This is what a world leader does

You're worse than Christiefan or Onceler when it comes to goal post moving.

We were talking about how Trump is handling North Korea and now you're babboabkut favorability ratings.

:palm:
Hey...try again when you've read the thread.
 
There will be no uprising. Leaders of any uprising will be similarly arrested and convicted, as they were in '09. And all the Big Macs in the world won't get trump to do a damned thing.

Hell...he can't even stand up to a pudgy little despot in Korea.

How would you like him to stand up?

Did Obama stand up to him? If yes, how so?

Earth to Althea, hello....

Knock knock
Who's there
Althea
Althea who
Althea again to answer my questions
 
you are the most dishonest poster I have ever come across- and that is saying something..
You are rabidly against anything not 100% progressive, yet try to maintain this air of thoughtfulness

You calling Covfefe the most dishonest person in the history of this forum is not just comical....it is just fucking bloody hilarious!
 
I give him credit when he deserves it, if you state otherwise, then you aren’t being honest.

I do slam his tweets, they are impetuous, knee jerk, ignorant and childish in most cases. The ones that make sense are usually written by someone else, as has been admitted.

No no one is as partisan as yourself, so pluck that plank out of your own eye.
Keep polishing the vag badge, Doris.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
too cold for me.
I wanted to go swimming but it's an outside pool and I worked all day..

so i'll be your Huckleberry for the night

I almost groaned you for whining about it ‘being too cold to swim outside’ lol.

It’s 9° here. Normal winter temps don’t phase me but I loathe these arctic blasts.
 
The claim on the table is that trump is such a powerful leader, he will enact change via an uprising in Iran.

How would YOU like him to stand up?

How do you know that Trump won’t help affect an uprising in Iran?

If Trump reaches out to the protestors on Twitter and they’re emboldened by the support of an American president how is that in any way a bad thing? Isnt Trump encouraging the people to overthrow the mullahs *light years* better than any military solution?

I castigated Obama at great length in 2009 when he failed to support the protestors. Yes, it matters whether the leader of the free world supports the oppressed.

You could ask Reagan or Lech Walesa if they were still around.
 
I responded directly to the point made in your post, which you obviously have no support for.

I accept your surrender.
Yea. If you don't want to read the thread, then simply try another. There are several that are active right now.
 
How do you know that Trump won’t help affect an uprising in Iran?

If Trump reaches out to the protestors on Twitter and they’re emboldened by the support of an American president how is that in any way a bad thing? Isnt Trump encouraging the people to overthrow the mullahs *light years* better than any military solution?

I castigated Obama at great length in 2009 when he failed to support the protestors. Yes, it matters whether the leader of the free world supports the oppressed.

You could ask Reagan or Lech Walesa if they were still around.
Reagan supported the ousting of the Shah? Who knew? Why did he sell chemical weapons to Saddam?

You think Iranians are allowed to tweet?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ter-then-he-joined-it/?utm_term=.ef045bb17fbc
(Twitter is still technically banned in Iran, but an increasing number of Iranian officials use it, including Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and its current president, Hassan Rouhani).
Any uprising in the Mid East will result in further destabilization, and higher oil prices. Other than that, trump has no interest in Iran. Nor is he able to support any uprising, let alone start one.
 
Reagan supported the ousting of the Shah? Who knew? Why did he sell chemical weapons to Saddam?

You think Iranians are allowed to tweet?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ter-then-he-joined-it/?utm_term=.ef045bb17fbc
Any uprising in the Mid East will result in further destabilization, and higher oil prices. Other than that, trump has no interest in Iran. Nor is he able to support any uprising, let alone start one.

Reagan supported the overthrow of communism. He and Pope John Paul both did.

I don’t know where current Pope is.

I doubt Iran’s ‘technical ban’ on Twitter has much effect. Or has sufficient effect, we’ll put it that way. I’m also confident the mullahs wish Trump wouldn’t encourage the uprising.

Donald Trump is a thorn in many sides, it seems.
 
Reagan supported the ousting of the Shah? Who knew? Why did he sell chemical weapons to Saddam?

You think Iranians are allowed to tweet?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ter-then-he-joined-it/?utm_term=.ef045bb17fbc
Any uprising in the Mid East will result in further destabilization, and higher oil prices. Other than that, trump has no interest in Iran. Nor is he able to support any uprising, let alone start one.

Higher oil prices make "green" energy, like nukes, more competitive. I thought Lefty's loved high oil prices :palm:

Didn't The Donald just authorize the sales of shoulder fired anti tank weapons to Ukraine? A similar move might be necessary in Iran.
 
Back
Top