The Witch Trials of J.K. Rowling | The Free Press

Scott

Verified User
Just finished reading this article, thought it was quite good and perhaps worth a bit of discussion. Quoting the introduction and the conclusion...

**
‘You could not have misunderstood me more profoundly.’ A new audio series featuring extensive interviews with the world’s most successful author.

MEGAN PHELPS-ROPER

February 14, 2023

J.K. Rowling is arguably the most successful author in the history of publishing, with the possible exception of God. And “Harry Potter” was a kind of bible for my generation. Since its publication beginning in the late ’90s, the series has taught tens of millions of children about virtues like loyalty, courage, and love—about the inclusion of outsiders and the celebration of difference. The books illustrated the idea of moral complexity, how a person who may at first appear sinister can turn out to be a hero after all.

The author herself became part of the legend, too. A broke, abused, and depressed single mother—writing in longhand at cafes across Edinburgh while her baby girl slept in a stroller beside her—she had spun a tale that begat a global phenomenon. If “Harry Potter” was a bible, then Rowling became a kind of saint.

When she gave the Harvard commencement address in 2008, she was introduced as a social, moral, and political inspiration. Her speech that day was partly about imagination: “the power that enables us to empathize with humans whose experiences we have never shared.”

“We do not need magic to transform our world,” Rowling told the rapt audience. “We carry all the power we need inside ourselves already.”

The uproarious applause that greeted her in 2008 is hard to imagine today. It’s hard to imagine Harvard—let alone any prestigious American university—welcoming Rowling. Indeed, I’m not sure she’d be allowed to give a reading at many local libraries.

That’s because to many, Rowling has since become a kind of Voldemort—the villain of villains in her own stories.


[snip]

These topics are beyond fraught, and I’m grateful to those who were gracious enough to be open and vulnerable with me—often on the most sensitive of subjects. Regardless of where they stood on the issues, many of the people I spoke with expressed similar concerns about going on the record: the waves of personal attacks that seem to come for anyone who speaks up; the fear that listeners would take them out of context; that they would lose their friends, family, career, safety; that their reputations would be destroyed.

I am not immune to these fears. And yet, I remain a believer in the power of conversation. The ones I had for this series challenged my assumptions and showed me that this conflict is even more complex than I had imagined. I don’t pretend to have answers to the deep questions at the heart of this series. But I’m more persuaded than ever that talking—and listening—will help us find the path forward.

**

Full article:
The Witch Trials of J.K. Rowling | The Free Press
 
I've posted a few times about trans activists, they are scum pure and simple.

Wow, we have something in common, sorta. I've posted about MAGA right wingers many times. I'd say they are scum, pure and simple...but that would be an insult to pure and simple scum.
 
Just finished reading this article, thought it was quite good and perhaps worth a bit of discussion. Quoting the introduction and the conclusion...

**
‘You could not have misunderstood me more profoundly.’ A new audio series featuring extensive interviews with the world’s most successful author.

MEGAN PHELPS-ROPER

February 14, 2023

J.K. Rowling is arguably the most successful author in the history of publishing, with the possible exception of God. And “Harry Potter” was a kind of bible for my generation. Since its publication beginning in the late ’90s, the series has taught tens of millions of children about virtues like loyalty, courage, and love—about the inclusion of outsiders and the celebration of difference. The books illustrated the idea of moral complexity, how a person who may at first appear sinister can turn out to be a hero after all.

The author herself became part of the legend, too. A broke, abused, and depressed single mother—writing in longhand at cafes across Edinburgh while her baby girl slept in a stroller beside her—she had spun a tale that begat a global phenomenon. If “Harry Potter” was a bible, then Rowling became a kind of saint.

When she gave the Harvard commencement address in 2008, she was introduced as a social, moral, and political inspiration. Her speech that day was partly about imagination: “the power that enables us to empathize with humans whose experiences we have never shared.”

“We do not need magic to transform our world,” Rowling told the rapt audience. “We carry all the power we need inside ourselves already.”

The uproarious applause that greeted her in 2008 is hard to imagine today. It’s hard to imagine Harvard—let alone any prestigious American university—welcoming Rowling. Indeed, I’m not sure she’d be allowed to give a reading at many local libraries.

