The would be AG was a child sex predator

Lionfish said:
Trump's plan is working.

Throw an obvious no-go in as your first choice,

Allow the alt lefties to come unglued,

Carefully, and spaced perfectly, release the names of a myriad of others but allow only a few minutes of leftie bitching until releasing the name of the next one so the gnashing of teeth can begin again,

Most appointments are out now, so release the Gaetz notes, and the left will clutch their pearls, start a dozen threads on every liberal forum and media site possible, dominating their tiny brainpans for days.

Result being,

They have no memory or time to post anything on the other 125+ selections.

Mission accomplished
Click to expand...
3D Chess and the Dems are playing checkers.
 
TOP said:
Don't read them If my style concerns you;)....
Click to expand...

Hey, if you want to look like a subliterate moron, that's your thing. It's just hard to take your points seriously if you don't even know how to use simple punctuation.

TOP said:
This isn't about an eye for an eye
Click to expand...

It is 100% that. Sorry.

TOP said:
.... Sometimes a death sentence isn't the punishment...and sometimes it is.... That's why they have trials.... An eye for an eye would be if the family would have an opportunity to terminate the murderer... In the same way that they took the lives of their family members....
Click to expand...

A SWING AND A MISS!

Here's your "tell": you gave away the game and now I KNOW 100% it is an eye for an eye for you. If you wanted to make a dispassionate argument FOR capital punishment then you would have brought up cost savings (even that doesn't really manifest in the American system) but you didn't even mention it.

It's 100% an eye for an eye with you.

Next time: use punctuation and don't show your hand.
 
ExpressLane said:
I bet Daniel Penny would have tried to stop the illegal immigrant that just set a woman on fire in the subway. Just because owls eat rattle snakes...
Click to expand...

And if he had he would be a hero.

Instead he choked a severely mentally ill guy on the subway for sounding scary.

And he had training in lethal force which he clearly didn't even bother with remembering.
 
Daylight63 said:
Hey, if you want to look like a subliterate moron, that's your thing. It's just hard to take your points seriously if you don't even know how to use simple punctuation.



It is 100% that. Sorry.



A SWING AND A MISS!

Here's your "tell": you gave away the game and now I KNOW 100% it is an eye for an eye for you. If you wanted to make a dispassionate argument FOR capital punishment then you would have brought up cost savings (even that doesn't really manifest in the American system) but you didn't even mention it.

It's 100% an eye for an eye with you.

Next time: use punctuation and don't show your hand.
Click to expand...
If it was a about for an eye then the guy who just set the girl on fire in the subway would be burned to death.... Heinous crimes deserve the death penalty If that is what the trial determines.... It's not about cost.... How do you spell some and not the others however? If you believe in the death penalty you do ...if you don't you don't....right? You seem to be the one missing the point here... Well, one of the ones missing the point....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top