Dr Phil says that people do things over and over again because they get something out of it.
Maybe it a sense of danger.....a lot of people want/need some danger in their lives.
There is no Epstein client list
- Thread starter Walt
- Start date
Maybe it a sense of danger.....a lot of people want/need some danger in their lives.
Could very well be,...still stupid though.
Which is why you are posting about 12b?
Do we still call him doctor, after he lost his license? Is that like Dr Dre?
No I am not, I am posting about the dumb fucks like YOU that can t seem to stop themselves from making dumb 12 B ish type comments. I will be absolutely SHOCKED if you are not banned sometime today Walt. You deserve it.
Everybody knows him as Dr Phil.....I want people to know who I am talking about....so yes.
Everyone knows Dr Dre as Dr Dre... I do not even know his birth name off the top of my head... I still would not want him to do my next colonoscopy. Nor do I think Dr Dre wants to do my next colonoscopy... Just saying.
Dr. Phil lost his license for a reason. Maybe you should start thinking about that before you take his advice.
That is not what he asked. Destroying evidence is not the same thing as raping children. Stop pretending you don't understand the difference between those two things, nobody is fooled by this absurd claim at being "shocked" by what he asked. Though the last line here that you used... that is crossing that line. This will be your only warning. You get one free, we warn, then we ban. Do not be drawn into it.
If he asked if you destroyed evidence, answer that question. Do not try to use this as an insult, do not attempt to "play at words"... You will not like the result.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Umm, Walter? www.newsweek.com/jeffrey-epstein-list-release-2036948
And remember, back in his heyday, Glen Beck went on record in magazine interviews describing himself as a "rodeo clown", and that anyone who took him seriously is an idiot. Look it up.
And remember, back in his heyday, Glen Beck went on record in magazine interviews describing himself as a "rodeo clown", and that anyone who took him seriously is an idiot. Look it up.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
A reminder: @Legion was banned for 12b.
Phanty made him her little bitch.
He has been angry ever since.
Phanty made him her little bitch.
He has been angry ever since.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
This is the way the game has to play out. First step, order the release of all files. Second step, note that these are not all the files and they failed to comply with orders. Demand compliance, again, now that you know who to hold personally accountable.His address book has been made public. As much of his flight files as are known have been made public. There is no client list. There were not actual clients as such.
If I am wrong, then trump can release it and prove me wrong. he already promised to release it. I say if he does not release it, we say it was a list of one: him.
Even Glenn Beck admits, "the #Epsteinfiles are a total joke.
How Longtime Epstein Watchers Reacted to the Release of the ‘Epstein Files’
Reporters who have covered the case for years publicly explained why they think an ‘Epstein List’ is unlikely to ever be released.www.yahoo.com
They have been stone walling the release of the docs for years. Probably hoping for some of the elderly clients to die first so they never be prosecuted, or using it for blackmail.
Last edited:
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
I must have missed the memo where Pam said that.
I do not agree with Damocles opinions on Dodge, so I am "just asked."
I will say before we go into this: I have no connection to Epstein, Maxwell, trump, etc. They do not run in my circles. I am not in any form of law enforcement, nor have ever held public office. Both my jury duties ended in one day; I did not actually sit on a jury.
There is absolutely no reason to "just ask", other than I have a different opinion on the politics of the day.
So back to the question:
No, I am not a coconspirator to the sadistic rape of over a hundred children. I did not destroy the evidence of the sadistic rape of over a hundred children. I have had nothing to do with the rape of any children. The only involvement I have had with any rapes is as a witness for the prosecution(on the side of the victim).
I do not know any of the state or national politicians, and the local politicians I do know are very boring people. None of these people would trust me to destroy evidence of the sadistic rape of over a hundred children.
These word games are beneath you, Damocles. I think deep down inside you know that you are breaking the rules here. If you ban me now or even give me a warning, we all know that it is because I have proven Dodge is a fake!!!
But I will not drag this out anymore, I know you are "just asking". No, I did not destroy any evidence of any rapes, much less the sadistic rape of over a hundred children. I am not the coconspirator to any rapes.
I will say before we go into this: I have no connection to Epstein, Maxwell, trump, etc. They do not run in my circles. I am not in any form of law enforcement, nor have ever held public office. Both my jury duties ended in one day; I did not actually sit on a jury.
There is absolutely no reason to "just ask", other than I have a different opinion on the politics of the day.
Make no mistake about it, destroying the evidence of the sadistic rape of over a hundred children makes one guilty of being the coconspirator to the sadistic rape of over a hundred children. There is no meaningful distinction in the law between being a coconspirator to the sadistic rape of over a hundred children, and actually sadistically raping over a hundred children.
So back to the question:
No, I am not a coconspirator to the sadistic rape of over a hundred children. I did not destroy the evidence of the sadistic rape of over a hundred children. I have had nothing to do with the rape of any children. The only involvement I have had with any rapes is as a witness for the prosecution(on the side of the victim).
I do not know any of the state or national politicians, and the local politicians I do know are very boring people. None of these people would trust me to destroy evidence of the sadistic rape of over a hundred children.