That’s because to many, Rowling has since become a kind of Voldemort—the villain of villains in her own stories.


[snip]

These topics are beyond fraught, and I’m grateful to those who were gracious enough to be open and vulnerable with me—often on the most sensitive of subjects. Regardless of where they stood on the issues, many of the people I spoke with expressed similar concerns about going on the record: the waves of personal attacks that seem to come for anyone who speaks up; the fear that listeners would take them out of context; that they would lose their friends, family, career, safety; that their reputations would be destroyed.

I am not immune to these fears. And yet, I remain a believer in the power of conversation. The ones I had for this series challenged my assumptions and showed me that this conflict is even more complex than I had imagined. I don’t pretend to have answers to the deep questions at the heart of this series. But I’m more persuaded than ever that talking—and listening—will help us find the path forward.

**

Full article:
The Witch Trials of J.K. Rowling | The Free Press

This is the state of the world at present. If you dare to speak against woke orthodoxy you will suffer the wrath of the inquisition. Any dissenting voice is swiftly and severely silenced. Independent thought is the enemy. It's comply or die. It's like radical islam, convert or be killed. I'd love for a leftist to explain how this isn't exactly the same thing.
 
This is the state of the world at present. If you dare to speak against woke orthodoxy you will suffer the wrath of the inquisition. Any dissenting voice is swiftly and severely silenced. Independent thought is the enemy. It's comply or die. It's like radical islam, convert or be killed. I'd love for a leftist to explain how this isn't exactly the same thing.

They won't, they are so secure in their beliefs that this just washes over them.
 
They won't, they are so secure in their beliefs that this just washes over them.

But I don't think they are secure in their beliefs. They cant make an argument for any of them. What do they do instead? They label people racist, fascist, homophobe, transphobe etc etc and by doing so they think they have relieved themselves of the responsibility to present an argument. It's intellectually very lazy but not secure.
 
Last edited:
I've posted a few times about trans activists, they are scum pure and simple.

Wow, we have something in common, sorta.

Nice sentence, generally good to point out when you have something in common with someone you generally don't have things in common with.

I've posted about MAGA right wingers many times. I'd say they are scum, pure and simple...but that would be an insult to pure and simple scum.

And here's where you took a turn to the dark side -.-
 
This is the state of the world at present. If you dare to speak against woke orthodoxy you will suffer the wrath of the inquisition. Any dissenting voice is swiftly and severely silenced. Independent thought is the enemy. It's comply or die. It's like radical islam, convert or be killed. I'd love for a leftist to explain how this isn't exactly the same thing.

The fact that we're speaking against the orthodoxy here suggests it's not as bad as that. I think that voices like J.K. Rowling and even a few trans gender people themselves are slowly turning the tide of certain absurdities in the trans gender movement.

I remember one author who I think was generally leftist pointing out that at this point, there are few voices outside of the hard right who are willing to speak loudly against these excesses. Fair enough, but said right is certainly not staying quiet and I think it's having a generally salutory effect.

I think a good example is Matt Walsh's "What is a Women?" Documentary. I definitely think Matt Walsh goes too far the other way sometimes, but I also believe he makes a lot of good points in his documentary. Wikipedia has an article on it for those who haven't heard of it and would like to learn a bit more:

What Is a Woman? | Wikipedia
 
The fact that we're speaking against the orthodoxy here suggests it's not as bad as that. I think that voices like J.K. Rowling and even a few trans gender people themselves are slowly turning the tide of certain absurdities in the trans gender movement.

I remember one author who I think was generally leftist pointing out that at this point, there are few voices outside of the hard right who are willing to speak loudly against these excesses. Fair enough, but said right is certainly not staying quiet and I think it's having a generally salutory effect.

I think a good example is Matt Walsh's "What is a Women?" Documentary. I definitely think Matt Walsh goes too far the other way sometimes, but I also believe he makes a lot of good points in his documentary. Wikipedia has an article on it for those who haven't heard of it and would like to learn a bit more:

What Is a Woman? | Wikipedia

You think the fact that we discuss this on an anonymous website means disputing then orthodoxy isnt that bad???? Seriously? Trying being a pubic figure. There is no reason why people can't openly disagree with what the left is doing but the left goes into a rage when you do. They behave exactly like radical islamists who lose control over cartoons of Mohammed.

