This is how you do a protest

26907833_1320751374724704_7212854936372102252_n.jpg
 
If , instead of just blurting out your ignorance (as per usual), you took, say, 30 seconds to research the facts on Google, you would find that Blacks in the US kill a lot of people with guns every year. BUT the overwhelming majority of their fellow Americans that they kill are OTHER BLACKS. You can access the official FBI statistics on line for free.

Dachshund

Well, obviously, if you keep people locked up in ghettoes, prevent their working and sell them plenty of drugs and guns, so that selling drugs on it the only way to make a living, they will tend to kill one another in large numbers. That's what you do it for, surely?
 
What is your issue with responsible gun owners?

I have to say that swastika wearing fake soldiers with gun knowledge of gun safety are not "responsible gun owners". They are the best argument against what they are protesting for.
 
I have to say that swastika wearing fake soldiers with gun knowledge of gun safety are not "responsible gun owners". They are the best argument against what they are protesting for.
Where do you see these "swastika wearing fake soldiers" ? There's school today, btw;)
 
I doubt it. Republicans fought Obama on everything, no matter what the issue was. But he never made an attempt to take away the guns, anyway. So this fear-mongering is pretty much just based on angry Fox News segments.

Tell that to Virginians (or Californians for that matter).
 
Even when I was living in New York, most of the gun-owners I knew had enough sense to know that the Deep State Swamp Never Trumpers Radical Socialist Democrats Nazi Soviets aren't coming to take our guns and stick us in a death panel.
Sure, there were some Conservatards who thought that. But these are the kind of people who also think Obama is a Muslim Communist. I'm fine with people owning guns and I don't think all Conservatives are this bad. But the people who went to the retard rally belong to a very specific branch of the Right.

You really are clueless if you don't see the issue with the upcoming Virginia legislation. I suppose you also ignored the handgun bans in DC and Chicago before they were struck down by the Supreme Court.
 
There actually is a reason behind it.
Most Americans don't really care about the issues, they care about belonging to a team. You're either on the Left or the Right. A major cornerstone of the Right is trying to turn back time. This is why Nationalism is generally a right-wing thing, but so is sexism. Most women side with the Left because of the sexism, but that means they also have to give up Nationalism.
It's too bad, a lot of girls actually are interested in the Alt-Right, but then when they see how sexist and homophobic they are, they go straight back to the Left.

I'm pretty black pilled, but I do think it's possible that one day the Left will embrace Nationalism again. Outside of the West, everyone is Nationalist, regardless of politics. In Europe, because liberal policies have worked so well for so long, right-wing Nationalists tend to also be Social Democrats who support women and LGBT rights. So yeah, mostly black pilled with a little white pill.

I wouldn't say that LGBT rights have worked so well recently, when it comes to the T in the LGBT. Trans activists want compelled speech and thought crimes.
 
I have to say that swastika wearing fake soldiers with gun knowledge of gun safety are not "responsible gun owners". They are the best argument against what they are protesting for.

Yet they were not violent in any way. Your accusations don't count.

This is your leftist logic in action...

"If our colleges and universities do not breed men who riot, who rebel, who attack life with all the youthful vision and vigor, then there is something wrong with our colleges. The more riots that come out of our college campuses, the better the world for tomorrow." -William Allen White

http://www.progressivedisorder.com/ViolentProtests.shtml
 
I wouldn't say that LGBT rights have worked so well recently, when it comes to the T in the LGBT. Trans activists want compelled speech and thought crimes.

No they don't. People like Jordan Peterson are lying when they say trans people are forcing us to use the right pronouns. If that was true, Peterson and that whiny Jew, Ben Shapiro, would be in jail by now.
I'm sure there are some trans Fascists who want this, since any group is capable of being Fascist, but I haven't seen any mainstream trans activists calling for thought crime laws.
 
You really are clueless if you don't see the issue with the upcoming Virginia legislation. I suppose you also ignored the handgun bans in DC and Chicago before they were struck down by the Supreme Court.

What exactly is the Virginia legislation? Do you have a link showing what they want to do?
 
