There is no Epstein client list
- Thread starter Walt
- Start date
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Exactly. Only the best for our elected leaders in Washington, DC!
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
What was the name of the Republican Congressman who bribed other members of Congress with poker nights where they were allowed to win, and sleep with women provided by the DC Madam?
I don’t remember his name.
There was Vitter, the Republican who was elected Senator before we learned that he had frequented underage prostitutes. Republicans refused to allow his removal, so we were stuck with him for the next 6 years of his Senate term...
AND THEN HE WAS REELECTED!!! The Republicans of Louisiana actually reelected a man so vile that the DC Madam cut him off. Worse yet, they knew about it and reelected him.
But I cannot remember the name of the much older Congressman who went on to become a lobbyist who used poker and prostitutes to bribe a few dozen Republicans.
Into the Night
Verified User
You don't get to speak for everybody, Sybil. Omniscience fallacy.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
You seem to think that regurgitated the supposition and conjecture you put forth in Post #109 will magically make it true, thus negating reality. That you compound your folly with such ignorant and absurd statements as "...To convict people, you need evidence, not a name on a list." is laughable.
Let me educate you on the basics: when you are building a case, you gather evidence. Corroborating evidence comes in the forms of witnesses, participants, forensic accounting, etc. A "list" of participants in crime (cohorts or clients) goes to cementing the credibility of the prosecutor's case. Investigating a name on a list as to who, what, where, when.... money transactions, etc., goes to cementing the credibility of the prosecutor's case.
Any good madam keeps a list of all her regular and high-end clients .... who they are, how much money they spend, preferences, frequency. It's a sort of basic bookkeeping that keeps the money in the bank.
Since prostitution and child trafficking/pornography is illegal in America (for the most part), what I've just explained to you is quite real, quite documented, quite practical.
Got it now? Because if not then you might want to look up the case of former NY Gov. Elliot Spitzer, and NY madam Kristin M. Davis. Get back to me when you're up to speed.
When you are distracting people from that evidence, you suddenly start talking about a magic list.
The prosecutors are trying to get the evidence on how Guiffre went from mar-a-lardo to Epstein's Island. Why was a 14 year old girl working as a bikini clad "towel girl" for tips in the men's changing room of mar-a-lardo?
Feeling the walls close in on him, trump comes up with some magic list he claims he is always about to release, but of course he never does. Even if such a list existed, what would it prove? It is not actual evidence.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
The list is a silver bullet that nobody wants to use.
Your loss of self-control is a sign of immaturity, Rarely Right Walter.
Your lack of self-discipline is apparent to the most casual observer.
Do better, Rarely Right Walter.
Speaking of evidence, Rarely Right Walter, where is the evidence that Barr destroyed evidence, as you posted?
I don't think those "files" are a priority. Nor should they be.
Accused Texas cop-killer’s release from jail on $1M bond sparks outrage: ‘Got to stop these rogue judges’
Accused Texas cop-killer’s release from jail on $1M bond sparks outrage: ‘Got to stop these rogue judges’
“The judge is saying that [officers’] lives and service means absolutely nothing,” raged Jose Lopez, president of the Harris County Deputies’ Organization.
nypost.com
There are more important things to look into...
I am sort of curios where a Texas criminal would get access to so much money...
But I also think your post is another attempt to distract us from trump's involvement in child rape. The two crimes are not related, and America should be able to investigate them both.
Proof that President Trump has been convicted of child rape, Rarely Right Walter, or you are wrong…as usual.
Did I say he has been convicted? In fact, there would be little point in investigating a crime, if trump had already been convicted of it.
Earl does seem to be getting desperate to distract us from trump's involvement in human trafficking. Why is Earl so desperate to cover up the evidence?
So, Rarely Right Walter, you have no proof but you did post this:
“But I also think your post is another attempt to distract us from trump's involvement in child rape.”
This is an accusation of child rape for which he has never been charged or convicted, Rarely Right, Walter.
I hope he sues you.