As to Matt Walsh that movie,What is a woman, perfectly highlighted the idiocy transology. He did nothig in that movie but ask questions and it drove transologists crazy.
 
You think the fact that we discuss this on an anonymous website means disputing then orthodoxy isnt that bad???? Seriously? Trying being a pubic figure.

I'm not saying it's easy for public figures to buck the trend- J.K. Rowling is a good example. But the fact that some still do it is a good sign in my view.

There is no reason why people can't openly disagree with what the left is doing but the left goes into a rage when you do. They behave exactly like radical islamists who lose control over cartoons of Mohammed.

Some of the left. From what I've seen, J.K. Rowling is generally on the left side in politics, but she's also clearly against the excessess of the transgender movement. From Wikipedia:

**
In politics, she has donated to Britain's Labour Party and opposed Scottish independence and Brexit.
**

Source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._K._Rowling

As to Matt Walsh that movie,What is a woman, perfectly highlighted the idiocy transology. He did nothig in that movie but ask questions and it drove transologists crazy.

I definitely think that he did a pretty good job in that documentary. I'm not sure, but I think I may have decided to watch it after reading reading an article about it from author and journalist Matt Taibi, this one:

"What is a Woman?" A Movie That Should Be Reviewed More, For One Thing | racket.news

He was initially hesitant to wade into the issue, but he did and it certainly took a toll on him:
‘I Lost Friends’: Former Rolling Stone Journalist Talks Reaction To Him Reviewing ‘What Is A Woman’ | dailywire.com

An excerpt from the article:

**
Taibbi didn’t abide by the leftist media rules with Trump and didn’t with the trans issue, either.

Though, he admitted, the trans issue pushback did give Taibbi a momentary pause. “I had kinda tried to stay away from the issue. It’s complicated, and I try to stay away from issues I don’t know a whole lot about,” he said.

More to the point, Taibbi even briefly shelved an interview he did with a prominent feminist who’s critical of radical gender theory. Eventually, Taibbi said his conscience got to him, and he knew he had to release the interview. And he did just that, coupling it with the release of his “What is a Woman?” review, where he called out the Left, specifically academia.

**
 
I'm not saying it's easy for public figures to buck the trend- J.K. Rowling is a good example. But the fact that some still do it is a good sign in my view.



Some of the left. From what I've seen, J.K. Rowling is generally on the left side in politics, but she's also clearly against the excessess of the transgender movement. From Wikipedia:

**
In politics, she has donated to Britain's Labour Party and opposed Scottish independence and Brexit.
**

Source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._K._Rowling



I definitely think that he did a pretty good job in that documentary. I'm not sure, but I think I may have decided to watch it after reading reading an article about it from author and journalist Matt Taibi, this one:

"What is a Woman?" A Movie That Should Be Reviewed More, For One Thing | racket.news

He was initially hesitant to wade into the issue, but he did and it certainly took a toll on him:
‘I Lost Friends’: Former Rolling Stone Journalist Talks Reaction To Him Reviewing ‘What Is A Woman’ | dailywire.com

An excerpt from the article:

**
Taibbi didn’t abide by the leftist media rules with Trump and didn’t with the trans issue, either.

Though, he admitted, the trans issue pushback did give Taibbi a momentary pause. “I had kinda tried to stay away from the issue. It’s complicated, and I try to stay away from issues I don’t know a whole lot about,” he said.

More to the point, Taibbi even briefly shelved an interview he did with a prominent feminist who’s critical of radical gender theory. Eventually, Taibbi said his conscience got to him, and he knew he had to release the interview. And he did just that, coupling it with the release of his “What is a Woman?” review, where he called out the Left, specifically academia.

**

What do you think it's a "good sign" of"? Not being contentious just would like to see you expand on what that means.

The left ignores their own all the time. I have posted at least 2 Bill Maher videos of him blasting the stupidity of the left and the leftists here barely touch them. If people can't be persuaded by your own thats when they become a danger to the rest of us.

I think Matt did in that movie what he always does, calmly and intelligently blew a hole in transology and met them do it with their own words and actions.
 