Oh, so now it's gun rights protesters are retards? Apparently it's only liberal protesters who aren't retarded? What is your issue with responsible gun owners?

No, if the government actually does want to ban guns, I wouldn't blame gun-owners for protesting. But that's not happening. This was a retard rally because it was for people protesting against a threat that doesn't exist. These are cucks just desperate for attention.
 
No they don't. People like Jordan Peterson are lying when they say trans people are forcing us to use the right pronouns. If that was true, Peterson and that whiny Jew, Ben Shapiro, would be in jail by now.
I'm sure there are some trans Fascists who want this, since any group is capable of being Fascist, but I haven't seen any mainstream trans activists calling for thought crime laws.

In the UK, they most certainly have compelled speech.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-humber-47005937

Canada has a similar problem. Lindsay Shepherd was most certainly abused over trans related issues, which was rather ironic, since she initially was a progressive. After what she went through, she's been somewhat redpilled.

So, if you want to talk about fascists, plenty of the LGBT activists have enabled them.
 
What exactly is the Virginia legislation? Do you have a link showing what they want to do?

First, there is the red flag law that the Senate passed. https://www.whsv.com/content/news/V...after-massive-gun-rights-rally-567172341.html

The Senate assault weapons ban was recently killed in committee, but that was likely in part due to the protests. It would have likely passed otherwise.

They passed a bill to limit 1 handgun purchase per 30 days, which really serves no safety purpose. http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?201+sum+SB69

There still is a version of the assault weapons ban in the House. http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?ses=201&typ=bil&val=hb961

http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?201+ful+HB961+pdf

Page 7 of the above pdf explains that an assault weapon is defined as: 1. A semi-automatic center-fire rifle that expels single or multiple projectiles by action of an
explosion of a combustible material with a fixed magazine capacity in excess of 10 rounds;
2. A semi-automatic center-fire rifle that expels single or multiple projectiles by action of an
explosion of a combustible material that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine and has one of
the following characteristics: (i) a folding or telescoping stock; (ii) a pistol grip that protrudes
conspicuously beneath the action of the rifle; (iii) a thumbhole stock; (iv) a second handgrip or a
protruding grip that can be held by the non-trigger hand; (v) a bayonet mount; (vi) a grenade launcher;
(vii) a flare launcher; (viii) a silencer; (ix) a flash suppressor; (x) a muzzle brake; (xi) a muzzle
compensator; (xii) a threaded barrel capable of accepting (a) a silencer, (b) a flash suppressor, (c) a
muzzle brake, or (d) a muzzle compensator; or (xiii) any characteristic of like kind as enumerated in
clauses (i) through (xii);
3. A semi-automatic center-fire pistol that expels single or multiple projectiles by action of an
explosion of a combustible material with a fixed magazine capacity in excess of 10 rounds;
4. A semi-automatic center-fire pistol that expels single or multiple projectiles by action of an
explosion of a combustible material that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine and has one of
the following characteristics: (i) a folding or telescoping stock; (ii) a thumbhole stock; (iii) a second
handgrip or a protruding grip that can be held by the non-trigger hand; (iv) the capacity to accept a
magazine that attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip; (v) a shroud that is attached to, or
partially or completely encircles, the barrel and that permits the shooter to hold the pistol with the
non-trigger hand without being burned; (vi) a manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when the
pistol is unloaded; (vii) a threaded barrel capable of accepting (a) a silencer, (b) a flash suppressor, (c)
a barrel extender, or (d) a forward handgrip; or (viii) any characteristic of like kind as enumerated in
clauses (i) through (vii);


I left out the description of an "assault shotgun", since they apparently believe those exist too.

Overall, if the assault weapons ban passes, that will encompass a huge portion of rifles and handguns.
 
In the UK, they most certainly have compelled speech.

Sure, but not because of trans people. The UK had laws against hate speech way before trans people started pushing for equal rights and recognition. It's like that in most of Europe.

Canada has a similar problem. Lindsay Shepherd was most certainly abused over trans related issues, which was rather ironic, since she initially was a progressive. After what she went through, she's been somewhat redpilled.

