IBDaMann
Well-known member
Gaetz is not a pedophile, and would make absolutely the best AG. You're still living on the playground, name-calling.So Trump thought a paedophile was the best person in America to be US Attorney General
Gaetz is not a pedophile, and would make absolutely the best AG. You're still living on the playground, name-calling.So Trump thought a paedophile was the best person in America to be US Attorney General
Cypress still has yet to make an honest post. Contributing in a value-added way to a conversation just isn't what he sign up for.I can't believe that any conservatives on this forum are defending the right of men in their 40s to pursue 17 year old girls for sex.
Maybe that's because there aren't any, sex pest.
That's Wikipedia you are citing, a non-authoritative source. Dismissed.![]()
Genetic fallacy - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Cypress still has yet to make an honest post. Contributing in a value-added way to a conversation just isn't what he sign up for.
That's Wikipedia you are citing, a non-authoritative source. Dismissed.
Shouldn't you be over on the Penny thread clamoring for negative attention and barf emojis, TwinkleTwat?![]()
This is what Democrat's are "worried" about.... while Joe commutes the death sentences of many child killers...
They wanted him, until trump moved on.Commuting a death sentence still means they stay in prison. They just don't get killed by a lethal injection. They still die in prison if that helps.
Unlike Matt Gaetz who was about to become Attorney General.
I don't know if you can think very hard about this but the two are NOT the same. Just not.
If you are OK with and WANT a sex predator like Matt Gaetz as attorney general you will have to wait until Trump pardons Ghislane M. and gives her a cabinet post.
You are mistaken. Any appeal to authority must be to an authoritative source, otherwise the appeal is summarily dismissed.Committing another logical fallacy doesn't make you right. It compounds your error.
You are mistaken. Any appeal to authority must be to an authoritative source, otherwise the appeal is summarily dismissed.
You sure believe a lot of things that aren't true. Maybe you should start researching facts and stop just believing.I believe you are a fucking moron
They wanted him, until trump moved on.
I was sleeping with a 14 year old girl when I was 18.
I did? I'd like to see some quotes of that. Start them back 4 years ago then work forward so I can review each one. Provide context as well. Thanks in advance......You spent four years claiming Gaetz didnt do anything wrong.
Gaetz should have become the AG. There was no reason for his nomination to be questioned.Unlike Matt Gaetz who was about to become Attorney General.
He's not a sex predator. Why do you claim that he is, besides your eternal dishonesty?If you are OK with and WANT a sex predator like Matt Gaetz as attorney general
I see that, but you are mistaken.I disagree.
I'll explain. One can appeal to an agreed-upon authoritative source. That's not a problem. If the appeal is to a non-authoritative source, then it becomes an "appeal to authority" fallacy.[misunderstood article deleted]
Nope. It should end here with the above explanation.We can keep this up all day.
Correct. You can cite any authority that I recognize and I'll recognize it. Otherwise, your "appeal to authority" fallacy is discarded.I'll cite a source, and you'll dismiss it?
You can cite any authority that I recognize and I'll recognize it.
“When I use a word,’ ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’"
No. I think she'll wait until someone on the leftist news tells her what to think about it and then tell us all about it.
The FBI and the DOJ wasn't interested . Gaetz holds no public office. Explain to me why this is news.
I cannot believe so many conservatives on this forum are defending the right of men in their 40s to pursue 17 year old girls for sex. None of them have daughters?