There is no reversible error in the Chauvin trial

Walt

Back To Reality
There is no reversible error in the Chauvin trial. You do not like the results, that is not reversible error. You think the jury was wrong, that is not appealable. You think they believed the wrong witnesses, well they have the final say on facts.

People spoke out against him... And people spoke out for him. Neither is reversible error.

The Supreme Court has already found that a false guilty verdict is not reversible. In modern America, thanks to the right wing, innocence is not a guarantee of the right to be free from prison. As long as all the legal checkboxes were checked at least well enough to not be reversible, then innocence is no defense.

And there was a lot of evidence against Chauvin. Next time he kills someone, he probably should make sure no one is recording him do it.
 
There is no reversible error in the Chauvin trial. You do not like the results, that is not reversible error. You think the jury was wrong, that is not appealable. You think they believed the wrong witnesses, well they have the final say on facts.

People spoke out against him... And people spoke out for him. Neither is reversible error.

The Supreme Court has already found that a false guilty verdict is not reversible. In modern America, thanks to the right wing, innocence is not a guarantee of the right to be free from prison. As long as all the legal checkboxes were checked at least well enough to not be reversible, then innocence is no defense.

And there was a lot of evidence against Chauvin. Next time he kills someone, he probably should make sure no one is recording him do it.

Appellate Court means nothing to the jew.
 
They cannot overturn a conviction, just because it upsets you.

Hey jew boy, how come you wanted to talk to Billy about anti-semitism when even you admitted he never said anything anti-semitic yet here I am right in front of you and you don't wanna talk jew shit at all?

I know why, it's because you jews are natural liars.
 
Hey jew boy, how come you wanted to talk to Billy about anti-semitism when even you admitted he never said anything anti-semitic yet here I am right in front of you and you don't wanna talk jew shit at all?

I know why, it's because you jews are natural liars.

So non-Jews are unnatural liars? They do a pretty good job of faking what does not come naturally. Do you not realize how idiotic your premise is?
 
There is no reversible error in the Chauvin trial. You do not like the results, that is not reversible error. You think the jury was wrong, that is not appealable. You think they believed the wrong witnesses, well they have the final say on facts.

People spoke out against him... And people spoke out for him. Neither is reversible error.

The Supreme Court has already found that a false guilty verdict is not reversible. In modern America, thanks to the right wing, innocence is not a guarantee of the right to be free from prison. As long as all the legal checkboxes were checked at least well enough to not be reversible, then innocence is no defense.

And there was a lot of evidence against Chauvin. Next time he kills someone, he probably should make sure no one is recording him do it.

Bags of them, all the way down to misrepresentation. His lawyers never even made a case on his behalf. They just stood up and made a red herring shit on the courtroom floor. So what if someone healthy would have been fine. What does that have to do with the price of tea in china?
 
Bags of them, all the way down to misrepresentation. His lawyers never even made a case on his behalf.

Well, I suppose time will tell. If this is reversed on appeal, then I will be proven wrong. If not, then people like Guille will keep claiming they are right, even as they are proven wrong.

Chauvin get a much better defense than most defendants get. The evidence just was not with them.

So what if someone healthy would have been fine. What does that have to do with the price of tea in china?

It seriously does not matter. You take your victim's health the way you find it. If a younger, healthier man would have survived, Chauvin probably should have done it to a younger, healthier man... Or better yet not done it at all.
 
Well, I suppose time will tell. If this is reversed on appeal, then I will be proven wrong. If not, then people like Guille will keep claiming they are right, even as they are proven wrong.

Chauvin get a much better defense than most defendants get. The evidence just was not with them.



It seriously does not matter. You take your victim's health the way you find it. If a younger, healthier man would have survived, Chauvin probably should have done it to a younger, healthier man... Or better yet not done it at all.

The fact is, his lawyers took a red herring shit on the courtroom floor. They talked about the price of tea in china, not floyd.
 
Besides that anyone can see he wasnt pushing the guy's neck. Like what...

Looks like a city treasury plunder scam and likely everyone including the defendant was a party to it. Minneapolis is going to bankrupt itself just to leave the rioters a lump of shit.
 
Its interesting in this vid*

Code:
https://youtu.be/xRoqSyIi-98

The guy fails to explain what he explained here

Code:
https://youtu.be/QKIobyk6Isc


Which basically amounts to the fact that you can literally hold your breath until you’re dead when you’re on dope like fentanyl. You also would never need to announce you couldnt breath let alone in a suspicious emotionless monotone. This floyd thing looks scripted and rehearsed.

And lets not forget what happened next, the death was used by racists to launch a race riot.

There’s two ways for the queen’s honor guard to get paid. One of them is to do stupid sht for the camera for a kickback from newspapers.
Heres what happened. A black guy commits suicide by cop with his buddy he works and shares lines with so his family can get a lawsuit and the cop can get a kickback. The death was used by enemy subversives to incite race riots and radicalise leftist sympathizers who deal them both the cheap drugs they both use.

and we're just to suppose the da never thought of this as they leave the city open to lawsuits?

dude will do his time like a pro knowing he'll get a big daddy kickback from mafia backed dixiecrats when he gets out.

https://deplorablefeed.com/u-s-sold...-blowing-whistle-on-afghan-muslim-pedophiles/

Btw, i tracked this deplorablefeed group to bulgaria. But pretty sure it’s all legit.
 
You have a really bad surprise in your immediate future. It really is not reversible error that someone said people should protest if the decision works against them.
hey dummy:
it wasnt "protest" it was "confrontation"..see if you can figure it out from there
 
Yes, she used King's word for how to protest.
King isnt relevant anymore. sadly.
Woke dont follow his ideal of judging people by their character -Woke judges them by skin color.

confrontation is the language of ANTIFA/BLM - in case you missed the fact riots are commonplace events
 
There is no reversible error in the Chauvin trial. You do not like the results, that is not reversible error. You think the jury was wrong, that is not appealable. You think they believed the wrong witnesses, well they have the final say on facts.

People spoke out against him... And people spoke out for him. Neither is reversible error.

The Supreme Court has already found that a false guilty verdict is not reversible. In modern America, thanks to the right wing, innocence is not a guarantee of the right to be free from prison. As long as all the legal checkboxes were checked at least well enough to not be reversible, then innocence is no defense.

And there was a lot of evidence against Chauvin. Next time he kills someone, he probably should make sure no one is recording him do it.

The Chauvin conviction was tainted by Mad Maxine, Biden and the vigilante mob. And that, irreversible Alter Walter.
 
Back
Top