So, if you want to talk about fascists, plenty of the LGBT activists have enabled them.

Are you referring to the Twitter incident? Twitter is a private company, so that didn't have anything to do with free speech.
 
California and Virginia still have guns. Obama was annoyingly centrist, he was never going to do anything like that.

I mentioned those 2 states, because the state governments have been very invasive about guns. Usually gun grabbing starts at the state level. When the Democrats get enough federal power, they sometimes pass legislation like the AWB of the 90s.

To be fair, Republicans were guilty of supporting this nonsense in the 80s, like with the Brady Bill and the original FOPA.
 
First, there is the red flag law that the Senate passed. https://www.whsv.com/content/news/V...after-massive-gun-rights-rally-567172341.html

The Senate assault weapons ban was recently killed in committee, but that was likely in part due to the protests. It would have likely passed otherwise.

They passed a bill to limit 1 handgun purchase per 30 days, which really serves no safety purpose. http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?201+sum+SB69

There still is a version of the assault weapons ban in the House. http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?ses=201&typ=bil&val=hb961

http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?201+ful+HB961+pdf

Page 7 of the above pdf explains that an assault weapon is defined as: 1. A semi-automatic center-fire rifle that expels single or multiple projectiles by action of an
explosion of a combustible material with a fixed magazine capacity in excess of 10 rounds;
2. A semi-automatic center-fire rifle that expels single or multiple projectiles by action of an
explosion of a combustible material that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine and has one of
the following characteristics: (i) a folding or telescoping stock; (ii) a pistol grip that protrudes
conspicuously beneath the action of the rifle; (iii) a thumbhole stock; (iv) a second handgrip or a
protruding grip that can be held by the non-trigger hand; (v) a bayonet mount; (vi) a grenade launcher;
(vii) a flare launcher; (viii) a silencer; (ix) a flash suppressor; (x) a muzzle brake; (xi) a muzzle
compensator; (xii) a threaded barrel capable of accepting (a) a silencer, (b) a flash suppressor, (c) a
muzzle brake, or (d) a muzzle compensator; or (xiii) any characteristic of like kind as enumerated in
clauses (i) through (xii);
3. A semi-automatic center-fire pistol that expels single or multiple projectiles by action of an
explosion of a combustible material with a fixed magazine capacity in excess of 10 rounds;
4. A semi-automatic center-fire pistol that expels single or multiple projectiles by action of an
explosion of a combustible material that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine and has one of
the following characteristics: (i) a folding or telescoping stock; (ii) a thumbhole stock; (iii) a second
handgrip or a protruding grip that can be held by the non-trigger hand; (iv) the capacity to accept a
magazine that attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip; (v) a shroud that is attached to, or
partially or completely encircles, the barrel and that permits the shooter to hold the pistol with the
non-trigger hand without being burned; (vi) a manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when the
pistol is unloaded; (vii) a threaded barrel capable of accepting (a) a silencer, (b) a flash suppressor, (c)
a barrel extender, or (d) a forward handgrip; or (viii) any characteristic of like kind as enumerated in
clauses (i) through (vii);


I left out the description of an "assault shotgun", since they apparently believe those exist too.

Overall, if the assault weapons ban passes, that will encompass a huge portion of rifles and handguns.

Considering how many crazy people have guns, we definitely need red flag laws.
So it's not a total gun ban, they're just trying to ban assault weapons. If that's what the march was about, then yeah, this is gun nut Incel territory.
 
Sure, but not because of trans people. The UK had laws against hate speech way before trans people started pushing for equal rights and recognition. It's like that in most of Europe.

I haven't seen them enforce said laws as strictly for any other group.

Are you referring to the Twitter incident? Twitter is a private company, so that didn't have anything to do with free speech.

I'm referring to the Wilfrid Laurier incident.
 
Considering how many crazy people have guns, we definitely need red flag laws.
So it's not a total gun ban, they're just trying to ban assault weapons. If that's what the march was about, then yeah, this is gun nut Incel territory.

You didn't even read how they are defining assault weapons. Either that, or you don't know much about guns.
 
Back
Top