This is not a Florida hurricane. They are not going to get $300 billion.if the damages total $300 billion
This is not a Florida hurricane. They are not going to get $300 billion.if the damages total $300 billion
Tuberville and TDAK, being intellectul equals, would be likely to feel the same way about it.
This is not a Florida hurricane. They are not going to get $300 billion.
That is a huge amount. We should be thankful to the state of California.In the last fiscal year, the state of California contributed approximately 568 billion dollars in federal tax revenue to the US Treasury.
That's a bit higher than the current estimate of 250-275 Billion. That's why I used that number.This is not a Florida hurricane. They are not going to get $300 billion.
You think there will be $250 billion in aid for the fires? Really?That's a bit higher than the current estimate of 250-275 Billion. That's why I used that number.
That's kind of beside the point. I'm not really trying to nail down the exact number. I figured the high end of any estimate would drive home the point a little easier. Guess not.You think there will be $250 billion in aid for the fires? Really?
Basically, blue states have been subsidizing red states for decades. Every time the blue states need a little help, we get this reaction where red states say no way. Maybe it is time we say no way to red states too?That's kind of beside the point. I'm not really trying to nail down the exact number. I figured the high end of any estimate would drive home the point a little easier. Guess not.
Interesting take, I'm unaware of all the subsidies that blue states shower red states with. Examples?Basically, blue states have been subsidizing red states for decades. Every time the blue states need a little help, we get this reaction where red states say no way. Maybe it is time we say no way to red states too?
HAHAHAHA. Listen to this loony. He says the karen bass wildfires will cost $300 billion but that's no big deal!!!I can certainly understand the sentiment. Let's look at some quick numbers: if the damages total $300 billion, divided among California's estimated 20 million taxpayers, that's roughly $15,000 per taxpayer. While this might seem substantial at first glance, like any significant expense, the cost would be spread out over time, making it quite manageable with fairly small sacrifices for Californians. Especially considering all of the ridiculous spending for crazy policies could easily be cut, if the public makes their voices heard. I'm not advocating for this approach, but I'm also not dismissing it outright. If California decides to rebuild with a host of environmentally-focused regulations, I would simply highlight this basic math and wish them luck.
What's with all the lines through the text?
You've got it backwards. Most of the illegals are in blue states and it's the rest of the country that pays for them.Basically, blue states have been subsidizing red states for decades.
Like Florida and the Carolina’s’ with hurricane relief, oh wait, they never paid in more than the tookGiven the available information, it's unlikely that California's direct contributions to the U.S. Treasury in 2024 would singularly offset the projected costs of wildfires that year. The costs associated with wildfires including federal disaster relief, insurance payouts, and other economic impacts go beyond what the state contributes to the federal government in taxes.
@Grok
Like Florida and the Carolina’s’ with hurricane relief, oh wait, they never paid in more than the took
YesIs that so?
That’s bullshit, Florida and Texas lead the country in illegal populations (https://www.pewresearch.org/short-r...out-unauthorized-immigrants-living-in-the-us/)You've got it backwards. Most of the illegals are in blue states and it's the rest of the country that pays for them.
I hope the MAGA people start withholding aid for political reasons.
That way when MAGA is out of power someone can return the favor.
Florida and Texas lead the country in illegal populations
Do you?