Thieves

[Cancel 2016.2]

'

This is amazing. Large corporations being allowed to keep their employee's state tax payments, without the employees even being informed, and SF has no problem with this.

What's the big deallllll? Nothing to see here! Move along!

Meanwhile in another thread he is waxing poetic about how single mothers on welfare have no dignity because they aren't working. LOL

Hilarious.

Well, this is what you get when you vote Republican folks. Is it working for you? Nope, but it's working for Exxon Mobile.

LMAO... yeah, because that is what I said. You on the other hand would be fine if they simply let the state collect it and had the state in turn grant them a tax break or incentive or cash. You just want the state to collect it before handing it back.

Please tell me where I stated people shouldn't be informed.

Where did I state they have no dignity?

Seriously, how many fucking lies are you going to tell in one day?

I know you liberals have some sort of quota, but this is quite sad, even for you.

 

[Damocles]

'

This is amazing. Large corporations being allowed to keep their employee's state tax payments, without the employees even being informed, and SF has no problem with this.

What's the big deallllll? Nothing to see here! Move along!

Meanwhile in another thread he is waxing poetic about how single mothers on welfare have no dignity because they aren't working. LOL

Hilarious.

Well, this is what you get when you vote Republican folks. Is it working for you? Nope, but it's working for Exxon Mobile.

Question. How would it be different if they forced them to send the money in only to write a check for the subsidy? And do you think it would be wiser to simply ignore the current "outsourcing" incentives and not work to keep these same people's jobs right where they are?

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Daaaaarlaaaa......I know you've posted here since I asked you a question in post #20......I think you've had time enough to think up an answer......