There was no fraud. The election was perfect. SHUT UP.

Into the Night said:
Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism). No, you cannot show election fraud just by pointing at Biden in the White House.

While there are all the signs that Biden's brain is indeed mostly dead, this is not a murder case nor a case of someone causing Biden's deranged behavior.

A false equivalence fallacy. Also an unnecessary argument. There is plenty of evidence of election fraud by Democrats. You don't have to make a circular argument anywhere.
Click to expand...

no it isn't.

it is evidence that he is currently in possession of that which was stolen.

quit being so jealous of me that you bicker over dumb shit.
 
Into the Night said:
Biden's installment is not evidence. However, the unconstitutional rule changes certainly are evidence of election fraud.
Click to expand...

LOL. Since you want to make the claim that changes were "unconstitutional" please cite the court case that says any changes were unconstitutional.

If you can't cite a court case then provide enough evidence to convince a court. Until you do that you are simply blowing smoke out your ass. Something you seem to do a lot since you don't live in reality.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
LOL. Since you want to make the claim that changes were "unconstitutional" please cite the court case that says any changes were unconstitutional.

If you can't cite a court case then provide enough evidence to convince a court. Until you do that you are simply blowing smoke out your ass. Something you seem to do a lot since you don't live in reality.
Click to expand...

The Constitution is not a court.
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
I think the crucial point is that Trump won in 2016, albeit with a minority of the vote. So everything must have been A-OK, right?
That must have been one exceptional year when there was no fraud.
P.S. Trump warned there was going to be fraud, but changed his mind when he found out he'd won.
Click to expand...

Another uneducated dimwit who thinks we elect presidents based on popular vote. A shining example of how badly our educational establishment has failed this nation.

Time to abolish the unconstitutional Department of Education. :palm:
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
90% is the number of votes for President divided by the number of registered voters cited by Statistica in 2008

Why is 94% proof of fraud and 90% not proof of fraud? Provide evidence to support your claim.

Then provide evidence that 75% of the elections in Australia in the last 75 years have been fraudulent.

Do you need the nurse to help you with the velcro on your shoes? Try pushing the red button.
Click to expand...

Alas, dumb cunt, 90% is not greater than 94%. Now run along. You're not serious and your mentally handicapped. :palm:
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
So, Poopiehead, are you claiming that the elections in Australia since 1934 are fraudulent? Or are you claiming Australia is a 3rd world shithole?
Click to expand...

tenor.gif

tenor.gif
 
Truth Detector said:
Another uneducated dimwit who thinks we elect presidents based on popular vote. A shining example of how badly our educational establishment has failed this nation.

Time to abolish the unconstitutional Department of Education. :palm:
Click to expand...

Agreed. It should never had been formed. Congress never had authority to create it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top