"Did you destroy the evidence of a the sadistic rape of over a hundred children?"
These word games are beneath you, Damocles. I think deep down inside you know that you are breaking the rules here. If you ban me now or even give me a warning, we all know that it is because I have proven Dodge is a fake!!!
Hey, remember when the promise was made to no longer make references to my supposedly "salty semen", how is that going?
But I will not drag this out anymore, I know you are "just asking". No, I did not destroy any evidence of any rapes, much less the sadistic rape of over a hundred children. I am not the coconspirator to any rapes.
Wait, Prince Andrew is involved... We knew that 10 years ago. Even trump's supporters admit this is nothing new.
I guess anyone can make a list of people who knew Epstein, but that does not become Epstein's client list. There is no evidence there is a client list. Epstein's address book was released years ago. Now trump is just releasing random documents with no importance.
It is the common game. He makes up lies, and then says he was just joking. He destroys lives, and then says he was just clowning around. A terrorist attacks a pizza restaurant with children in it, and he says that the terrorist must have misunderstood his joke.
I am going to say that the first step should have been to have a special counsel investigate Epstein. Epstein's whole story begins with Barr's father giving him a teaching job, when he had absolutely no qualifications to teach. I believe this was done based on blackmail, and involved Barr. Barr was Attorney General who collected the evidence of his own blackmail, and demanded to be involved with every part of the investigation.
If there was evidence against Barr or trump, it has long since been destroyed. Talking about releasing it is pointless.
Should the names of children raped be released? Should the name of children who accuse trump of rape be released? Releasing those names could lead to them being murdered by trump's supporters.
If there was evidence, it should be released in court as part of a prosecution. There is a real probability that the government never had the evidence, or it has been destroyed. If the government did have the evidence, it would be when one of the people in that evidence was Attorney General, and another one was president.
So given that Barr and trump were both old friends of Epstein, they may have destroyed the evidence. We do know that Barr's father had been blackmailed by Epstein, but the blackmail evidence appears to have been lost... Or destroyed by Barr.
If there was evidence against Barr or trump, it has long since been destroyed. Talking about releasing it is pointless.
Why hasn't trump done that? Why did trump promise an amazing file release, and then release nothing of any importance?
Should the names of children raped be released? Should the name of children who accuse trump of rape be released? Releasing those names could lead to them being murdered by trump's supporters.
Epstein's entire address book has been released. The flight records that the government has have been released. The "client list" has not been released, but there is no evidence that there is a client list.
If there was evidence, it should be released in court as part of a prosecution. There is a real probability that the government never had the evidence, or it has been destroyed. If the government did have the evidence, it would be when one of the people in that evidence was Attorney General, and another one was president.
So given that Barr and trump were both old friends of Epstein, they may have destroyed the evidence. We do know that Barr's father had been blackmailed by Epstein, but the blackmail evidence appears to have been lost... Or destroyed by Barr.
Or the evidence was destroyed? Odd how you do not want to admit the possibility that Barr destroyed the evidence.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Here's the deal Walter: there was NEVER going to be any list made available to the public, as there are WAY to many high rollers of business and politics involved. It was the main reason that POS was killed. It's my theory that the only reason Ghislaine is still alive because she may have the old "dead letter drop" insurance going on ... meaning if anything happens to her, the list will be released to the public. Either that or she really doesn't have any knowledge outside of the testimony that put her away for 20 years. Just saying.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
There is a client list but since Pedo Don was a top client, it's being hidden. LOLHis address book has been made public. As much of his flight files as are known have been made public. There is no client list. There were not actual clients as such.
If I am wrong, then trump can release it and prove me wrong. he already promised to release it. I say if he does not release it, we say it was a list of one: him.
Even Glenn Beck admits, "the #Epsteinfiles are a total joke.
How Longtime Epstein Watchers Reacted to the Release of the ‘Epstein Files’
Reporters who have covered the case for years publicly explained why they think an ‘Epstein List’ is unlikely to ever be released.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
All the men who work at Lesion's facility are of legal age. Jus' sayin'.
The full address book made public years ago. trump rereleased it with redactions... Which is to say did nothing to make it more public.
The flight logs that remain were also made public years ago.
Amazing number of lists were made public.
I just do not believe there was a client list. It does not make sense. I do believe there was blackmail evidence. Some of that has been made public, but much is not currently in the hands of the government. It was either destroyed by someone, or was hidden and has not been found. So it is not a matter of making it public, but rather finding it.
trump knew he had nothing of any consequence to release, and still he promised he would release something of consequence. It is a bizarre pattern for him. trump's bizarre claims are treated as evidence by the alt right. There have been a dozen threads saying there was going to be a huge release, and acting like the huge release had already happened, and then it was nothing.
Hey, we found out that Prince Andrew was involved with underage girls and Epstein, which we have known for over ten years. We got to see a copy of the picture that we saw the original of ten years ago.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Walt was given a 12B warning yet no one claims to have reported his post asking Lesion how he determines the legal age of a sex partner.
Someone is lying. LOL