this time to the October 19th public statement by the Director of National Intelligence about the available actionable intelligence,' the bureau said.

On January 20, 2020, prior to the Senate impeachment trial, the Trump administration announced Ratcliffe as one of the congressional members of his impeachment team.

Upon the announcement, Ratcliffe said, "I took an oath to defend the Constitution. This impeachment is an assault on due process. It’s an assault on the separation of powers. It's unconstitutional. I'm grateful for the opportunity to make that clear to every American during the Senate trial.

Yeah, thought so a Trumpster.
Click to expand...
thats it. you are now an official waste of my time;
constantly citing without SOURCING and using walls of text instead of formulating your own response.

Meaning I am no longer going to attempt a conversation with someone that is too lazy to source
or compose
 
Darth Omar said:
Just after the past two months it should be impossible for Democrats to shriek about fascism with a straight face lol.

But it’s Democrats.

Omg, could even you imagine if Trump had the military to literally occupy DC during his inauguration?

Btw, does anyone have any clips of the riots and violence done by lefties during Trump’s inauguration in 2017? Or did they get accidentally ‘misplaced’ by our Silicon Valley overlords?
Click to expand...

"Omg, could even you imagine if Trump had the military to literally occupy DC during his inauguration"?

Easily, if an attempted insurrection occurred 2 weeks prior?

I wouldn't blame Dotard.

"Just after the past two months it should be impossible for Democrats to shriek about fascism with a straight face lol".

Teabaggers, like their failed dear leader try to gaslight but that only works on other gullible teabaggers.
 
anatta said:
thats it. you are now an official waste of my time;
constantly citing without SOURCING and using walls of text instead of formulating your own response.

Meaning I am no longer going to attempt a conversation with someone that is too lazy to source
or compose
Click to expand...

That's from YOUR source, you fucking retard.
 
no worries said:
"Omg, could even you imagine if Trump had the military to literally occupy DC during his inauguration"?

Easily, if an attempted insurrection occurred 2 weeks prior?

I wouldn't blame Dotard.

"Just after the past two months it should be impossible for Democrats to shriek about fascism with a straight face lol".

Teabaggers, like their failed dear leader try to gaslight but that only works on other gullible teabaggers.
Click to expand...

Have you seen the intelligence that justifies anything more than some standby SWAT teams [which they already have] to stop another ‘insurrection’ by rioters armed mostly with selfie sticks?
 
Darth Omar said:
Have you seen the intelligence that justifies anything more than some standby SWAT teams [which they already have] to stop another ‘insurrection’ by rioters armed mostly with selfie sticks?
Click to expand...

No, but I think the military, DC police and the FBI has, so you think YOU know better?

Yeah, "selfie sticks"? Got that straight from Rannity or the Huckster?
 
anatta said:
Little did anyone imagine that within such a short space of time, millions of Americans who committed the ‘crime’ of voting the wrong way would start to fear that the real threat is not the Biden administration being too close to China but America itself edging worryingly close to China’s authoritarian society.
Click to expand...

No one is coming after people because they voted for trump or for Republicans, that is just the same old Lie that has been fed to the right for Decades, have you not noticed it has Never happened. On the other hand, they are coming for those that are planning acts of terror or attempting to overthrow the duly elected Government of the United States of America, and they should go after them as they are enemies of this Nation.
 
no worries said:
No, but I think the military, DC police and the FBI has, so you think YOU know better?

Yeah, "selfie sticks"? Got that straight from Rannity or the Huckster?
Click to expand...

Observation lol.

I’m not ‘as trusting’ of the alphabet agencies as I used to be. They have some work to do it they want my support back. If they are ‘so on top of things’ why were they AWOL on 1/6?

Is is true Pelosi had something to do with their lack of preparation on 1/6?
 
CASPER said:
No one is coming after people because they voted for trump or for Republicans, that is just the same old Lie that has been fed to the right for Decades, have you not noticed it has Never happened. On the other hand, they are coming for those that are planning acts of terror or attempting to overthrow the duly elected Government of the United States of America, and they should go after them as they are enemies of this Nation.
Click to expand...
no they are not.
This new talk about government boards (reality czar) looking at speech is way beyond specific indictments for terrorism
 
Darth Omar said:
Observation lol.

I’m not ‘as trusting’ of the alphabet agencies as I used to be. They have some work to do it they want my support back. If they are ‘so on top of things’ why were they AWOL on 1/6?

Is is true Pelosi had something to do with their lack of preparation on 1/6?
Click to expand...

Yes, it's true.

Pelosi personally gave every capitol policeman the day off.
 
CASPER said:
No one is coming after people because they voted for trump or for Republicans, that is just the same old Lie that has been fed to the right for Decades, have you not noticed it has Never happened. On the other hand, they are coming for those that are planning acts of terror or attempting to overthrow the duly elected Government of the United States of America, and they should go after them as they are enemies of this Nation.
Click to expand...

Kinda like Dems who have for 4 years cried and tried to impeach and oust a duly elected president?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top