uscitizen
Villified User
Again, you confuse the difference between "progressive" and libertarian ideas.
Please elaborate on that.
Again, you confuse the difference between "progressive" and libertarian ideas.
Liberal is not the same thing as "classical liberal" or libertarian ideas.Please elaborate on that.
I cost you nothing. I pay extra in insurance to cover that.Wearing a helmet is much like not driving drunk. You cost me too much when you bash your head on the pavement going 70 miles an hour. If it did not cost me so much I would defend your right to bash your head doing 70 miles per hour.
Liberal is not the same thing as "classical liberal" or libertarian ideas.
One group wants to force me to wear a helmet, the other wants to ensure my freedoms.
One group wants to make sure people don't use certain words to describe people, the other understands that sometimes others using their freedoms will 'offend'.
So forth.
There is a difference between "liberals" of today and "classical liberal/libertarian".
*yawn*
I cost you nothing. I pay extra in insurance to cover that.
I wear a helmet anyway. The difference is in the force. If some idiot wants to pay extra in insurance and donate his organs, so be it.
As I said, mommy doesn't need to be in the government. There IS a difference between a classic liberal and what people call "liberal" today.
You tired from partying last night?
Liberals forcing us to do things for our own good is in large part a conservative myth. Plenty of cons do the same thing.
Liberals forcing us to do things for our own good is in large part a conservative myth. Plenty of cons do the same thing.
no one's arguing about conservatives. It's about liberal vs. libertarians if you read the thread. First you say liberals don't do it then say conservatives do the same things meaning liberals do do it.
True, but the question wasn't whether conservative meant the same thing as libertarian, it was whether liberal did.Liberals forcing us to do things for our own good is in large part a conservative myth. Plenty of cons do the same thing.
Point is that conservatives do it....or would if they had the power to.
I cost you nothing. I pay extra in insurance to cover that.
I wear a helmet anyway. The difference is in the force. If some idiot wants to pay extra in insurance and donate his organs, so be it.
As I said, mommy doesn't need to be in the government. There IS a difference between a classic liberal and what people call "liberal" today.
no one's arguing about conservatives. It's about liberal vs. libertarians if you read the thread. First you say liberals don't do it then say conservatives do the same things meaning liberals do do it.
Because all people who buy motorcycle insurance pay that premium. Your nannyism aside. The bottom line is, they only cost you more if you are willing to pay for them. Let people make their own mistakes and don't because of "compassion" bail them out.How does the cop know you carry extra insurance?
He would have to pull you over to find out huh?
Wasting his time and my money.
I cost you nothing. I pay extra in insurance to cover that.
I wear a helmet anyway. The difference is in the force. If some idiot wants to pay extra in insurance and donate his organs, so be it.
As I said, mommy doesn't need to be in the government. There IS a difference between a classic liberal and what people call "liberal" today.
"They do it too!" is a confession.Point is that conservatives do it....or would if they had the power to.
Again, only if you cover them do they gain that 'benefit'. Mistaken compassion is not an excuse to start making decisions for other people. Stop covering people who are that stupid rather than forcing others to pay for your emotive reasoning that we must.Yeah someone wearing a helmet knows that their insurance will cover them if they become a permanent vegatable ? They will never go on medicare or anything when their insurance runs out ?
Personally I consider riders without helmets semi vegatables now.
Not a lot inside my po old head but it is all I have.