They egged Bush...

ib1yysguy said:
You keep lying. No, you didn't say I argued for more leniency. The guy was sentenced I don't remember how, but it probably wasn't stiff enough. I argued he shouldn't be put to death, which was far more severe than what he was actually sentenced to.

Jesus Christ. Just stop fucking lying.
Click to expand...
As it stands, we agree on one thing. He shouldn't be put to death.

But, IMO, he should live out the remainder of his life in Supermax, never allowed to speak to another human being except through a slot in a door.
 
Yurt said:
do you deny that you said he should not be put to death becuase of memory issues....
Click to expand...

You'd have to read the original thread. Yes I deny that's why I don't think the guy should be put to death. There were a myriad of reasons - not the least of which being the baby wasn't physically harmed which indicates there was no penetration or physical harm that one would imagine from what Dano was saying.

The guy was clearly doing inexcusable things, but not things worthy of the death penalty.
 
Damocles said:
As it stands, we agree on one thing. He shouldn't be put to death.

But, IMO, he should live out the remainder of his life in Supermax, never allowed to speak to another human being except through a slot in a door.
Click to expand...

Whatever. I don't presume the know the circumstances of the case other than what I read. You pretend that you have seen the evidence and are in a place to make a determination on what sentence is warranted.

Are you drinking or something? You're really off today.
 
ib1yysguy said:
You keep lying. No, you didn't say I argued for more leniency. The guy was sentenced I don't remember how, but it probably wasn't stiff enough. I argued he shouldn't be put to death, which was far more severe than what he was actually sentenced to.

Jesus Christ. Just stop fucking lying.
Click to expand...
Jesus isn't lying here. Nor am I.

Did you, or did you not advocate something more lenient than the consensus?
 
ib1yysguy said:
Whatever. I don't presume the know the circumstances of the case other than what I read. You pretend that you have seen the evidence and are in a place to make a determination on what sentence is warranted.

Are you drinking or something? You're really off today.
Click to expand...
Nope. But I do suspect that you and Desh are. Both of you seem a bit "off" today.

Silly people trying to suggest I supported the death penalty.
 
ib1yysguy said:
No. I didn't say it wasn't bad. I said it wasn't worthy of the death penalty. You are a dishonest fuck.
Click to expand...
I didn't realize you were so sensitive about this one. I am sorry, ib1yysguy, I meant to tease and let it get out of hand.

It won't happen again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top