What do you think it's a "good sign" of"? Not being contentious just would like to see you expand on what that means.

It's a good sign that there is still debate on the issue and I think that debate will continue to grow stronger. I see it as similar to the growing debate on the mainstream covid narrative.

The left ignores their own all the time. I have posted at least 2 Bill Maher videos of him blasting the stupidity of the left and the leftists here barely touch them.

I'm not sure if it was you or someone else, but I remember commenting on a thread concerning Bill Maher. I remember the issue being that the poster who opened the thread was so critical that I thought it'd probably turn people who disagreed with the premise from responding at all. Regardless, I think the fact that even some on the left are criticizing some of the excesses of the transgender movement is another good sign.
 
It's a good sign that there is still debate on the issue and I think that debate will continue to grow stronger. I see it as similar to the growing debate on the mainstream covid narrative.



I'm not sure if it was you or someone else, but I remember commenting on a thread concerning Bill Maher. I remember the issue being that the poster who opened the thread was so critical that I thought it'd probably turn people who disagreed with the premise from responding at all. Regardless, I think the fact that even some on the left are criticizing some of the excesses of the transgender movement is another good sign.

See i donk think there is much of a debate. I dont see her anywhere being asked to "debate" this issue. Have you? I admit I may have missed it?

That was me. The fact is the left dismisses things they disagree with no matter how polite you are. Their default response to anything they don't like is "crazy source". I started a thread yesterday about covid lockdowns. Go look at the first two response. I'd bet my mortage neither one read the article. Leftists are some if the most intellectually lazy people i have ever run across.
 
See i donk think there is much of a debate. I dont see her anywhere being asked to "debate" this issue. Have you? I admit I may have missed it?

That was me. The fact is the left dismisses things they disagree with no matter how polite you are. Their default response to anything they don't like is "crazy source". I started a thread yesterday about covid lockdowns. Go look at the first two response. I'd bet my mortage neither one read the article. Leftists are some if the most intellectually lazy people i have ever run across.

In many ways, I consider myself a leftist. When it comes to the unions, I'm right there with Bernie Sanders and AOC. I don't agree with the majority of them when it comes to Covid, gun control and certain parts of what is labelled the transgender movement, as seen by this thread.
 
What did she say that people claim was offensive?

From the article referenced in the opening post:

**
It all blew up in the summer of 2020.

“‘People who menstruate,’” Rowling wrote on Twitter, quoting a headline. “I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?”

She continued: “If sex isn’t real, there’s no same-sex attraction. If sex isn’t real, the lived reality of women globally is erased. I know and love trans people, but erasing the concept of sex removes the ability of many to meaningfully discuss their lives. It isn’t hate to speak the truth.”

It’s hard to capture the breadth of the firestorm that followed.

Rowling’s words led to a “revolt” among the staff at one of her publishers, an outcry from some of her most ardent fans, and a torrent of negative headlines in news outlets around the globe. Actors who had grown up on the “Harry Potter” film sets—people she had known since they were children—distanced themselves from her. Many of Rowling’s former fans began calling for boycotts. They removed photos of her from their websites and Potter tattoos from their bodies. TikTokers started a trend of covering her name on books and book jackets, and tore her books apart. Players of Quidditch—the fictional sport she invented—ultimately changed its name to dissociate themselves from her. The abhorrence of Rowling has at times been so intense that it’s led to the actual burning of her books. A recent novel even includes a scene where Rowling herself is killed in a fire.

In response to a flood of calls for her to apologize, Rowling refused to back down.

Instead, she published an essay on sex and gender issues, including an account of her violently abusive ex-husband. She said she was writing “out of solidarity with the huge numbers of women who have histories like mine, who’ve been slurred as bigots for having concerns around single-sex spaces.”

For many, Rowling’s clarifications didn’t help. They only further cemented her transformation from a progressive hero into a hateful reactionary. The head of the biggest Potter fansite in the world said she was “heartbroken” and shared a guide on “cancelling” Rowling, while others accused the author of “destroying her legacy.”

**

The article itself has a lot of links to many of the claims above. It's here:
The Witch Trials of J.K. Rowling | The Free Press
 
Back
Top