They killed Peanut for nothing

The Trump Administration said:
Alleged.
Click to expand...
LOL

I ❤️TRIGGERED MAGAts :rofl2::laugh::rofl2:
8yw6de.jpg

 
ADreamOfLiberty said:
I wondered if I would ever encounter one so vile as to support an armed assault to kill a happy harmless squirrel on behalf of a Karen and in the name of fearing the government. Now I have.
Click to expand...
The squirrel was not killed in an "armed assault." Deer, squirrels, and other animals are killed by hunters in "armed assaults"; have you ever met a hunter?
 
The Trump Administration said:
Alleged.
Click to expand...
If they are lying about the squirrel biting someone, maybe they are lying about having euthanized the squirrel... Maybe they are lying about the squirrel ever existing.

How do we know any squirrels actual exist?

You have brought up some interesting questions... Or they would be interesting if we were smoking pot. I have adult responsibilities, so can not join you in your pot smoking.
 
The New York Department of Environmental Conservation has launched an internal investigation after the agency seized a pet squirrel named Peanut who was later euthanized, sparking national outrage.

Squirrels “almost never” get rabies, according to the New York State Department of Health.

 
U.S. spending on pet food alone is almost $60 billion a year. $147 billion for the whole pet industry. This is important because a lot of old people rely on pet food to survive and and when they kill Social Security by handing it over to Wall Street to steal it blind it will be the major source of food for a majority of Americans soon. Social Security also feds a lot of grandkids these days.

Squirrels? lol who cares? Tree rats.
 
EdwinA said:
U.S. spending on pet food alone is almost $60 billion a year. $147 billion for the whole pet industry. This is important because a lot of old people rely on pet food to survive and and when they kill Social Security by handing it over to Wall Street to steal it blind it will be the major source of food for a majority of Americans soon. Social Security also feds a lot of grandkids these days.

Squirrels? lol who cares? Tree rats.
Click to expand...
If you do not know the news story, maybe do not post about it?
 
Walt said:
The squirrel was not killed in an "armed assault." Deer, squirrels, and other animals are killed by hunters in "armed assaults"; have you ever met a hunter?
Click to expand...
There was an armed assault, and the purpose of that armed assault was to kill a squirrel (and break the spirit of anyone who would defy irrational regulation).

Thus "armed assault" "to" "kill squirrel"

Never met a hunter who hunted people's pets because they get a kick out of watching people suffer, and then lied to make it appear as if they did it for some noble purpose. If I did, I would similarly wish that they would... cease to persist in their metabolic activities.
 
ADreamOfLiberty said:
There was an armed assault, and the purpose of that armed assault was to kill a squirrel (and break the spirit of anyone who would defy irrational regulation).

Thus "armed assault" "to" "kill squirrel"

Never met a hunter who hunted people's pets because they get a kick out of watching people suffer, and then lied to make it appear as if they did it for some noble purpose. If I did, I would similarly wish that they would... cease to persist in their metabolic activities.
Click to expand...
One cannot assault a squirrel. It just is not a thing. Squirrels fight all the time, and it is not considered assault. Human laws do not get involved.

The squirrel was euthanized two days after being seized. For the rabies test to be performed, the brain had to be dissected. That would be difficult if the squirrel had been shot. It is safe to say, the animal was not killed with a gun.
 
Walt said:
One cannot assault a squirrel. It just is not a thing. Squirrels fight all the time, and it is not considered assault. Human laws do not get involved.

The squirrel was euthanized two days after being seized. For the rabies test to be performed, the brain had to be dissected. That would be difficult if the squirrel had been shot. It is safe to say, the animal was not killed with a gun.
Click to expand...
You're either autistic or intentionally trying to twist context.

I don't give a shit how they killed the squirrel or when. I give a shit that they broke into a man's home with guns for no greater purpose than to kill a squirrel. Not to defend the rights of man. Not to save a kidnapped victim. To kill a squirrel.

Now if you can't figure that out, you shouldn't be on an internet forum.

If, as I find more likely, you're pretending that you can't figure that out for the highly questionable honor of being the obtuse champion of tyrannical government then my initial sentiment upon commenting seems even more sound.
 
ADreamOfLiberty said:
I give a shit that they broke into a man's home with guns for no greater purpose than to kill a squirrel.
Click to expand...
A lot of lies in one sentence there. No one broke into the house... In any sense of the word. They knocked on the front door, and gained access with a warrant. There were no police officers, so probably no one was armed. The purpose of the animal seizure was not to kill the animals.
 
Walt said:
A lot of lies in one sentence there. No one broke into the house... In any sense of the word. They knocked on the front door, and gained access with a warrant.
Click to expand...
I don't believe a word you say, obvious dog of the state that you are, but threats of government force qualify as breaking in.

Walt said:
The purpose of the animal seizure was not to kill the animals.
Click to expand...
Of course it was. You are clueless or malicious and if you don't have anymore more to say that repeating government propaganda in your next post I'll ignore it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top